Federal Judicial Power Flashcards
(34 cards)
Standing definition
the issue of whether the plaintiff is the proper party to bring a matter to the court for adjudication.
Standing elements
- Injury
- Causation
- Redressability
Injury element of standing requires
P must allege and prove she personally suffered:
- Actual injury OR
- Imminently will be injured
Plaintiffs seeking injunctive or declaratory relief must show
likelihood of future harm
Causation element of standing requires
P must allege and prove that D caused the injury
Redressability element of standing requires
P must allege and prove that a favorable court decision is likely to remedy the injury
Rule on third-party standing
P cannot assert claims of third parties not before the court.
Exceptions:
1. Close relationship between P and injured 3P
- Injured 3P is unlikely to be able to assert own rights
- Organization may sue for members if: (a) members have standing to sue, (b) interests are germane to org. purpose, and (c) neither claim/relief requires individual member participation
Standing rule on general grievances
No generalized grievances - P can’t sue as a citizen/taxpayer interested in having the government follow the law
Taxpayer exceptions to no generalized grievances rule
Taxpayers have standing to:
1) Establishment Clause challenge of government expenditures pursuant to federal/state/local statutes
2) Challenge their tax bill
Ripeness definition
whether a federal court may grant pre-enforcement review of a statute or regulation
When considering ripeness, court considers:
- HARDSHIP suffered without pre-enforcement review
- FITNESS of issues and the record for judicial review (does court have all it needs to decide the issue?)
Mootness definition
If events after the filing of a lawsuit end the plaintiff’s injury, the case must be dismissed as moot.
Exceptions to mootness
- Wrongs capable of repetition, but evading review
- D voluntary cessation of offending conduct
- Class action - named P’s claim becomes moot but any other member has ongoing injury
Political Question Doctrine
Federal courts will NOT adjudicate constitutional violations based on political questions such as:
- “Republican Form of Government” Clause”
- President’s conduct of foreign policy
- impeachment and removal process
- partisan gerrymandering
SCOTUS holding on Political Question Doctrine
SCOTUS says challenging the validity of a federal statute should NOT be dismissed as PQ - even if case involves dispute between branches of federal government regarding foreign affairs.
Advisory opinions and federal courts
Article III bars a federal court from issuing advisory opinions
SCOTUS has appellate jurisdiction in:
all cases to which federal power extends, subject to congressional exceptions and regulations
Ways a case can come to SCOTUS
- Writ of Certiorari
- Appeal
Most cases come to SCOTUS by
Writ of Certiorari
Cases that come to SCOTUS by writ of certiorari are:
1) State court case deciding constitutional issue AND
2) All cases from federal courts of appeals
Cases by writ of certiorari - must SCOTUS hear?
SCOTUS has complete discretion to hear
Cases by appeal - must SCOTUS hear?
SCOTUS must hear
Cases that come to SCOTUS by appeal are:
confined to decisions by three-judge federal district court panels that grant or deny injunctive relief.
cases where a party (or both parties) is a state: who has jurisdiction?
SCOTUS has original and EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction