Federalism Flashcards
(37 cards)
three systems of govt
unitary, confederate, and federal
unitary govt
- centralized system of govt in which all power is vested in a central govt
- Great Britain, France, and China
confederate govt
- decentralized system of govt in which weak central govt has limited power over the states
- US began as this under AoC
- United Nations
federal govt
system of fort in which power is dived by a written constitution between a central got and regional govts (2+ levels of govt have formal authority over the same area and people)
-US, Mexico, Canada, Germany, and India
expressed powers (enumerated powers)
granted to federal govt by the constitution
Congress’s expressed powers
Article 1, Section 8 (27 different powers)
President’s expressed powers
Article 2, Section 2
Supreme expressed powers
Article 3
key expressed powers
- power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce
- power to tax and spend
- war power
implied powers
- not expressly stated in the Constitution
- Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18 (elastic clause) - all laws necessary and proper to execute powers
- enables the national govt to meet probe the Framers could not anticipate (insured growth of national power by enabling federal govt to extend powers beyond the Constitution)
inherent powers
- derive from the fact that the US is a sovereign nation
- international law: all nation-states have the right to make treaties, wage war, and acquire territory
reserved powers
- held solely by states
- 10th amendment (not delegated to US, nor prohibited to states - reserved to the states/people)
- ex) licensing doctors, establishing public schools and local govts
- ex)police power - authority of a state to protect and promote the public morals, health, safety, and general welfare
concurrent powers
- exercised by both national and state govts
- power to tax, borrow money, and establish courts
prohibited powers
- denied to national govts, states, or both
- federal govt cannot tax exports, and states cannot make treaties with foreign countries
“the cardinal question”
- the relationship between the national govt and the states is the “cardinal question of our constitutional system” (Wilson)
- a new question emerges every generation b/c development occurs
background of the McCulloch v. Maryland case
- Congress chartered the Second National Bank of the US in 1816
- 1818 - Maryland legislature passed a law imposing a substantial tax on the operation of the Baltimore branch of the bank
- James McCulloch refused to pay tax (cashier of Baltimore branch)
- Maryland state courts ruled against him, but McCulloch appealed to US Supreme Court
constitutional questions raised by McCulloch case
- Does the Constitution permit Congress to charter a bank?
2. Does a state have a constitutional right to tax an agency of the US govt?
McCulloch court’s decision
- led by Chief Justice John Marshall
- creating a national bank was within the implied powers of Congress
- but “bank” is not in the constitution
- uses the necessary and proper clause to say that creating a bank carried out its enumerated powers of imposing taxes, issuing a currency, and borrowing money
- however, Maryland law was unconstitutional bc violated the supremacy of the national govt to level a tax
significance of McCulloch case
- confirmed right of congress to use implied power to carry out expressed powers
- ex) build interstate highways, regulate labor-management relations, and inspect food and drugs
- supremacy of national govt over states (states cannot interfere with or tax the legitimate activities of the federal govt)
nullification
John Calhoun of SC - state can nullify or refuse to recognize an act of Congress that it considered unconstitutional
the Civil War and its effect on nullification
- conflict over slavery and a dispute over the relationship between the Southern states and the national govt
- refuted the doctrine of nullification while also confirming that the federal union is indissoluble
Background of Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
- NY legislature granted Aaron Ogden an “exclusive license” to run ferry service on the Hudson River between NY and NJ
- Thomas Gibbons obtained a license from the federal govt to operate a competing NY-NJ ferry service
- Ogden claimed Gibbons infringed on the monopoly rights granted to him by the NY legislature
- NY courts ruled against him; Gibbons appealed to SC
constitutional questions of the Gibbons v. Ogden case
- Did the NY law violate the Constitution by attempting to regulate interstate commerce?
- Does Congress have the exclusive right to regulate interstate commerce?
Court’s decision in Gibbons case
- commerce: all commercial business dealings (includes production, buying, selling, renting, and transporting of goods, service, and property)
- because congress regulates all interstate com mere, the Court upheld Gibbons’s right to operate a ferry service in competition with Ogden