Family: Theory and Policy Flashcards
(65 cards)
Murdock on Family
Family is a very important part of the organic analogy.
Meets some of society’s essential needs - family is a basic building block of society.
(Functionalism)
4 Essential Functions of Family (Murdock)
- Sexual: Stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same partner - prevents social disruption caused by sexual “free-for-all”.
- Reproduction: Reproduction of the next generation.
- Education: Socialisation of the young into the value consensus.
- Economic: Meeting members’ economic needs e.g. food and shelter.
Nuclear family is practical in meeting these 4 needs well - explains why it is universal (found in all human societies) (is this true?…)
Criticism of Murdock
Functions could be performed equally well by non-nuclear family structures or other institutions.
Feminism: Family serves the needs of men and oppresses women (think Greer, Benston, Ansley, Firestone etc)
Marxism: Family meets the needs of Capitalism, not family members or society as a whole.
Functional Fit Theory (Parsons)
The particular structure and functions of a family type will “fit” the needs of the society it is found in.
Two kinds of family structure:
Nuclear family - parents and
dependent children - fits needs of
industrial society.
Extended family - three generations under one roof - fits needs of pre-industrial society.
When Britain industrialised from late 18th century onwards, extended family gave way to the nuclear family.
Parsons claims nuclear family has become the dominant family type today.
(Functionalism)
Criticism of Functional Fit Theory:
The pre-industrial family was nuclear.
Extended family has not disappeared. It performs important functions such as financial help, childcare and emotional support, even if they are not still under one roof.
Laslett: Found late childbearing and short life expectancy meant grandparents were unlikely to be alive for very long after their first grandchild was born.
Policy Link - Fletcher
Functionalists see policies as helping families to perform their functions more effectively and make life better for their members.
March of progress view.
Fletcher: Introduction of health, education and housing policies since industrial revolution - gradually led to welfare state that supports family in performing functions, e.g. NHS - with the help of doctors, hospitals etc, the family today is better able to care for its members when they’re unwell.
(Functionalism)
Two examples of government policies that support the family/its functions
Marriage allowance reduces tax on married couples.
Child benefit helps parents to pay for caring for their children.
Parsons - Geographically Mobile and Socially Mobile Workforce
When Britain began to industrialise, the extended family gave way to the nuclear.
The needs of industrial society were different to those of pre-industrial society. The family had to meet two essential needs:
They had to be a Geographically mobile workforce and socially mobile workforce.
(Functionalism)
Geographically Mobile Workforce
In pre-industrial society: whole life in the same village, working on the same farm.
In modern society: industries spring up and decline in different parts of the country (even different parts of the world).
Requires people to move where jobs are.
It’s easier for a compact nuclear family to move than a three-generation extended family.
The nuclear family fits the needs that modern industry has.
(Parsons)
(Functionalism)
Socially Mobile Workforce
Modern, industrial society based on constantly evolving science and tech - requires skilled workforce.
Essential that talented people win promotion and take the most important jobs - even if they come from humble backgrounds.
In modern society - you have achieved status, not ascribed status. This makes social mobility possible.
Nuclear family fits needs of industrial society better than extended family in this way:
Extended family - sons live at home where father has higher ascribed status as head of the house. However, a son may achieve a higher status than his father through his job. Parsons argued this inevitably leads to tension and conflict.
Solution? Adult sons to leave home when married and form their own nuclear family - encourages social mobility (as well as geographical mobility).
This mobile nuclear family is “structurally isolated” from the extended family - may keep in touch but no longer binding obligations towards them.
Different to the past where relatives had a duty to help one another e.g. at harvest time.
(Parsons)
(Functionalism)
Parsons - Loss of Functions and Structural Differentiation
Pre-industrial family = multi-functional unit, more self-sufficient than a nuclear family. Was a unit of production - members worked together on a farm or on a family business. Was a unit of consumption - feeding, clothing its members.
When society industrialised - family lost many of its functions. Work moved into factories - family now just a unit of consumption.
Family lost some of its functions due to the creation of specialised institutions e.g. schools, health service - structural differentiation.
Examples of structural differentiation in relation to the family.
Education: Family would teach children information and skills. Now, schools are teaching students from a young age in a specialised education system with professional, qualified staff.
Healthcare: Family used to care for sick members by itself. Now, healthcare is provided to all in the UK for free, takes care of sick people and tries to cure them in a hospital.
Welfare: Family used to look after each other closely, emotionally and economically. Now, state welfare looks after those in the country who are not so well off by providing them with money and potentially emotional support.
(Functionalism)
Parsons - Irreducible Functions
Because of loss of functions - modern nuclear family now specialises in just two essential or “irreducible” functions:
1. Primary socialisation of children: Equips them with societal values so they can co-operate and integrate.
2. Stabilisation of adult personalities: The family is a place where adults can relax/release tension. Enables them to return to the workplace refreshed. Beneficial for economy. “Warm bath theory” - man comes home from a hard day working, relaxes into his family like a warm bath.
(Functionalism)
Criticisms of Parsons’ Irreducible Functions
Marxists - children are socialised into the values of Capitalism e.g. teaching children to respect authority teaches them to be passive in later live, they will not rise up against the bourgeoisie.
Feminists - women face the worst of men taking out frustrations. Ansley says wives are the “takers of shit”. Connotations of domestic violence.
Further Critique of Functionalist View of Policy
Assumes all members of family benefit equally from social policies:
Feminists argue policies often benefit men at the expense of women.
Marxists argue policies benefit the bourgeoisie because they maintain the labour force e.g. the NHS keeps workers able to work, and they prevent revolution, e.g. the welfare state “buying off” the opposition.
New Right Views on Family
Strongly favour traditional nuclear family - married, heterosexual couple, male provider and female home-maker. This family type is especially successful in the socialisation of children.
Changed since the 1960s have led to greater family diversity - this threatens the family and leads to problems such as crime and welfare dependency e.g. divorce, cohabitation, same-sex partnerships and lone parenthood.
They argue that state policies have encouraged these issues. For example, increased rights for unmarried cohabitants (e.g pensions) give the signal that marriage is not important.
New Right view on 2020 Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act (which allows divorce without fault).
The New Right believes it leads to absent fathers, a lack of role models for sons, and single mothers dependent on the state.
New Right view on Sure Start Children’s Centres (launched in 1999), giving funding and support to single mothers.
The New Right believes this leads to the State becoming the carer for the child in question, less need for the father to provide, and encourages the mother to work rather than caring for the child.
New Right view on the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, which allowed same sex marriage to be on the same level as heterosexual marriage.
The New Right believes this leads to a breakdown of the nuclear family in society, and more promiscuity.
Morgan
Successive government policies have destabilised the family - describes it as “war” between state and family.
Morgan on Marriage
Argues tax and benefit rules have been changed to remove any advantages for married couples.
State allows high divorce rates - this is damaging for children, because absent fathers = no role models for boys, no protectors for girls.
There’s been a drop in marriage - this has a negative impact on adult health, places more demand on housing, and is a strain on public services.
(New Right)
Morgan on Same-Sex Marriage
This redefines marriage as fulfilling a desire, not an institution designed to care/provide stability for children and promotes the view that marriage is not linked to becoming a parent.
Claims same sex marriages are often open relationships - Morgan argues this will encourage open relationships with heterosexual pairings, leading to infidelity and promiscuity.
(New Right)
State as the breadwinner, rather than the father
The state provides benefits to workless single parents - this is a financial incentive to separate or stay single because less is paid in benefits to two cohabiting/married parents.
(Morgan)
(New Right)
State as child carer
Increased support for childcare means mothers no longer need a male breadwinners support (i.e. he works, wife stays at home with children). This encourages women to work rather than care for their own children.
(Morgan)
(New Right)