(F) Critical Appraisal of Journals Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q
  • Defined by Amanda Buris
  • Is a systematic process of examining research to assess its trustworthiness, validity, and relevance for making informed decisions
  • It involves evaluating the quality, reliability, and applicability
    of research findings to determine their value in a specific context
    This is a step in the research process wherein we want to
    select the appropriate journal that has to be included in the
    review of related literatur
A

Critical Appraisal of Journals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess

A
  1. Validity
  2. Relevance
  3. Reliability
  4. Quality

VRRQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess

  • How well a test measures an outcome
  • We should do this if the results of the paper that we are reading are valid
A

Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess

How important the topic is

A

Relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess

How trustworthy is the research

A

Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

4 parameters that critical appraisal of literature help to assess

Was there a systematic process for answering a
question>

A

Quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Provides a structured framework to assess the strengths and
    weaknesses
    of a study design, methodology, results and conclusion and will determine the validity, relevance, reliability, and quality.
  • There is no gold-standard critical appraisal tool
  • Critical appraisal to promote evidence-based practice and
    inform our decision making in healthcare, by enabling users to critically evaluate and assess the quality and relevance of
    research evidence
A

Critical Appraisal Tool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T or F

  1. There is no gold-standard critical appraisal tool
  2. Critical appraisal promote speculation based practice
A
  1. T
  2. F (evidence based)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • Broad goals that outline the overall purpose of the study
A

General Objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  • More detailed and focused aims that help achieve
    the general objectives
A

Specific objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

This section provides objectives

A

General and Specific Objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

This section provides context for the research, explaining the problem,
previous studies, and why the study is important It include: summary of existing research, gaps or limitations, justification for why study is necessary

A

Background of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Background of the study should include?

a. Summary of existing research
b. Gaps or limitations
c. Justification for why study is necessary
d. both
e. neither

A

d. both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • This section should concisely state the main focus of the research.
  • Should be specific, informative, and accurately reflect the study’s content and methodology
A

Title

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Provides an overview of the study, leading to the research
problem It includes:
* A brief background of the topic
* The significance of the study
* The research objectives
* A clear statement of the problem being investigated.

A

Introduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

T or F

Introduction should include conclusion of results

A

F (bg, significance, objectives, SOP) only

BOSS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Introduction

What does TIPS stand for?

A

T - Trends
I - Issues
P - Problems
S - Solutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Introduction

  1. What should be first written?
  2. After TIP, what is proposed?
A
  1. TIP
    T - trends
    I - Issues
    P - Problems
  2. Solutions

TIPS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  • Are measurable characteristics or factors that influence research outcomes.
  • Classified as dependent, independent, or even confounding
20
Q

Variables

  • The outcome or effect being measured in the study.
  • It changes in response to the independent variable.
A

Dependent Variable

21
Q

Variables

  • The factor manipulated or categorized to observe its effect on the dependent variable.
A

Independent Variable

22
Q

Identify if independent or dependent variable:
The antimicrobial activity of anthocyanin content of Oryza sativa L (Black Rice) grain extract
against Citrobacter freundii

  • The control and test group: Amount of antibiotic
  • Time
  • Concentration
A

Independent (it is the one manipulated)

23
Q

Identify if independent or dependent variable:
The antimicrobial activity of anthocyanin content of Oryza sativa L (Black Rice) grain extract
against Citrobacter freundii

  • Zone of inhibition
A

Dependent variable (depends on independent variable)

24
Q
  • Statement predicting the relationship between variables
  • Is actually extracted from the inferential questions that are designed by the researcher
  • Two types: Null, Alternative
25
Hypothesis is actually ☝️🤓 extracted from?
inferential questions designed by researchers
26
# Two types of hypothesis * States that there is no significant effect or relationship between variables.
Null hypothesis (H0)
27
# Two types of hypothesis * Suggests that there is a significant effect or relationship between variables
Alternative Hypothesis (H1)
28
This section explains how the study is conducted. It includes: * Research design * Data collection methods * Data analysis techniques
Methodology
29
* This section provides a conceptual framework guides the study’s design and analysis * It represents the relationship between variables and can be illustrated using a diagram
Reseaarch paradigm/simulacrum
30
Narrative description of the study’s design and analysis representing the relationship between variables
Conceptual framework
31
1. A conceptual framework that guides the study’s design and analysis. 2. Narrative description of the study’s design and analysis representing the relationship between variables 3. It represents the relationship between variables and can be illustrated using a diagram. 4. Represents relationship between variables a. Research paradigm/simulacrum b. Conceptual framework c. both d. neither
1. A. 2. B 3. A 4. C
32
Where is research paradigm based on?
SOP of research
33
* Refers to the accuracy and credibility of the study. * It ensures that the research measures what it intends to measure and that the findings are reliable and applicable. * Refers to the extent to which a test or measurement accurately represents what it intends to measure. * A study with high validity produces conclusions that are applicable and trustworthy.
Validity
34
* The systematic errors that can affect research validity and outcomes. * It can result from (Sampling errors, Researcher influence, Measurement errors) * Any systematic error in the design, conduct, or analysis of a study that results in a mistaken estimate of an exposure’s effect on the risk of disease * Refers to systematic errors that distorts the result of a study, leading to incorrect conclusions.
Bias
35
* The process of examining, organizing, and interpreting collected data to draw meaningful conclusions. * It involves statistical techniques to validate findings.
Data analysis
36
What are the statistical treatment mentioned?
* T-test * Spearman rank correlation * Mann-withney u test * Kruskal wallis test
37
# Stastical Treatment * Statistical test used to compare the means of two groups and determine if their differences are statistically significant * Independent (Unpaired) T-test * Paired T-test
T-test
38
* A non-parametric statistical test that measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two ranked (ordinal) variables. * It is used when data **do not follow a normal distribution**
Spearman rank correlation
39
* A non-parametric test used to **compare differences** between two independent groups when the **data is not normally distributed**. * An alternative to t-test for ordinal or nin-parametric data
Mann-whitney u test
40
Classify test: 2 groups, parametric
T-test
41
Classify test: 2 groups, non-parametric (ordinal)
Mann-whitney u test (MWU)
42
Classify test: 3 groups, Parametric
ANOVA
43
Classify test: 3 groups, non-parametric (ordinal)
Kruskal-Wallis Test (KW test)
44
* Refers to the closeness of measurement or an estimate to the true value * In epidemiology and research, accuracy is essential for ensuring that results are both precise and valid. * It depends on minimizing both systematic errors (bias) and random errors. * High accuracy indicates that the results are close to reality and can be relied upon for decision-making.
Accuracy
45
# Match 1. Refers to the closeness of measurement or an estimate to the true value. 2. How well test measures an outcome 3. Accuracy and credibility if study, extent to which research accurately represents what it tend to measure 4. Systematic errors a. Validity b. Relevance c. Reliability d. Quality e. Accuracy f. Bias f. Data Analysis
1. e. Accuracy 2. a. Validity 3. a. Validity 4. f. Bias
46
# Match 1. Process of examining, organizing, and interpreting collected data to draw meaningful conclusions 2. Relationship of variables 3. Using statistical techniques to validate results 4. Provides a structured framework assess the strengths and weaknesses of a study design 5. Measurable characteristics or factors that influence research outcomes 6. Concisely state the main focus of the research 7. Overview 8. Includes Justification for why the study is necessary 9. Actually extracted from the inferential questions that are designed by the researcher 10. Explains Data collection methods 11. A conceptual framework that guides the study’s design and analysis 12. TIPS a. Critical Appraisal Tool b. Objectives c. Background of the study d. Title e. Introduction f. Variables g. Hypothesis h. Methodology i. Research simulacrum j. Conceptual framework k. Data Analysis
1. k. Data Analysis 2. g. Hypothesis 3. k. Data Analysis 4. i. Research simulacrum 5. f. Variables 6. d. Title 7. e. Introduction 8. c. Background of the study 9. g. Hypothesis 10. h. Methodology 11. i. Research simulacrum 12. e. Introduction