Extreme Deprivation Flashcards

1
Q

English-Romanian Adoption Studies: Beckett et al (2006)

What happened to children who were adopted after 6 months of deprivation?

A

Had:

  • Substantially lower IQs
  • emotional & behavioural issues
  • difficulties in social interactions with people outside their families
  • more likely to be victims of bullying/exclusion at school
  • some presented impaired ToM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the overall conclusions of English-Romanian Adoption Studies?

A
  • If children are adopted before the age of 6 months, there is evidence children will demonstrate resilience & catch-up
  • Children adopted after the age of 6 months show development but they never catch up with controls
  • Children adopted after 2 years present some development but severe cognitive & social limitations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the deprivation that Genie Wiley faced.

A

Kept in isolation in a dark room from birth to 13 years old.

  • was never spoken to
  • spent her days strapped to a potty chair and nights strapped to her bed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the state Genie Wiley was in when she was found

A
  • Was the size of a 6 year old
  • Could not walk
  • Couldn’t talk (muttered infantile noises)
  • Still wore nappies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened to Genie Wiley after she was discovered?

A

She was taken into care, and seen by scientists/teachers/therapists

  • she began to rapidly learn words & wanted to engage with the world
  • BUT could never develop language - couldn’t form sentences or have conversations

At age 18 briefly lived with mother but mother couldn’t cope, so was moved around care homes & homes of scientists/therapists

  • Scientists/therapists were banned from contacting her due to conflict of interest worsening Genie’s condition
  • Now lives in a care home for adults
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Oxana Malaya’s deprivation

A
  • Parents were alcoholics
  • When she was 3 they left her outside all night, she crawled into a dog kennel to keep warm
  • Lived with dogs between ages 3 and 8
  • When discovered she behaved like a dog
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened to Oxana Malaya after she was discovered?

A

Started having lessons for human development:

  • how to walk on feet
  • how to eat with hands
  • how to speak
  • how to tell time

Now lives in a home for mentally ill because doesn’t behave ‘normally’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the state that Daniele was found in in 2005.

A
  • 8 years old
  • weighed roughly 40lbs
  • covered in rashes, insect bites & her own filth
  • unable to walk or talk
  • was wearing a nappy that appeared to have been soiled for a long time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened to Daniele after she was found in 2005?

A
  • Was adopted
  • Now goes to a high school
  • isn’t very sociable with peers but is with teachers & adoptive father
  • doesn’t respond well to female adults due to being mistreated by mother
  • when she eats she will keep eating until she is sick if she can - doesn’t understand she won’t be starved again
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened to the Koluchova twins?

A
  • male, monozygotic twins
  • faced severe deprivation from 18m - 7yrs
  • locked in unheated cupboard
  • starved & beaten
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What state were the Koluchova twins in when they were found?

A
  • could barely walk
  • were terrified of people & normal objects
  • engaged in very basic play
  • had very basic language
  • severe health problems due to malnutrition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did the Koluchova twins progress after being discovered?

A
  • faced no permanent cognitive impairment
  • speech & language developed normally
  • caught up with peers in terms of school work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Skuse (1984) do?

A

Presented a set of different case studies to analyse what we can learn from cases of extreme deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What cases did Skuse (1984) say were examples of good outcomes after extreme deprivation?

A

Isabelle
Koluchova twins
Douglas & Suton twins
Louise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What causes did Skuse (1984) say were examples of poor outcomes after extreme deprivation?

A

Anna
Genie
Mary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

According to Skuse (1984) an examination of cases of extreme deprivation allows us to what…?

A
  • To study the minimal experiences needed during childhood that are sufficient and necessary for typical psychological development
  • To study whether there are critical periods for different aspects of development
17
Q

What did Skuse (1984) conclude regarding the effect of early deprivation on eventual development outcome?

A

Evidence reviewed suggests that, in the absence of genetic or congenital abnormalities or a history of gross malnourishment, victims of extreme deprivation have an excellent prognosis
- so assuming genotype/biological structures are ok, development can achieve normal levels

18
Q

What is meant by the term ‘Critical Periods’?

A

The limitation of time for learning a task/function in development
- for example the case of Genie provides evidence that the critical period for language acquisition is around 12-13yrs

19
Q

What are thought to be the minimum experiences a child needs to develop?

A
General cognition 
- perception, attention, memory, language etc. 
Emotional development 
- attachment, emotions 
Social development 
- friendship, respect, empathy, etc.
20
Q

What questions are asked to compare the similarities/differences of a feral child upon their discovery? (Skuse, 1984)

A
  • How do these children perceive the world?
  • What social responses do they manifest?
  • Do they speak or understand speech?
  • What emotions do they express?
  • Does this tell us anything about the vulnerability of different psychological attributes?
21
Q

What questions are used to compare the similarities and differences of a feral child during their recovery? (Skuse, 1984)

A
  • How quickly is each faculty gained? (e.g. motor movement, visual perception, speech, etc.)
  • What is the course of development of each faculty?
  • How is this course dependent on the stimulation/intervention provided?
  • What intensity of intervention is necessary for the best possible outcome?
22
Q

What questions are used to compare the similarities and differences of the outcomes of feral children? (Skuse, 1984)

A
  • What is the outcome after a suitable follow up period (and what is a suitable follow up period)?
  • For each cognitive function: how much “normal development” is reached?
  • Can we predict the outcome at discovery? If not, when?
  • Is the rate of recovery the critical prognostic factor of outcome?
    If some areas do not recover, what conclusions can we draw? (e.g. inadequate intervention? inadequate compensation?)