Fallacies Flashcards
(22 cards)
sob story
use emotion to distract the audience from the facts and to manipulate the audience into drawing unjustified conclusions
oversimplification
easy answer to complicated question
red herrings
misleading or unrelated evidence to support a conclusion
scare tactics
frightening people to agree with through threats of what will happen if you don’t
band wagon/ ad populum
encourage an audience to agree with the writer because everyone elce is doing it
slippery slope
one thing will lead to another with disastrous results
either/ or
reduce complicated issue to one with only two possible courses
false need
arguents creating an unecessary desire for things
false athourity
asking audience to agree with the assertion of a writer based simply on his or her character or the authority of another person who may not be fully qualified to offer that assertion
failing to accept the burden of proof
the assertion of a claim without presenting a reasoned argument to support it
using authority instead of evidence/ overreliance of authority
personal athority as proof
guilt by association
calls someones charicter in to question by exammining the character of that persons associates
dogmatism
shuts down argument by saying writers beliefes are the only acceptable ones
moral equivalence
compares minor problems with much more serious crimes, or vice versa
ad hominem
argument attack a persons character rather than his reasoning
straw man
arguments set up and often dismantle easily refutable arguments in order to misrepresent an opponents argument in order to defeat them
faulty causality, post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
arguments confuse chronology with causation
non sequitur
statement that doesnt logically relate to what comes before it
equivication
half truth statement that is partially correct but purposely obscures entire truth
begging the question/ circular reasoning
occurs when a writer simply restates the claim in a different way
faulty analigy
inaccurate, inappropriate, or misleading comparison between two things
stacked evidence/ slanting
represents only one side of the issue