Fallacies Flashcards

(58 cards)

1
Q

affirming the consequence

A

even if both premises are true, they do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

petitio principii

A

begging the question, tactic of assuming what you need to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ad hominem

A

instead of criticising claim, criticise person making it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

equivocation

A

same term is used variably in different parts of the argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

post hoc, ergo propter hoc

A

‘correlation does not imply causation’, inferring that something is responsible for something else because the former precedes the latter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

retrodiction

A

reasoning from the present to the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

direct inference

A

reasoning from populations to samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

induction-to-causes

A

reasoning from effects to causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

induction-to-unobservables

A

reasoning from observables to unobservables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

instance-to-the-next-instance

A

reasoning from one or more observed instances to the next instance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

enumerative induction

A

reasoning from one or more particular instances to all instances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

disjunction introduction

A

A, therefore A or B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conjunction elimination

A

A and B, therefore A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

disjunction elimination

A

A or B, not A therefore B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what do truth tables show?

A

validity and consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

a posteriori

A

knowledge based on facts/past events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

modus tollens

A

if A then B, not B therefore not A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

modus ponens

A

if A then B, A therefore B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

reductio ad absurdum

A

proposition disproved by following implications to logically absurd conlusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

negation elimination

A

removes double negatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

contraposition

A

if A then B, not A therefore not B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

necessary condition

A

something which must be present for another condition to occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

sufficient condition

A

something which produces said condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

conditional proof

A

something which proves if A then B

25
reasoning by contradiction
proves proposition by showing that assuming proposition is false leads to contradiction
26
circular reasoning
fallacy in which reasoning begins with what are trying to end with
27
law of non-contradiction
contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time
28
logical equivalence
two statements with the same truth values for every intrepretation
29
synthetic statements
opposite of analytic, any statement which cannot be determined by linguistic meaning alone
30
even if both premises are true, they do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion
affirming the consequence
31
begging the question, tactic of assuming what you need to prove
petitio principii
32
instead of criticising claim, criticise person making it
ad hominem
33
same term is used variably in different parts of the argument
equivocation
34
'correlation does not imply causation', inferring that something is responsible for something else because the former precedes the latter
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
35
reasoning from the present to the past
retrodiction
36
reasoning from populations to samples
direct inference
37
reasoning from effects to causes
induction-to-causes
38
reasoning from observables to unobservables
induction-to-unobservables
39
reasoning from one or more observed instances to the next instance
instance-to-the-next-instance
40
reasoning from one or more particular instances to all instances
enumerative induction
41
A, therefore A or B
disjunction introduction
42
A and B, therefore A
conjunction elimination
43
A or B, not A therefore B
disjunction elimination
44
validity and consistency
what do truth tables show?
45
knowledge based on facts/past events
a posteriori
46
if A then B, not B therefore not A
modus tollens
47
if A then B, A therefore B
modus ponens
48
proposition disproved by following implications to logically absurd conlusion
reductio ad absurdum
49
removes double negatives
negation elimination
50
if A then B, not A therefore not B
contraposition
51
something which must be present for another condition to occur
necessary condition
52
something which produces said condition
sufficient condition
53
something which proves if A then B
conditional proof
54
proves proposition by showing that assuming proposition is false leads to contradiction
reasoning by contradiction
55
fallacy in which reasoning begins with what are trying to end with
circular reasoning
56
contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time
law of non-contradiction
57
two statements with the same truth values for every intrepretation
logical equivalence
58
opposite of analytic, any statement which cannot be determined by linguistic meaning alone
synthetic statements