Final Flashcards
Canter
- Teachers must be assertive
- State rules consistently and clearly
- Follow through appropriately
- Apply positive/negative consequences
Kohn Vs Canter
Carter: Assertive Discipline
- Rewards/consequences (reward/coersion)
- Assertive, passive or hostile
- Works for intrinsic motivation
- One control figure and students given chance to make informed choices
- Teacher has legitimate power
- Set up rules and discipline plan
Kohn: Assertive Discipline
- student directed learning
- No rewards/punishments
- democracy (active student learning)
- classroom discussions/meetings
- lessons are made around student’s interests
Canter’s Three Styles
Non Assertive: no follow through…fail to establish clear standards of behaviour, fail to follow through on threats
Hostile style: shout, use threats and sarcasm, potential for emotional harm
Assertive style: Teacher clearly and spcifically places limits and rewards or consequences without permission
Behaviour Interventions
- self-control
- do not cause more disruption to teaching and learning
- lessons probability of further disruption
- protects students from physical and psych harm
- maximize alternative left for the teacher
Planned Ignoring (Initial step)
- Intentionally ignore undesirable behaviours
Signal Interference (Initial step)
- Non-verbal
- Body language
- No smiling when making eye contact
Proximity Interference (Initial step)
- Any movement towards the disruptive student
- walk towards and stay in close proximity
Verbal Intervention (second tier)
- When non-verbal has failed
- used properly, makes job easier
- done wrong, makes job difficult
- be private
- be brief
- speak to situation, not student
- after two failed verbal interventions, more on to logical consequences stage of management hierarchy
- use adjacent reinforcement, calling on student by name and using humor
- Use open ended questions, not closed ended.
Use verbal interventions to:
Create self-awareness in student
Requests and demands:
“I message” Three parts:
- description of behaviour
- description of effect of beh on students and teacher
- teacher’s feeling about effects of misbehaviour
- best used with referent power base
Direct Appeal
please stop calling out answeres so that everyone will have a chance to answer (firm voice)
*referent and expert power base
Positive Phrasing
- works well for internalizing good behaviour, positive behaviour leads to positive rewards.
ARE NOT FOR
Pencils ARE NOT FOR… *works best for the little guyts
Reminding students of the rules
- Legitimate and reward/coercive
- after you draw attention to the rule and the student still does not abide, you MUST deliver a consequence
*John, please tell me what the rule is for answering a question?
Glasser’s Triplets
- What are you doing?
- Is it against the rules?
- What should you be doing?
Or, turn questions into statements:
- You are calling out, it is against the rules, you should raise your hand if you want to answer.
* caution with how you approach child, tone of voice and body langauge
Explicit Redirection
- Teacher taking responsibility for behaviour
- This is an order to get back on task!
…if child says no, you end up in confrontational mode. Not good!
Canter’s Broken Record Strategy
- Three repeats and move onto stronger measures
…get back to work, get back to work, get back to work.
- If child argues: “that’s not the point”
Logical Consequences
When none of the above is effective, it’s time to move onto logical consequences…
- you spilled the paint, you clean it up
- you came 5 mins late, you give me give mins of your time
“You have a choice”
“You may stop calling out answers, or go sit in the back of the room”
“You have a choice: You may either stopp calling out answers or go sit in the hal utnil I have a chance to talk with you.
- BUT BE AWARE OF PIAGET’S LEVEL OF COG DEV. KEEP IN MIND WHAT THE STUDENT IS ABLE TO DO WELL AT THAT DEV AGE BEFORE DELIVERING A CONSEQUENCE - therefore, talk them through their choice. They may not be aware of the inconsistencies of their own reasoning (lack of metacognition)
- Do the talking privately so it doesn’t turn into a different issue completely.
- If this doesnt work, apply a consequence. Remain calm, firm and assertive.
Structuring the Environment
- Teacher behaviours that encourage students to follow classroom guidelines
- How to help students learn responsibility
- The relationship between the culture of school and home/community
Misbehaviour:
- does not happen by chance
TWO CRUCIAL VARIABLES:
- physical environment and classroom guidelines
- classroom are not culturally neutral: it’s important to consider how well the culture of the classroom is congruent with the diverse needs of the students
- Teachers need to be aware and motiro their own behaviour and reactions to student behaviour
- Student’s rights and responsibilities are also important (canadian charter of rights and freedoms)
Environmental conditions:
- important to do as much as possible to create enviornmental conditions conducive to learning: heat, lighting, noise, use of space, seating arrangments, bulletin boards, display areas, technology (maslow’s heirarchy of needs)
Classroom guidelines:
- should outline clear expectations and well-defined standards
- ^ to help give students a feeling of safety, security and direction
- is an antecedent variable the teacher has control over
Classroom Routines
Routines and Rules:
- Routines are taught to students through examples and demonstrations
- Properly designed and learned, routines maximize on-task student behaviour by minimizing the need for students to ask for directions.