Final Flashcards
(384 cards)
Homans “exchange relationship” and possible evolution
two people will be in a relationship when each gets something out of the relationship; sometimes these relatonhips become institutionalized, incorporated into a bureaucracy, social relations; sometimes this will lead to them being more friendship instead of just transactional
What type of way of thinking is “exchange relationship”
- Way to think about society/social structure as series of ties between individuals, groups, nation states
Georg Simmel features of a dyad (3)
Group dissolved as soon as one person decides
High levels intimacy (less room for play acting, low secrecy, you know who took the beer in the fridge)
Egalitarianism (otherwise you would leave)
George Simmel features of a triad (4)
- birth of politics (two people can form coalition)
- birth of secrecy
- creates new roles (mediator, arbitror when two people disagreeing)
- One of the parties could take advantage of other two (third world countries milking USA/Soviets)
Simmel’s typology of groups
Small group
Party
Large group
Simmel small group (and examples)
people in face-to-face contact that critically have shared focus of attention, all doing some thing,
ex. Old Cuban men playing cards together; egalitarian/friendship organizations generally. A lot of symbolic interactionist studies focus on small groups.
Simmel parties (3)
like a cocktail people, people milling around;
multiple foci of attention, very different interaction patterns, people focused on different things,
probably great increase in social complexity
Simmel large group (2)
governed more formally, often by written rules
tend to be status distinctions and formal roles/procedures
What is Charles Horton Cooley’s typology of groups
primary and secondary groups
Cooley Primary groups (3)
very important to invidual
members not replaceable
enduring intense ties that involve many aspects of social life
Cooley secondary groups
Take up much less of life, maybe only one segment
Examples of Cooley secondary groups
*work friends - if one retires or takes job elsewhere, less devastating than losing family member; professional sports teams that swap players
Difference in how people will behave between Cooley’s primary and secondary groups
Generally make bigger sacrifices for primary group
Reference group (2)
who you benchmark yourself against
psychological category and has implications for self-esteem
Why is reference group significant for sociological research?
(have to keep this in mind when asking questions in sociology, since don’t know what reference group people have in mind when ask questions like do you think you make enough money)
Example of reference group
o Immigration example: new immigrants often use people back in original country as reference group, and then people from original country that moved to the new country; but people’s children often benchmark against the people they go to school with.
in-group and out-group (subjective meaning)/example
People that are like you/not like you (maybe determined on basis of race, people in same denomination, etc.)
In group and out-group (power-relations meaning)/example
society has in-group (powerful people) and out-group (marginalized people) – often used in contexts with ethnicity involved, ethnic minority and majority (in-group might be ethnic group in power
Examples of in and out groups (2)
Italians/Jews went from out group to in group in terms of power when becoming honorary white people; or like in England, new outgroup is Middle Eastern people, whereas Black/Afro/Caribbean people are now part of ingroup – maybe due to personal relationships, colleagues, sports – Black people now seen as “truly” English),
Hutus vs. Tutsis
Examples of the sorts of things networks can influence/we can ivestigate (3)
Information cascades like parents talking about autism
social norms creeping through networks
remittances with migrants in US sending money back to family back home
Diffusion/example
things in networks tend to diffuse out in a very broad way (like belief in the Qanon conspiracy)
Ways to measure diffusion through a network (5)
Past behaviors (ask people who did they contact/meet/see, maybe in survey, source of information)
survey (who did you meet last week/how many times in week have you met certain people),
hypotheticals (imagine you needed to buy 10 dollar for bus fare, which of five friends would you first go to? Gives insight into who you think close friends are),
documents (shipping reports from East India Company to reconstruct network ties between ship captain
medical records – if you have a health emergency who should we contact)
Embeddedness (2)
fact that no one in society is free-floating, everyone is embedded in a network
could be heavily/lightly embedded depending on how many ties you have in that specific network
Embededness example
you might be a religious person, but are embedded in a network of a church; descriptor for when people are in a network