FD SC 411 Final Flashcards

(119 cards)

1
Q

Pros: Very knowledgeable about product and consumer and may have specialized sensory training Cons: Limited availability, corrective action may be too slow/late, and they may be less inclined to downgrade the product

A

R&D/Corporate HQ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pros: Highly sensitive/accurate and less likely to be biased Cons: Corrective action could be too slow/late and hiring/training is expensive

A

Trained Panel/Employee Panel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Critical Limit

A

A maximum/minimum value to which biological, chemical, or physical parameters must be controlled at a CCP to prevent, eliminate, or reduce a food safety hazard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identify sources of variation

A

Cause and Effect Diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Variability between samples

A

Special Cause Variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of Information from a Trained Panel

A

Ratings for many different attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reversed

Visual check for normality

A

Histogram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HACCP Plan Summaries

A

Includes steps in the process that are CCPs, verification procedures, and corrective actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R&D/Corporate HQ

A

Pros: Very knowledgeable about product and consumer and may have specialized sensory training Cons: Limited availability, corrective action may be too slow/late, and they may be less inclined to downgrade the product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The percent of observations that could be expected to fall in the range x-bar +/- 1.96(sd) is equal to…

A

95%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reversed

Appraisal + Prevention + Failure

A

Cost of Quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Control Chart

A

Establish process stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Descriptive Analysis Tests

A

Answers the question: How do they differ? Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, Spectrum Uses trained panelists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A defect that reduces the product’s fitness for its intended use

A

Major Defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disposition Options of a Noncompliant Product

A

Discard it Hold it Rework it Sell to employees/donate to charity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attributes Data

A

Data that is measured on a discrete scale (integers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Answers the questions: What is the acceptability of a product?, Is one product preferred over another?, and Which aspect of the product is most important to the consumers? Central Location Test and Home Use Test

A

Affective/Hedonic Tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Control Limits

A

The voice of the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Rational Subgroup

A

A sample chosen for technical reasons within which variations may be considered to be due to common (chance) causes only; between which there may be variations due to special (assignable) causes whose presence it is possible and important to detect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Product Assessment Decision

A

Basic Elements of a Quality Control Program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

A sample chosen for technical reasons within which variations may be considered to be due to common (chance) causes only; between which there may be variations due to special (assignable) causes whose presence it is possible and important to detect

A

Rational Subgroup

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pros and Cons of Different Sensory Quality Programs

A

In/Out Pros: Easy to conduct, quick testing, cheap Cons: Doesn’t give any information Difference from Control Provides information while being easy to conduct, quick, and cost efficient Quality Rating Pros: Quick to conduct and provides information Cons: Not simple to conduct and is expensive Trained Panel Pros: Provides the most detailed/in-depth information Cons: Not simple to conduct, takes a long time to conduct/gather information, and is expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Monitoring

A

To conduct a planned sequence of observations or measurements to assess whether a CCP is under control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

An Ideal Environment for Sensory Testing

A

Well lit Free from odors, noise, and other distractions Individual evaluation in private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Special Cause Variation
Variability between samples
26
# Reversed Answers the question: Are the products perceptively different? Degree of Difference (DoD), Triangle, Tetrad, and Paired Comparison
Simple Discrimination/Difference Tests
27
Answers the question: Are the products perceptively different? Degree of Difference (DoD), Triangle, Tetrad, and Paired Comparison
Simple Discrimination/Difference Tests
28
Discard it Hold it Rework it Sell to employees/donate to charity
Disposition Options of a Noncompliant Product
29
To conduct a planned sequence of observations or measurements to assess whether a CCP is under control
Monitoring
30
The element of verification focused on the collection/evaluation of scientific and technical information to determine whether the HACCP plan, when properly implemented, will effectively control the hazard
Validation
31
Radar (spider) Graph
Visualize multidimensional data
32
Overall similarities/differences
Types of Information from an Untrained Panel
33
Answers the questions: What is the acceptability of a product?, Is one product preferred over another?, and Which aspect of the product is most important to the consumers? Central Location Test and Home Use Test
Affective/Hedonic Tests
34
Any step at which biological, chemical, or physical factors can be controlled
Control Point
35
QDA Conventional descriptive profile Spectrum
Sensory Tests (do not require a standard)
36
The portion of productive capacity used to make non-conforming product
Hidden Plant
37
A record of all corrective actions taken Determination of the cause for noncompliance Disposition of noncompliant product
Corrective Actions
38
Record Review Calibrate Observe
Daily Verification Steps
39
In/Out Pros: Easy to conduct, quick testing, cheap Cons: Doesn't give any information Difference from Control Provides information while being easy to conduct, quick, and cost efficient Quality Rating Pros: Quick to conduct and provides information Cons: Not simple to conduct and is expensive Trained Panel Pros: Provides the most detailed/in-depth information Cons: Not simple to conduct, takes a long time to conduct/gather information, and is expensive
Pros and Cons of Different Sensory Quality Programs
40
Factors Affecting the Likelihood of Occurrence of a Hazard
Effectiveness of prerequisite programs Frequency of association of the potential hazard with the food/ingredient Method of preparation Conditions during transportation Expected storage conditions Likely preparation steps before consumption Plant history
41
Cost of Quality
Appraisal + Prevention + Failure
42
Visualize relationships
Scatter Diagram
43
Variable Data
Data that is measured on a continuous scale
44
The portion of productive capacity used to make non-conforming product
Hidden Plant
45
Visualize multidimensional data
Radar (spider) Graph
46
Discard it Hold it Rework it Sell to employees/donate to charity
Disposition Options of a Noncompliant Product
47
The key to defining and solving problems
Variation
48
Preliminary Steps to Assembling a HACCP Plan
Assemble HACCP team Describe product Identify intended use Construct a flow diagram On-site confirmation of flow diagram
49
To obtain a baseline measure of response bias from your assessors To have acceptable sample results that you can statistically compare the product sample's results against
Reasons for Having a Blind Control for a Sensory Quality Program
50
A sample chosen for technical reasons within which variations may be considered to be due to common (chance) causes only; between which there may be variations due to special (assignable) causes whose presence it is possible and important to detect
Rational Subgroup
51
Answers the question: Are the products perceptively different? Degree of Difference (DoD), Triangle, Tetrad, and Paired Comparison
Simple Discrimination/Difference Tests
52
Validation
The element of verification focused on the collection/evaluation of scientific and technical information to determine whether the HACCP plan, when properly implemented, will effectively control the hazard
53
Consumer needs Reasonable expectations Non-negotiable requirements
Dimensions of Food Quality
54
HACCP Principles
Conduct a hazard analysis Identify critical control points Establish critical limits for each critical control point Establish corrective actions Establish record-keeping procedures Establish procedures for verifying the HACCP system is working
55
Pros: On site (quick evaluation/corrective action) and day to day interaction with product (high familiarity) Cons: Limited availability, may be less inclined to downgrade product
Pros/Cons of Using Plant Staff for a Sensory Quality Program
56
Hidden Plant
The portion of productive capacity used to make non-conforming product
57
Ratings for many different attributes
Types of Information from a Trained Panel
58
Includes steps in the process that are CCPs, verification procedures, and corrective actions
HACCP Plan Summaries
59
Identify sources of variation
Cause and Effect Diagram
60
Types of Sensory Quality Programs
In/Out (Pass/Fail) Difference from Control Quality Rating with Diagnostics Trained Panel
61
Establish process stability
Control Chart
62
Cause and Effect Diagram
Identify sources of variation
63
Variability between samples
Special Cause Variation
64
Reasons for Having a Blind Control for a Sensory Quality Program
To obtain a baseline measure of response bias from your assessors To have acceptable sample results that you can statistically compare the product sample's results against
65
Any step at which biological, chemical, or physical factors can be controlled
Control Point
66
Tracks movement through processes
Flow Chart
67
Variation
The key to defining and solving problems
68
Pros: On site (quick evaluation/corrective action) and day to day interaction with product (high familiarity) Cons: Limited availability, may be less inclined to downgrade product
Pros/Cons of Using Plant Staff for a Sensory Quality Program
69
Appraisal + Prevention + Failure
Cost of Quality
70
Consumer needs Reasonable expectations Non-negotiable requirements
Dimensions of Food Quality
71
Effectiveness of prerequisite programs Frequency of association of the potential hazard with the food/ingredient Method of preparation Conditions during transportation Expected storage conditions Likely preparation steps before consumption Plant history
Factors Affecting the Likelihood of Occurrence of a Hazard
72
The voice of the customer
Specification Limits
73
Important Considerations for Designing a Sensory Quality Program
The consumers (needs/expectations/experiences) The company's products, product usage Product's brand image and its importance to the company Sales volume for the product
74
Scatter Diagram
Visualize relationships
75
Establish process stability
Control Chart
76
The consumers (needs/expectations/experiences) The company's products, product usage Product's brand image and its importance to the company Sales volume for the product
Important Considerations for Designing a Sensory Quality Program
77
Basic Elements of a Quality Control Program
Product Assessment Decision
78
The maximum percent defective that is satisfactory as a process average
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
79
Pareto Chart
Prioritize projects
80
Types of Information from an Untrained Panel
Overall similarities/differences
81
Daily Verification Steps
Record Review Calibrate Observe
82
Visual check for normality
Histogram
83
1. Hazard Identification 2. Hazard Evaluation 2a. Evaluating severity 2b. Estimating the likelihood of occurrence
Hazard Analysis Steps
84
Major Defect
A defect that reduces the product's fitness for its intended use
85
A record of all corrective actions taken Determination of the cause for noncompliance Disposition of noncompliant product
Corrective Actions
86
Visualize multidimensional data
Radar (spider) Graph
87
Record Review Calibrate Observe
Daily Verification Steps
88
Data that is measured on a discrete scale (integers)
Attributes Data
89
Consumer segments make statistical analysis difficult Consumers may change their mind about what constitutes a high quality product
Challenges Associated with Using Consumer Defined Parameters
90
Sensory Tests (do not require a standard)
QDA Conventional descriptive profile Spectrum
91
Pros: Very knowledgeable about product and consumer and may have specialized sensory training Cons: Limited availability, corrective action may be too slow/late, and they may be less inclined to downgrade the product
R&D/Corporate HQ
92
Trained Panel/Employee Panel
Pros: Highly sensitive/accurate and less likely to be biased Cons: Corrective action could be too slow/late and hiring/training is expensive
93
Flow Chart
Tracks movement through processes
94
In/Out (Pass/Fail) Difference from Control Quality Rating with Diagnostics Trained Panel
Types of Sensory Quality Programs
95
Specification Limits
The voice of the customer
96
95%
The percent of observations that could be expected to fall in the range x-bar +/- 1.96(sd) is equal to...
97
A maximum/minimum value to which biological, chemical, or physical parameters must be controlled at a CCP to prevent, eliminate, or reduce a food safety hazard
Critical Limit
98
Data that is measured on a discrete scale (integers)
Attributes Data
99
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
The maximum percent defective that is satisfactory as a process average
100
The voice of the process
Control Limits
101
The system of means to economically produce goods/services which satisfy customer requirements at the corporate level
Quality Assurance
102
Corrective Actions
A record of all corrective actions taken Determination of the cause for noncompliance Disposition of noncompliant product
103
Dimensions of Food Quality
Consumer needs Reasonable expectations Non-negotiable requirements
104
Data that is measured on a continuous scale
Variable Data
105
Pros/Cons of Using Plant Staff for a Sensory Quality Program
Pros: On site (quick evaluation/corrective action) and day to day interaction with product (high familiarity) Cons: Limited availability, may be less inclined to downgrade product
106
Conduct a hazard analysis Identify critical control points Establish critical limits for each critical control point Establish corrective actions Establish record-keeping procedures Establish procedures for verifying the HACCP system is working
HACCP Principles
107
Quality Assurance
The system of means to economically produce goods/services which satisfy customer requirements at the corporate level
108
Control Point
Any step at which biological, chemical, or physical factors can be controlled
109
Affective/Hedonic Tests
Answers the questions: What is the acceptability of a product?, Is one product preferred over another?, and Which aspect of the product is most important to the consumers? Central Location Test and Home Use Test
110
Simple Discrimination/Difference Tests
Answers the question: Are the products perceptively different? Degree of Difference (DoD), Triangle, Tetrad, and Paired Comparison
111
Challenges Associated with Using Consumer Defined Parameters
Consumer segments make statistical analysis difficult Consumers may change their mind about what constitutes a high quality product
112
Hazard Analysis Steps
1. Hazard Identification 2. Hazard Evaluation 2a. Evaluating severity 2b. Estimating the likelihood of occurrence
113
Well lit Free from odors, noise, and other distractions Individual evaluation in private
An Ideal Environment for Sensory Testing
114
The voice of the customer
Specification Limits
115
Histogram
Visual check for normality
116
Answers the question: How do they differ? Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, Spectrum Uses trained panelists
Descriptive Analysis Tests
117
Prioritize projects
Pareto Chart
118
Well lit Free from odors, noise, and other distractions Individual evaluation in private
An Ideal Environment for Sensory Testing
119
Assemble HACCP team Describe product Identify intended use Construct a flow diagram On-site confirmation of flow diagram
Preliminary Steps to Assembling a HACCP Plan