Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

philosophy 7 final > final > Flashcards

final Flashcards

1
Q

first conceivability argument

A

an argument for dualism
1. if i can conceive of some state of affairs, then that state of affairs is possible (meaning that god can bring it about
2. i can conceive of myself as existing without a body
therefore,
3. it is possible for me to exist without my body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

second conceivability argument (with leibnizs law)

A

an argument for dualism
1. if i can conceive of some state of affairs without contradiction, then that state of affairs is possible (god can bring it about)
2. i can conceive of myself as existing without my body
therefore,
3. it is possible for me to exist without my body
but,
4. it is not possible for my body to exist without my body existing
hence (by leibnizs law),
5. i am distinct from my body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

arnaulds triangle

A

an argument against the conceivability argument

just because something could be conceived of does not show that the state of affairs is possible

i.e. i can conceive of a right triangle where the hypotenuse is not the sum of the squares of the squares of the two sides
conceivability does not imply possibility (illegitimate slide from one to the other)
this is metaphysically impossible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

metaphysical possibility vs. metaphysical impossibility

A

possibility - saying that this is the way that the world might have been

impossibility - saying that this is not a way that the world could have been

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does it mean if a state of affairs is conceivable?

A

means that we can coherently think about it

  • it could be conceivable without contradiction if it does not involve any kind of logical or definitional incoherence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

three levels of skeptical doubt about the external world

A
  1. perceptual error
  2. the dreaming argument
  3. the evil demon scenario
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the dreaming argument

A
  1. if there is no way to tell that i am dreaming, then we cannot know anything about the external world on the basis of perception
  2. there is no way to know if we are dreaming
    therefore,
  3. we cannot know anything about the external world on the basis of perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

three levels of skepticism of other minds

A
  1. lies, self deception, misunderstandings, etc.
  2. systematic deception
  3. zombies; automata
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the inverted spectrum

A

how do i know that my perception of an object is the same as anothers perception of that same object?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

metaphysics vs. epistemology

A

metaphysics studies the nature, constitution, and structure of reality
epistemology studies our ability to acquire knowledge or justified beliefs about reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

argument from analogy

A
  1. a usually causes b, and usually only a causes b
  2. b occured
    therefore,
  3. a also occurred

ex.
lightning usually causes thunder, and usually only lightning causes thunder.
thunder occurred.
therefore,
lightning also occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

idealism

A

the thesis that all reality is a construct out of mental phenomena
-the external world is completely dependent upon human perception of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how is idealism counterintuitive?

A

because its hard to sell that the physical world is noon existent without us looking at it all of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how did berkeley invoke god to defend idealism

A

says that god perceives everything all of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

valid argument

A

when the premises guarantee the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

invalid argument

A

when the premises do not entail the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

modus ponens

A

if p, therefore, q
p,
therefore q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

behaviorism

A

the idea that there is nothing more to the mind than its behavioral dispositions
-applies to the if and only if statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

disposition

A

a tendency to react in certain ways when placed in certain circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

behavioral disposition

A

tendency to exhibit certain type of behavior under certain circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

super spartans

A

an refutation to behaviorisms “if and only if” pain statement
being in pain does not constitute the behavioral disposition of pain
warriors in sparta did not do that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

the amensia argument

A

suppose i have amnesia

  1. if i can conceive of a state of affairs, then that state of affairs is possible
  2. i can conceive of a world where imani davenport does not exist
    therefore,
  3. it is possible for me to exist without imani davenport exisiting
    but,
  4. it is not possible for imani davenport to exists without imani davenport existing
    hence, (by leibnizs law)
  5. i am not imani davenport
  • this illustrates how the slide from conceivability to possibility can generate fallacies and philosophical errors
23
Q

the continuity of nature

A

an objection to dualism

  • dualism presents that to have a soul and to have a body are different, and that the soul is on a different ancestral plane
  1. there is no sharp boundary between thinking and non - thinking beings
  2. there is no big difference between creatures that speak a language and creatures who dont
24
Q

the ontological argument

A
  1. i can conceive of a perfect deity
  2. a deity that exists is more perfect than a deity that does not exist
    therefore,
  3. the deity that i am conceiving
25
Q

cogito, ergo sum

A

“i think, therefore i am”
- the fact that i am thinking constitutes that i exist in the first place

26
Q

god no deceiver

A

god would never want to deceive you, used as a refutation to the third level of skepticism about external world

27
Q

dualism

A

the doctrine that thinking persons have non physical souls that are completely distinct from their physical bodies
-physical stuff is separate from the mental stuff and the mind is not contained in physical space, rather than outside of the universe

28
Q

the argument from doubt

A
  1. can doubt the existence of my brain and my body
  2. i cannot doubt the existence of my mind
    therefore,
  3. my mind is not the same thing as my brain or my body
    -conclusion claims dualism
    -mind and body do not share at least one property
    -leibnizs law
    uses a wrong version of it
29
Q

leibnizs law

A
  1. a has certain properties
  2. b does not have certain properties
  3. therefore, a and b are not the same thing

ex.

  1. the murderer is wearing a purple suit
  2. batman is not wearing a purple suit
  3. therefore, the murderer is not batman
30
Q

interactionism

A

the doctrine that the mind can enter into causal interactions with the physical world

31
Q

why is interactionism intuitive?

A

your mind automatically reasons with this
why did i go to drive to the airport? because i needed to pick my friend up from the airport?
why did i feel pain? because someone punched me in the face?

32
Q

causal overdetermination

A

every physical event has a physical cause and a mental cause, meaning that every event or state of affairs has multiple causes for one event
-if a given bodily movement also has a mental cause (interactionism) then the movement would be causally overdetermined

33
Q

epiphenomenalism

A

the doctrine that ones mind exerts no causal impact upon ones body
-if we accept dualism, then it seems difficult to avoid epiphenomanalism

34
Q

if we support both dualism and interactionism, then..

A
  1. the mind can interfere with the physical forces impacting the body, thus violating the laws of physics
  2. the mind simply reinforces the physical forces impacting the body, thus entailing massive causal overdetermination
    -meaning that the mind and the body can be out of sync by telling us to do separate things
35
Q

occasionalism

A

the idea that our actions that are done by our body are caused by god
-god makes the body move and is the causal interaction between the two (inteferes with the idea of a closed system)

36
Q

pre established harmony

A

idea that god set up the universe from the beginning in two parts (mind and body universe), kind of making a two track world
-they develop according to their own principles
-no causal interaction between them but appears so
-if i want water, god set things up so that there is me being thirsty, and the moment that the track evolves to be thirsty, the physical track simultaneous evolves to move and get water
-physical occurrences look like they are being caused by mental occurrences, but they mesh together and operate on their own terms

37
Q

clock example of pre established harmony

A

clocks that tell the same time do not communicate with each other, but the clockmaker set it up so that the time is the same on all of the clocks
-appears to be a causal interaction between the two, but in reality it is pre established that they are working at the same time

38
Q

materialism

A

the doctrine that everything that exists is physical or material

39
Q

monism

A

the world contains only one type of stuff
-some monists claim that the world contains only mental stuff
- other monists claim that the world contains only physical stuff
- they strongly believe in one or another

40
Q

consciousness

A

the qualitative aspect of experience (what it is like to knowing something vs. just knowing something)

41
Q

mary argument

A
  1. mary knows all of the physical facts concerning human color vision before leaving the black and white room
  2. but, there are some facts about human color vision that mary does not know before leaving the black and white room
    therefore,
  3. there are non - physical facts concerning human color vision
    -no way to collect data of consciousness or what it is like to experience something
42
Q

how does the mental supervene on the physical?

A

with the idea of supervenience

-that if two entities share all of the same physical properties, then they also share all of the same mental properties
-minimal version of materialism
“i believe in materialism, but i think that there are beings out there where their physical properties could be the same, but their mind could be saying different things” how does that work?

if one person is in pain, then the other person must be in pain if they are both hold their foot and crying out in what seems to be pain
this is what people say when the mental supervenes on the physical

43
Q

why do philosophers think that dualism leads to epiphenomenalism?

A

dualists are forced into epi because it would be an interference from something outside of physical laws if the soul were to intervene upon the body
therefore, they must accept that the mind has no causal impact on the body

44
Q

how does the inverted spectrum pose a difficulty for the thesis that the mental supervenes upon the physical?

A

the idea of the inverted spectrum presents that the mental does not exactly supervene upon the physical; things with the same physical properties do not have the same mental properties

45
Q

the turing test

A

game that had people guess whether or not the thing that they were talking to was a robot or a human
-also called the imitation games
-turing believes that we will be able to build a machine that passes the test and is capable of passing as human

46
Q

blockhead argument against machine passes = it can think idea

A

blockhead is a computer that is fed sentences, and is programmed to respond back in a human manner
- if he passes the test, that does not mean that he is thinking but he is just programmed that way

47
Q

the computational theory of mind

A

the mind is just a computer made up of neurons
-mental activity is just computational activity

48
Q

what do people think makes the mind computational?

A

syntactic manipulation (like robots)

48
Q

chinese room thought experiment

A

argument against the computational theory
-man put in a room where he knows syntactically how to put the chinese words together but he cannot speak chinese
difference between syntax and semantics
(representational and qualitative)

49
Q

chinese room argument

A
  1. syntax is not sufficient for semantics
  2. minds have semantics i.e. representational properties
  3. computer programs are entirely defined by their formal syntactical structure
    therefore,
  4. instantiating a program by itself is never sufficient for having a mind
50
Q

the systems reply

A

the person doesnt understand chinese, but the system as a whole does understand chinese (part of a larger system, i.e. the guy, the rulebook, the pencil, the piece of paper)

51
Q

the robot reply

A

for humans, there is syntax and semantics
-causal interaction with the world is also needed for semantics
-however this is all consistent with the computational theory of mind
- think of it like a robot
-robot is performing syntactic manipulation
-also has causal interaction with the world (representational aspects)
-not a computer, but a robot that has things like limbs, a camera, etc. then semantics can be experienced

52
Q

epistemic vs. practical reasons for belief

A

epistemic reasons are about if you believe that you can do something through knowledge
- practical reasons are realistic

53
Q

pascals wager

A

argument that we should practically believe that god exists, because it is in your best interest to believe in this

  1. i believe that god exists, and god exists (eternal salvation)
  2. i believe that god exists and god does not exist (no afterlife)
  3. i do not believe that god exists and god exists (eternal damnation)
  4. i do not believe that god exists and god does not exist (no afterlife, no punishment or reward)

philosophy 7 final (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions