Final Flashcards

1
Q

How do you select between alternatives when a present or analysis is used?

A

You use the MARRRI and solve for present worth a single project is economically justified if present worth is greater than than zero and you select the alternative with the largest present worth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you evaluate projects or compare alternatives when capitalized cost is used

A

This is present worth with the service period of infinity. You use the MARR or I and your Cost needs to be greater than zero for single project to be economically justified select the alternative with the largest capital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do you select an alternative when using future worth?

A

Do you use an MARR or interest rate and you calculate the future worth a single project is economically justified a future worth is greater than zero and you select the alternative with the largest future worth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do you evaluate projects when using annual worth?

A

You use the MARR or interest rate and you look for a project with an annual worth greater than zero for it to be economically justified then you select the alternative with the largest annual worth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Return on invest

A

ROI represents an alternative approach to comparing alternatives and in theory it can be used instead of the approaches covered earlier in the course

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

External rate of return

A

If you have to discard both values when using an ROR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did the conclusion recommendations change based on approach?

A

All approaches will lead to the same conclusion or recommendation provided that the least common multiple method rather than the study period method is used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the issues with ROI?

A

In some cases, ROI will give more than one potential numerical result which may differ from other methods. That’s an engineering economic analysis. The preferred methods are not ROI. All is ideally used to supplement where decision makers are specifically interested in understanding ROI, but it is not recommended as the primary basis for making decisions on a project or comparing alternatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rate of return

A

ROR is the rate paid on the unpaid balance of borrowed money for example a loan at $1000 and an interest rate of 10% is to be repaid and equal installments over four years. Each of the four years the interest rate is applied to the unpaid balance of borrowed money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal rate of return

A

IROR. The interest rate i* that makes present worth annual worth future worth of a cash flow series 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does RoR different from present worth capitalized cost future worth and annual worth?

A

The four methods use cash flows and MARR. Whereas ROR uses one input, which is cash flows and does not consider an interest rate. Single projects are economically justified if I is greater than MARR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Using ror

A

ROR assumes any net positive cash flows are reinvested at the interest rate. For projects where I is substantially different to MARR reinvestment at I may be unrealistic. The calculation of eye is more labor-intensive than the calculations for other methods. Non-conventional cash flow can kneeled multiple eye values and then some cases ROR analysis does not lead to a usable eye and it is necessary to resort to EROR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recommendation aboutRoR

A

It is not recommended as the primary method for analysis. It should only be used supplementary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Incremental cash flow

A

We need to consider the difference in cash for every year in our evaluation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Incremental cash flow

A

= cash flow larger than initial investment-cash flow smaller than initial investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Logic for incremental ROR analysis

A

Find i* for both alternatives. Is that greater than the MARR? if no reject alternatives. If yes, find the incremental change or Delta eye to determine whether that additional expense can be justified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the incremental cash full capture?

A

How the alternative with the higher initial investment differs from the alternative with the lower initial investment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Incremental ROR for more than two alternatives

A
  1. Order alternatives from smallest to largest initial investment.
  2. Calculate i* of the CF and eliminate all values lower than the MARR. Remaining alternative with lowest cost is the defender.
  3. Determine CF between defender and challenger, which is the next lowest alternative. Set up incremental RR relations using present worth annual worth or future worth.
  4. Calculate. Delta i* on incremental CF using factors or IRR function.
  5. If. Delta i* is greater than MARR eliminate defender challenger becomes new defender against next alternative if high is less than MIRR remove challenger defender remains alternative remains
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Public sector project

A

Is a product service or system used financed and owned by the citizens of a government level. The project is designed and constructed to serve citizens for the public good at no profit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Public sector project terminologies

A

C-cost estimated expenses to government unit
B-benefits, estimated advantages to be experienced by the public
D-benefits, undesirable consequences to public
i-discount rate term used instead of interest rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The point or perspective on public projects

A

Must be determined before cost for benefit or dis benefit estimates are made their typically several potential viewpoints and the perspective taken may result in cash flows being classified differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Types of contracts for public sector projects

A

Contractor does not share in the project risk or contractor shares in project risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Contractor does not share and project risk

A

Fixed price contract lump sum payment cost reimbursable contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Contractor shares and project risk
Design build projects contractors take on more than one function from the design staged operating stage. Design build finance maintain operate projects requires a contractor to perform all of the activities with collaboration and approval of the owner.
26
B/C analysis of a single project approaches
Conventional B/C ratio or modified B/C ratio
27
Conventional B/C ratio
B/C = B-D /C
28
Modified B/C ratio
B/C = B-D-M&O costs/ Initial investment -savage value
29
How to determine if a B/C project is economically justified
FB/C is greater than or equal to one
30
Incremental B/C analysis for two mutually exclusive alternatives
Almost the same as an anchor mental analysis alternatives are ordered by increasing equivalent total costs. Errors and B/C can occur if alternatives are ordered by cost first or initial investment only.
31
Steps for incremental B/C analysis for mutually exclusive alternatives
1) order alternatives by equivalent cost. For this illustration, we assume X has a lower annual worth cost calculate B/C for comparison X versus DN. If B/sees less than one keep the option and compare why versus DN if B/C is greater than or equal to one X and incrementally compare why versus X.calculate B/CY for comparison of if it’s greater than one select why if it’s less than one select X
32
Incremental B/C analysis for multiple alternatives
Determine equivalent total cost for each alternative using present worth annual worth or future worth. Order alternatives by increasing equivalent total cost smallest first. Determine B and D for each alternative for direct benefits. If only direct benefits are estimated calculate B/C for each alternative and eliminate all with values less than one.calculate change and see change in B and change in D between two order alternatives. Calculate change and B divided by change and see if it’s greater than one higher cost alternative becomes defender to new challenger repeat until one alternative remains.
33
Profitability index
Used primarily for revenue projects and private sector were the benefits are not considered. Close relation to modified B/C ratio since revenue in the private sector are about the same as in the public sector. The PI is also called the present worth index PWI and is often used to assist in the selection of independent projects on Budget is limitedgreater than one project is economically justified if PI is less than one it is not acceptable
34
Cost effectiveness analysis
Combines monetary cost estimates with non-monetary benefit estimates using a measure of worth that is termed cost effectiveness measure or cost effectiveness ratio useful for service sector project where it’s difficult to estimate the economic benefits.
35
Service sector project
Our systems or processes that provide services to individuals, businesses or government units. They primarily involve the intangibles of the system or process not the physical facilities.
36
Cost effectiveness ratio
CER. Smaller CER values are better for the same level of effectiveness.
37
Break even analysis and payback analysis
Complementary analysis in engineering economics so they do not replace present or future worth annual worth based analysis instead, they complement by providing additional insight that is not provided previously
38
Benefits of breaking even a payback analysis
Finding the number of units that need to be produced a facility for the cost to equal the revenue. This is a break even analysis for one project. Deciding whether to outsource production typically a higher cost per unit with low to no fixed cost or produce in house. This is break even an ass for two projects. Determining what point and time the revenue is generated by an investment will equal the initial investment. this is a payback analysis for one project and determining the number of units that need to be produced in facility to achieve payback by specified moment and time current break even and payback analysis .
39
Symbols for payback and break even analysis
Qbe- break even quantity for one parameter/decision variable FC- fixed cost i.e. cost that does not vary as the number of units produced ferries VC total variable cost i.e. the total cost that vary in line with the number of units produced varies- variable cost per unit produced R-total revenue r-revenue per unit produced np-payback period
40
Introduction to break even analysis and payback cost
They do not require specialized formulas. Instead we perform based on general analytical skill set formulating an equation that contains a variable to represent an unknown value and solving for that variable and understanding of engineering, economic analysis concepts.
41
Reasons why I replacement study is necessary
One of the most common and important issues and industrial practices is that a replacement or retention of an asset process or system that is currently installed. The fundamental question answered by replacement/retention study about a current installed system is should the system be replaced now or later if the system should be replaced later, when should it be replaced?annual and replacement studies
42
Replacements study terminology basics
Defender D Challenger C Market value MV Economic service life n Defender first cost Challenger first cost Non-owners viewpoint Study period or planning horizon
43
Defender
D. Currently installed asset.
44
Challenger
See. Best potential replacement for defender.
45
Market value
MV. Value of defender is sold on open market.
46
Economic service life
n. Number of years at which lowest annual worth of cost occurs.
47
Defender first cost
Current MOV of defender used as first cost of D in analysis
48
Challenger first cost
Cost to recover for a challenger usually it’s P value
49
Non-owner viewpoint
Outsider viewpoint for objectivity
50
Study period are planning horizon
Specified time period for replacement study
51
Replacement study basics
The services provided by each alternative are required for the indefinite future. The challenger is the best available alternative to replace the defender. Once the challenger has replaced the defender, the challenger can be used for successive life cycles with all costs repeated similar to applying the LCM for an alternative with a shorter period of service. The cost estimates for every lifecycle of the defender and challenger will be the same as in their first cycle.
52
Replacement study basics
Some costs are ignored as they are not relevant to this decision that must be made. The non-owner of viewpoint is employed assumes that service provided by the fender can be purchased by making an initial investment that is equal to the market value of the defender, also known as the opportunity cost approach, the first cost of the challenger can be calculated
53
Replacement study basics
The formula that is used to determine the cost of the challenger ensures that the market value of the defender is not included in cash flows that are associated with the challenger. Instead, this market value forms part of the cash flow of the defender are a portion of this way, because it is highly likely that the challenger and the defender have different end values, when comparing to alternatives who want to spread the cash flow associated with the market value over the remaining service of the defender service of the challenger
54
What are the two types of replacement studies?
The study period is specified and the study period is not specified i.e. indefinite future
55
Setting up a replacement study over a specified.
Ensure that we have a solution in place for the specified period of study one that defenders life is shorter than the study. Another solution needs to replace it for the remainder of the study. Most likely the challenger. Capital recovery is calculated appropriately when the challengers life is longer than the study. Period, we need to use an appropriate and to calculate the capital recovery
56
Economic service life
Number of years in at which the equivalent annual worth of costs is the minimum
57
Keynotes for economic service life ESL
Capital recovery decreases as more years are considered. Annual worth of AOC increases as more years are considered. ESL is located at the lowest value of the sum.
58
Incorporating tax and replacement analysis
Performing replacement analysis on after tax cash flows has beyond the scope of the course however, two aspects are often relevant to replacement analysis have a financial impact that is only observed when and after tax analysis is performed that is depreciation and is resulting from replacement trade-in value
59
Cost of capital
The cost of capital is the weighted average interest rate paid based on the proportion of investment capital from debt and equity sources
60
MARR
The MARR is set relative to the cost of capital MARR can be set for one project a series of projects or the entire company and MAR our value changes overtime due to changing circumstances it’s a reasonable rate of return established for the evaluation and selection of alternatives. The project is not economically viable unless it is expected to return at least the MAR.
61
Debt capital
Represents boring from outside the company
62
Debt financing
Includes boring via bonds loans and mortgages. The lender does not share in the profits made using the debt funds, but there is risk in that the borrowed or could default on part or all of the borrowed funds.
63
Equity capital is corporate money comprised of the funds of owners and retained earnings. Owners funds are further classified as money obtained from the scale of stocks or owners capital for private nonstop. Issuing companies retained earnings or funds previously retained in the corporation for capital investment.
64
Impact of tax rates on MARR
If corporate taxes are rising pressure to increase the MRR is present use of after tax analysis may assist in eliminating this reason for a fluctuating MARR since accompanying business expenses will tend to decrease taxes and after tax cost
65
D-E mix and weighted average coc
The equity identifies percentages of debt and equity financing. It can be calculated for project several projects or for an organization. The WAC is determined in line with the DE mix as follows WAC is equal to the equity fraction times the cost of equity plus step fraction times the cost of debt most firms operate over range ofmixes
66
Debt financing
Includes boring through loans or issuance of bonds bond, dividends and loan interest payments are tax deductible as corporate expenses. This reduces the income base on which taxes are calculated with end result of less taxes paid. Therefore the cost of that capital is reduced because there is annual tax savings.
67
Cost of debt capital
The annual tax savings linked to the cost of debt financing is calculated as follows. Tax savings equals expenses times effective tax rate. And the equation the effective tax rate is a combination of federal state and local tax rates. They are reduced to a single number to simplify computations this tax saving is subtracted from corporate expenses in order to calculate the net cash flow.
68
Parameter
A variable or factor for which an estimated or stated value is necessary
69
Sensitivity analysis
And analysis to determine how measure of worth changes when one or more perimeters fairies over selected range of values
70
General procedure for sensitivity analysis
One select parameter to analyze. Assume independent with other parameters. Two select probable range and increment. Three select measure of worth. Four calculate measure of worth values. Five interpret results graph of measure versus parameter helps understand sensitivity.
71
Sensitivity of several parameters
Sensitivity of several parameters for one alternative are better understood when graphed as percent change from the most likely estimate for each perimeter versus measure of worth
72
Three estimate sensitivity analysis
Applied when selecting one ME alternative from two or more. For each parameter to be analyze, provide three estimates of pessimistic most likely and an optimistic estimate.
73
Multi attribute considerations
The starting point is to find the set of attributes that will be taken into consideration. Three principles that generate a higher quality of attributes, no missions, no redundancies and decompose ability. Next normalized set of weights is defined so that the sum is equal to one then an evaluation measure is defined for each attribute, then rate each proposal based on each attribute using applicable evaluation measures normalize the evaluation of all attributes retain a set of data where each attribute is evaluated using a consistent scale take a moment to consider complete the proposals based on
74
The weight some approach
The weighted some approach indicates which are recommended proposal should be as important to realize that a recommended based on a multi criteria decision and an analysis approach is much less clearcut than a recommendation purely based on financial measures of fourth
75
Normalization approaches
Divide by the largest value, range, normalization, Z scores, or dividing by the total
76
Range normalization, and the z scores
Proportionality is not maintained
77
Three problematic characteristics of weighted sum
Ranking reversal due to change and normalization approach, rank reversal due to removal of unwanted candidates, and all rounders overlooked in favor of unbalanced candidates
78
Weighted product approach
As an alternative to the weighted summer approach awaited product approach can be applied. The advantage of weighted product approach is its dimension list. There are no need for normalization of a valuation measures. Different attributes can be measured on different scales. Rescaling has no effect on the outcome effect of raiders rating inconsistently is dressed more effectively and it’s less susceptible to the line trap.
79