Final Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Domestic Corp

A

corporation forms in a state and operates business in that same state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Foreign Corp

A

Forms in one state and operates in another state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Alien Corp

A

Forms in one state and operates in another county (planet)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Scienter

A

guilty mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unilateral Mistake

A

when only one party is mistaken about a material fact in a contract (believing a fake painting is real)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Respondeat Superior

A

Employers are legally responsible for the actions of their employees within the scope of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Parol Evidence Rule

A

prevents parties from using oral evidence that goes against the written contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prenuptial Rule

A

Legal agreement made before marriage as to how property will be divided if they get divorced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Statute of Frauds

A

certain contracts must be in writing to be enforced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Undue Influence

A

someone uses power against you to convince you to do something like signing a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Liquidated Damages

A

contractually agreed upon amount of money that one party must pay if they breach the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nominal Damages

A

court awards a minimum of one dollar in damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

One year rule

A

if a contract cannot be completed within one year, it must be in writing to be enforced under Statute of Frauds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mitigation of Damages

A

requires that an injured party takes reasonable steps to reduce the damages caused by the other party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Specific Performance

A

court order requiring a party to fulfill the terms of the contract, typically used for unique or rare items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Duress

A

threats used to force someone into a contract

17
Q

Reformation

A

allows the court to rewrite a contract to reflect the parties true intentions, usually when the terms are unfair or mistaken

18
Q

Trade Secret

A

confidential business information that gives a competitive edge like coca cola recipe

19
Q

DBA

A

doing business as

20
Q

Fraud and Elements to Prove

A
  1. False representation of material fact
  2. Intent to deceive
  3. The innocent party relied on the misinformation
  4. The party suffered financial or physical injury as a result
21
Q

Types of contracts under Statute of Fraud

A
  1. Real Estate Contracts
  2. Brokers Commissions
  3. Sale of goods over $500
  4. If you guarantee something
22
Q

Promissory Estoppel

A
  1. A clear promise is made
  2. The promisee relies on the promise
  3. The reliance causes the promisee to suffer a detriment
  4. It would be unjust not to keep the promise
23
Q

Partnership key rights

A
  1. Right to participate in management
  2. Right to share in profits and losses
  3. The right to access information and books
  4. The right to repayment of loans made to the partnership
24
Q

Franchise

A
  1. Distributorship: car dealerships
  2. Chain-Style: Dunkin
  3. Processing Plant: bottling companies
25
Coming and Going Rule
Employees cannot receive workers compensation for injuries that occur while commuting to or from work, as those are not in the scope of employment.
26
Martin V. McDonalds
Issue: Is McDonalds liable for negligence? Decision: The court held that McDonalds was negligent for not following up to make sure the security issues were not corrected. If they checked up in security, the gunman would not be able to enter and harm the employees, holding them liable for the safety of their employees
27
Keating V. Goldlick
Issue: Was Goldlick’s negligent conduct committed within the scope of his employment for Lapp Roofing? Decision: The court held that Goldlick was not acting within the course and scope of his employment when his negligent conduct occurred. The job did not pay him to drive the company vehicle while drunk. The court granted judgment to Lapp Roofing on this issue.