Failure of Settlement and the Second Civil War Flashcards
Charles I to Cromwell (48 cards)
Post-war divisions - Charles I
- Still thinks he can beat parliament
- No-one wants to remove him as king
- unwilling to compromise over the future of the Church
Post-war divisions - Political Presbyterians
- Wanted a conservative settlement with Charles
Wanted: - Control of the militia
- To choose Charles’s advisors
- Reform the church = Directory of worship
Post-war divisions - The army
- Feb 1647 = MPs disbanded the new model army - MPs wanted to remove radial officers and replace them with Presbyterians
- Troops wanted pay and indemnity
Newcastle propositions
- July 1946
Stated: - Charles would accept Presbyterianism for 3 years
- Parliament control Militia for 20 years
- Triennial act remains
- only 58 Royalists would be pardoned
Charles Stalled hoping that Parliament would breakdown and he wouldn’t have to accept
Parliament moves to disband the new model army
- Army were owed £3 million - Parliament had to pay this - Wouldn’t have to if they disbanded the army - MPs voted in favour of this in Feb 1647
Politicisation of the New model army
- Army disagreed with parliament disbanding them - also seemed Political Presbyterians were setting up a new rival army
New Model army’s opposition to the parliament
- Declaration of dislike - 30th March 1647 = made the army enemies of the state
- April 1647 - Army elected Agitators to represent their views - Many were radical
- Levellers began to gain support from within the party
- May 1647 Commons voted to disband the army
Army control of the king
- 2 June 1647 - Charles seized by Joyce under Agitators orders
- 4th June 1647 - Army produced the ‘humble remonstrance’ declaring they would not disband unless grievances were met
General council of the army
- 5th June 1647 the Army created the General council of the army which was led by Fairfax and dominated by Cromwell and Ireton - Solemn engagement agreed the army should stay together until a fair settlement was assured
Representation of the army
Outline the position of the army stating they wanted…
- Purge of parliament
- Guaranteed right of freedom
- Extension of religious freedom
July 1647 = Impeachment charges against 11 MPs including Holles who were seen as leading Parliament against the Army
Division 1647 - 1648
King believed that division between parliament and army gave him mire time to recover and defeat parliament
Heads of the Proposals
More generous to King compared to Newcastle propositions - Included:
- Parliament control of militia
- Act of oblivion = exempted only a few Royalists from punishment
- Parliament Control of offices of state for 10 years
Army agitators felt the proposals were too moderate and thus it created divisions within the army
Division in Parliament
- Conservatives (Political Presbyterians) were happy with the heads of the proposals
- Othered favoured ‘liberty for tender consciences’ - Known as Political Independents
Summer of 1647
Mob in London which forced many of the moderate MPs to flee to the army for safety
Division within the army
- summer of 1647 = struggle for control of the army between Moderate officers and the Levellers who wanted to use the army for revolution
The case of the army truly stated
- Oct 1647
- demanded wider reform including that power was derived from the people
The agreement of the people
- Stated all people were capable of exercising political rights - Grandees were repelled by such revolutionary ideas
Putney Debates
Levellers debated with the Grandees - aim was to get the army to accept the agreement o the people - Agitators were in favour - Final outcome is unknown
Second civil war
- Charles escaped 11th November 1647
- Cromwell gathered troops in response
- Charles was sent the four bills whilst in prison which was a combination of Newcastle propositions and army heads - He rejected the offer
The Engagement
- Dec 1647
- Charles made an agreement with the Engagers = Sottish covenanters - Charles agreed to 3years of Presbyterianism in England
- Parliament passed vote of no addresses on the 3rd Jan 1648, which meant there would be no further negotiations with the king
Charles name during the second civil war
Called Charles Stuart instead of King Charles and named ‘man of blood’ as he was fighting against his own people
Second civil war - response from Scotland
Support for the Engagers - Reluctance to fight until Charles implemented the Covenant
How did Cromwell feel about victory of the Second civil war
‘Nothing but the hand of God’
Windsor prayer meeting
- April 1648
- Charles called man of blood - First time idea of Regicide was mentioned