Family Law/Community Property Flashcards
(42 cards)
partition or exchange of community property
spouses can partition or exchange their community property, including income, increases, and after-acquired property.
statutory defenses to Premarital/Martial agreements
(1) did not sign agreement voluntarily; OR
(2) agreement was unconscionable when signed AND prior to signing spouse was not provided a fair disclosure of property and obligations, spouse did not waive disclosure, and spouse could not have reasonably known of property or obligations
threatening a legal right is not duress, it is fine to state “will not marry you if you do not sign”
factors for unconscionability (marital agreements)
(1) entire atmosphere; (2) available alternative; (3) non-bargaining ability of one party; (4) if K is illegal or against public policy; and (5) whether K is oppressive or unreasonable
retroactive child support
it is presumed that a court order limiting the amount of retroactive support to no more than 4 years before the date the petition was filed is reasonable and in the best interest of the child
presumption is rebutted with evidence that obligor (1) knew or should have known he was the father; and (2) sought to avoid paying child support
disproving paternity
(1) presumed father and mother did not live together or engage in sexual intercourse during the probable time of conception; OR (2) presumed father was precluded from commencing the proceeding because of a mistaken belief he was the father based on a misrepresentation that led him to that conclusion
genetic testing (paternity)
court may deny motion if, based on clear and convincing evidence, determines that (1) the conduct of the parent estops him from denying parentage; and (2) it would be inequitable to disprove the relationship
in determining the later, the court must look at best interest of the child and: (1) time between the proceeding and when the presumed father was put on notice; (2) time father has assumed the role of father; (3) facts around discovery of possible non-paternity; (4) nature of relationship between child and presumed father; (5) age of the child; (6) any harm that may result to the child if paternity is disproved; and (7) other factors that may arise from the disruption of father-child relationship
offsetting reimbursement claim with child support
courts can resolve a claim for reimbursement by using equitable principles, including the principle that claims may be offset against each other if the court determines it to be appropriate.
A court MAY NOT recognize a claim for reimbursement for the payment of child support or the living expenses of a child
conservatorship
it is a rebuttable presumption that joint managing conservatorship is in the best interest of the child and the court MUST make findings of fact to overcome this presumption and proof by clear and convincing evidence. A history of family violence removes this presumption
court considers evidence of intentional use of physical force, or evidence of sexual abuse, by a party against the spouse, child’s parent, or any person under 18, committed within 2 years before or during suit
modifying conservatorship
(1) best interest of the child and
(2) material and substantial change in circumstances since rendition of the last order
Court abuse of discretion
acting without reference to guiding principles (acted in an arbitrary or unreasonable manner)
Obligor’s intentional unemployment
if actual income is significantly less than what he could earn because of intentional underemployment or unemployment, court may apply the guidelines to his earning potential (not just his actual earnings)
Child support guidelines
statutory guidelines apply to obligor’s monthly net resources, or $8,550, whichever is less
presumptive amount for one child is 20% of net resources. increases by 5% for each child (up to 40%)
obligation ends when (1) child reaches 18 or graduates high school; (2) child emancipates; (3) child dies; or (4) for an indefinite period of time if child is disabled
Deviation from Child support guidelines
courts can deviate after looking at all of the relevant factors, including: (1) special needs of the child; (2) ability of the parents to pay; (3) amount of possession and access to the child; and (4) financial resources available for child support
must make specific findings as to the reasons that justify the deviation. Failure to do so is a reversible error.
Informal marriage (common law marriage)
(1) declaration of the marriage has been signed; or (2) the couple agreed to be married and after the agreement they lived together as spouses and represented to others they were married
proof must be commenced before the 2nd anniversary of the couple ceasing to live together, otherwise there is a rebuttable presumption the parties did not enter into an agreement to be married
community property
all property owned or claimed by either spouse during or on dissolution of the marriage. Presumption that all property is community property. Overcome presumption with clear and convincing evidence.
All property acquired during marriage, not by gift, devise, descent, or personal injury claims (not including loss wages)
Debts during marriage
presumed to be community debts unless the creditor agreed to look solely at the spouse’s separate property
separate property
property acquired before marriage OR property acquired during marriage through gift, devise, descent, or personal injury claims (not including loss wages)
gift
transfer of property made voluntarily and gratuitously, without consideration. Proponent bears burden to show it was a gift through clear and convincing evidence
(1) intent to make gift; (2) delivery; and (3) acceptance of property
inception of title
the character of an asset is determined at the time the asset is acquired.
just and right division of marital estate
is not necessarily an equal, 50/50, division.
Factors:
(1) spouse’s capacities and abilities;
(2) fault;
(3) benefits from the continuation of marriage;
(4) business opportunities;
(5) education levels;
(6) physical conditions;
(7) financial conditions and obligations;
(8) age of spouses;
(9) size of separate estates;
(10) nature of the property; and
(11) fraud against the community
community out first
even if clear and convincing evidence shows the use of SP funds, the court will apply the community out first presumption to hold community funds were expended first.
reimbursement
in cases involving expenditure of CP on one spouse’s SP, courts will recognize an equitable claim for reimbursement.
Contributions do not change the character of the property or create any ownership interest. Rather, the courts will use equitable principles to decide whether to recognize these reimbursement claims and divide them in a just and right way.
Fraud on the Community (Fraud on the Spouse)
a spouse may make reasonable gifts of community property without the other spouse’s consent, but excessive gifts can be set aside as constructive fraud of the other spouse’s community property rights.
Factors:
(1) relationship to donee;
(2) amount of gift in relation to community estate;
(3) circumstances warranting the gift;
(4) whether the gift was from the donor’s sole managing community property; AND
(5) whether the spouse is adequately provided for out of the remaining community estate
Remedies for Fraud on the Community
(1) calculate the value by which the CP was depleted as a result of the fraud and calculate the “reconstituted estate”; and (2) divide the value of the reconstituted estate between the parties in a just and right division
Alternatively, count the CP assets expended as part of the donor spouse’s share of the community estate and award the other spouse assets from the CP