Fair Trial Guarantees Flashcards

1
Q

if 2 coDs are tried together, whem may they be severed

A

if at any point, 1 coD is unfairly prejudiced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

if a joint trial and 1 coD’s confession implicates the other D,

A

trial must be severed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

to show ineffective assistance of counsel, D must show

A

ineffective: fell below prevailing norms
and
prejudice: reas probability that the verdict would not have been guilty had counsel been effective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

D’s right to represent himself: what can the court do

A

can appoint standby counsel

can say D is incompetent to defend self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

waiver of rt to counsel must be

A

knowing and voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

failure to provide counsel at trial =

A

automatic reversal.

before trial, harmless error rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

if a COI is shown bt counsel that jeopardizes rts of any D or adversely affects atty’s perf

A

violates 6A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

rt to jury trial attaches where D is facing

A

potential sentence of over 6m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

of people in a jury that was held uncons

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when does D have rt to a public trial

A

in all crim pros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

fundamental right to confront Ws’s primary purpose is

A

to give D an opp to xexam Ws at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

right to compulsory process gives D

A

power to present own Ws and a fair opp to present a defense free from intimidation or prejudical exclusion of material ev

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

aff defenses may be proven by

A

prep of ev

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

insanity cases: burden

A

D shows some ev of insanity

pros must prove sanity BRD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

mandatory presumptions are

A

uncons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

permissive presumptions are

A

ok where rational connection exists bt proof and inference