Explaining phobias- behavioural Flashcards

1
Q

Mowrer- Two process model

A
  1. CLASSICAL CON: initiation
    - phobia acquired through association between NS & UCS to produce a UCR.
    - After many pairings, the NS becomes CS as it results in CR
  2. OPERANT COND: maintenance
    - explains the likelihood of behaviour being repeated is increased if the outcome is rewarding.
    - the avoidance of the phobic stimulus reduces the fear and is thus negatively reinforcing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Diathesis- stress model

A
  • we may inherit a genetic vulnerability for developing phobia which is manifested when triggered by an environmental stresser
  • sophisticated interactionist explanation by a holistic approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

nature vs nurture

A
  • focuses more on NURTURE; experiences shape our phobic development = environmentally deterministic
  • ignores NATURE
  • not always developed from a traumatic incident, but may be explained in terms of bio preparedness.
  • SELIGMAN: were genetically programmed to rapidly learn an association between potentially life-threatening stimuli and fear which would’ve been dangerous in our evolutionary past
  • thus would’ve been adaptive to rapidly learn to avoid such stimuli.
  • biological preparedness explains why ppl are less likely to develop fears of modern objects such as toasters than spiders as they weren’t a danger in our evolutionary past
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the two process model ignores cognitive factors

A
  • there are cognitive aspects to phobias that cannot be explained in traditional behaviourist framework
  • cognitive approach proposes that phobias may develop as a consequence of irrational thinking
  • this creates extreme anxiety and may trigger a phobia
  • value of this alternative explanation is that it leads to cognitive therapies eg CBT
  • come situations more successful than behaviourist treatments
  • rates of efficacy is high
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

heavily supported by evidence

A

LITTLE ALBERT WATSON N RAYNOR

  • presented little Albert with a white rat and he showed no fear
  • presented the rat with a loud bang= startled Albert and made him cry
  • after continuous association of rat and loud noise, he was classically condition to experience fear at the sight of the rat
  • his fear generalised to other stimuli that were similar to the rat eg fur coat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly