Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

appeal to ignorance

A
  • argues something is true because there is no evidence that it is false
  • also true vice versa.

ARGUMENT AD IGNORATIAM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

appeal to inappropriate authority

A
  • appeals to the wrong authority

ARGUMENT AD VERECUNDIAM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

complex question

A

two questions rolled into one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

argument against the person

A

attack against the person

ARGUMENT AD HOMINEM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

accident

A

jumps quickly FROM a generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

converse accident

A

jumps quickly TO a genereralization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

false cause

A
  • asserts that a causal connection exists even though there is none
  • post hoc ergo propter hoc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

begging the question

A
  • using circular reasoning

PETITIO PRINCIPII

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

appeal to the people

A
  • appeal to emotion
  • snob appeal
  • bandwagon

ARGUMENT AD POPULUM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

appeal to pity

A
  • uses guilt to support argument

ARGUMENT AD MISERICORDIUM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

appeal to force

A
  • uses force or threat of force to support argument

ARGUMENT AD BACULUM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Irrelevant conclusion

A
  • premisses of the argument support a different conclusion
  • misses the point

IGNORATIO ELENCHI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

equivocation

A
  • uses a word or phrase in more than one sense or meaning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

amphiboly

A
  • a mistake in grammar results in uncertain meaning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

composition

A
  • argues that the WHOLE has an attribute because the part has that attribute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

division

A
  • argues that the PART has an attribute because the whole has that attribute
17
Q

red herring

A
  • argues by changing the topic to divert attention from the issue
18
Q

straw man

A
  • argues by misrepresenting, exaggerating, or oversimplifying to distort the issue
19
Q

weak or false analogy

A
  • makes a comparison which is not strong enough to support the argument