External Aids Flashcards

1
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Historical Facts and Circumstances

A
  • The court may take into account such external or historical facts as may be necessary to understand the subject matter of the statute or the surrounding circumstances in which the statute was enacted.
  • Lord Halsbury: Facts existing at the time
  • Lord Atkinson: The evils which, as appears from the provision, it was designed to remedy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

hein

What provisions come under Parliamentary History

A
  1. Bills in their original form and the amendments that were considered
  2. The language of the ministor proposing the bill
  3. Reports of the committee (standing or select)
  4. White paper issued by the Government
  5. Law Commission reports
  6. Parliamentary debates on the bill
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Azeez Basha Case

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Forms of references to other statutes

A
  1. Pari Materia
  2. Assistance of an earlier statute
  3. Assistance of a later statute
  4. Incorporation of an earlier act into a later one
  5. Codifying and consolidating statutes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to deal with statutes in para materia

A

Where different statutes deal with identical subjects at different times, or when they deal with the same subject, they are in pari materia and should be considered together as one system

When acts are so related they form a system or a code of legislation.
Professor Blackstone recommended that they be grouped together and compared, as an aid to construction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Assistance of earlier statute

A

When a provosion in an earlier statute is well settled and well recognized, and a word that appears in that provision is used in a later act,

Parliament intends that the same judicial interpretation should be followed for construction of the word in the later act. This is because it is presumed that the legislature is aware of the meaning courts have ascribed to words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When will presumption of same construction NOT apply when referring to an earlier statute

A
  1. When different language is used in the later statute. It is presumed that the alteration is deliberate
  2. When earlier decisions of the court are shown to have been erroneous.
  3. When the act is purely consolidatory and the parliament has not gotten an opportunity to reconsider the earlier acts.
  4. Does not apply to ordinary words used in English Language
  5. Where two or more high courts have contradictory views and the SC has not settled on it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When will changing language not indicate a change in legislative intent?

A
  1. When the natural and ordinary meaning of the existing words do not indicate the intention of the legislature to change.
  2. When the addition of the word only makes clear a meaning which was already implied
  3. When the change in language is to improve the style.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How to deal with assistance of a later statute

A

The legislature can amend an earlier act to declare its meaning. A later statute can be used to expose the meaning the parliament meant (explanatory and declaratory acts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Incorporation by reference of earlier act into later

A
  1. This is a mere device of legislative convenience to avoid verbatim reproductions of the earlier act into the later one.
  2. It transposes by reference the provisions of the earlier act into the new one.
  3. All the amendments made in the previous act will also be applicable.
  4. If a previous act is repealed, such an effect will be there on the new one also.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the distinction between incorporation by reference and mere citation or reference

A

Mere reference or citation
Modification, repeal or re-enactment will have the same effect for the statute which refers it

Incorporation by reference
Any change in the incorporated statute by way of amendment has no repurcussions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effect of usage and practice

A
  1. The usage or practice developed under a statute is indicative of the meaning ascribed to the words. Such references are admissible.
  2. The opinion of a person who lived at or soon after the time when they were made is relevant.
  3. It can be assumed that when legislature re-enacted a statute and where we find that the prior statute had a continuous practice and the legislation has repeated the words from which the continuous practice arose, the legislature meant for those words to be understood in their recieved meaning.
  4. When the practice recieves judicial or legislative approval it gains additional weight.
    Example: Process to appoint judges of SC and HC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contemporanea exposition est optima et fortissinia in lege

A

This is a maxim laid down by Lord coke which means that the best exposition of a statute is that which it has recieved from its contemporary authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The judicial appointments saga (usage and practices)

A

Article 124 gives the power of appointment to the Union through the president after consultation with the CJI.
1. 1st Judges case 1981: Ultimate power of appointment lays with president, CJI must be properly consulted
2. 2nd Judges Case 1993: President’s ultimate power is diluted, CJI must be given the primary role for the independence of the judiciary (idea of collusion is born)
3. 3rd Judges Case 1998: Guidelines for the collegium

NJAC act was passed in 2014 to establish a commission with non-judicial members. This was struct down by the court.
It was deemed to limit the authority of the judiciary and threaten its independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Significance of International Law

A
  1. International law may act as guidelines for interpretation where the domestic law is ambiguous.
  2. It is presumed that the legislature does not enact anything that is contrary to the tenets of intl. law.
  3. Court may not pronounce an act void for contravening international law
17
Q

Massimilano Latorre vs. UOI 2021
(Italian Marines Case)

A

Two Italian marines were charged of shooting two fisherman and criminal prosecution was started against the marines
The domestic Criminal investigation could not be continued because India and Italy signed and ratified the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
It was agreed to settled the dispute concerning the incident in the binding dispute resolution mechanism provided under Annex VII of UNCLOS.

18
Q

Significance of England’s preconstitutional era judgements

A
  1. Privy Council decisions are binding due to historical reasons
  2. The general rule is that provisions of indian statutes are based on English Court’s judgements.
  3. Example: McNoughten on insanity. Salmond v Salmond on Corporate Veil
19
Q

Significance of Dictionaries

A

When a word is not defined in the act itself or the general clauses act, it is permissible to refer to a dictionary and find the general sense in which the word is understood in common parlance.
Justice Jeevan Reddy: A statute cannot be always construed with the dictionary in one hand and the statute in other. Due regard must be given to the scheme, context and legislative history

20
Q

Rameshwar Prasad Goyal

A

Usage of the word “otherwise” in the Supreme Court rules of 1996.
The term “Otherwise” contained in Rule 8-A has been defined in dictionary to mean contrarily. The word ‘otherwise’ should be construed as ejesdum generis and must be interpreted to mean some kind of legal obligation or some transaction enforceable in law.