(F) Critical Appraisal of Journals Flashcards
(46 cards)
- Defined by Amanda Buris
- Is a systematic process of examining research to assess its trustworthiness, validity, and relevance for making informed decisions
- It involves evaluating the quality, reliability, and applicability
of research findings to determine their value in a specific context
This is a step in the research process wherein we want to
select the appropriate journal that has to be included in the
review of related literatur
Critical Appraisal of Journals
4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess
- Validity
- Relevance
- Reliability
- Quality
VRRQ
4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess
- How well a test measures an outcome
- We should do this if the results of the paper that we are reading are valid
Validity
4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess
How important the topic is
Relevance
4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess
How trustworthy is the research
Reliability
4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess
Was there a systematic process for answering a
question>
Quality
- Provides a structured framework to assess the strengths and
weaknesses of a study design, methodology, results and conclusion and will determine the validity, relevance, reliability, and quality. - There is no gold-standard critical appraisal tool
- Critical appraisal to promote evidence-based practice and
inform our decision making in healthcare, by enabling users to critically evaluate and assess the quality and relevance of
research evidence
Critical Appraisal Tool
T or F
- There is no gold-standard critical appraisal tool
- Critical appraisal promote speculation based practice
- T
- F (evidence based)
- Broad goals that outline the overall purpose of the study
General Objectives
- More detailed and focused aims that help achieve
the general objectives
Specific objectives
This section provides objectives
General and Specific Objectives
This section provides context for the research, explaining the problem,
previous studies, and why the study is important It include: summary of existing research, gaps or limitations, justification for why study is necessary
Background of the study
Background of the study should include?
a. Summary of existing research
b. Gaps or limitations
c. Justification for why study is necessary
d. both
e. neither
d. both
- This section should concisely state the main focus of the research.
- Should be specific, informative, and accurately reflect the study’s content and methodology
Title
Provides an overview of the study, leading to the research
problem It includes:
* A brief background of the topic
* The significance of the study
* The research objectives
* A clear statement of the problem being investigated.
Introduction
T or F
Introduction should include conclusion of results
F (bg, significance, objectives, SOP) only
BOSS
Introduction
What does TIPS stand for?
T - Trends
I - Issues
P - Problems
S - Solutions
Introduction
- What should be first written?
- After TIP, what is proposed?
- TIP
T - trends
I - Issues
P - Problems - Solutions
TIPS
- Are measurable characteristics or factors that influence research outcomes.
- Classified as dependent, independent, or even confounding
Variables
Variables
- The outcome or effect being measured in the study.
- It changes in response to the independent variable.
Dependent Variable
Variables
- The factor manipulated or categorized to observe its effect on the dependent variable.
Independent Variable
Identify if independent or dependent variable:
The antimicrobial activity of anthocyanin content of Oryza sativa L (Black Rice) grain extract
against Citrobacter freundii
- The control and test group: Amount of antibiotic
- Time
- Concentration
Independent (it is the one manipulated)
Identify if independent or dependent variable:
The antimicrobial activity of anthocyanin content of Oryza sativa L (Black Rice) grain extract
against Citrobacter freundii
- Zone of inhibition
Dependent variable (depends on independent variable)
- Statement predicting the relationship between variables
- Is actually extracted from the inferential questions that are designed by the researcher
- Two types: Null, Alternative
Hypothesis