Final Flashcards

(76 cards)

1
Q

What is research?

A

• A systematic process that answers a question and is free from bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the research process

A
  • Identify research problem
  • Specify research process
  • Collect data, analyze & interpret data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a theory?

A

•Unified set of ideas that might explain a question(developed through research)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inductive vs. Deductive Theory

A
  • Inductive- starts with individual cases, the purpose is to develop overarching theories,(take individual cases build up to theory)
  • Deductive- starts with overarching theories, purpose is to test overarching theories, (start with theory then test it)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are variables?

A

logical set of attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Independent vs. Dependent Variables

A
  • Independent= cause (what you change)

* Dependent= effect (depends on what you change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a Paradigm and why is it important in research?

A

•Framework for how you see the world- it influences what research questions are asked, what results you expect to find, how you collect data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Positivist Paradigm

A

•You believe one truth exists and it can be found using scientific methods (also known as realist)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Post-Positivist Paradigm

A

•There is one truth and it can only be known imperfectly (also realist) *most scientists are this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Constructivist Paradigm

A

•There are multiple truths and each person has own version of reality (therefore own version of truth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Constructionist Paradigm

A

•Multiple truths w/ own version of reality and everyone’s truth is shaped by social structure (feminist paradigms, race theory) (these ppl. Are critical theorists- knowledge is not value free, critical of truth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 purposes of reseach

A
  • Explanation- why?
  • Description- What, where, when, how (usually qualitative)
  • Exploration- learn more about subject, to test feasibility of more extensive study, to develop new methods of collecting and analyzing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nomothetic

A

•An attempt to identify casual factors of universal “laws”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Correlation vs. Causation

A
  • Correlation- empirical relationship between two variables

* Causation- making/causing something to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 parameters for causation

A

correlation, time order, non-spurious (not coincidental)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unit of analysis

A

what or whom is being studied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

sampling frame

A

•Representation of the pop. you are studying (requires you to consider criteria for who will be included in your study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Quantitative Research

A

•The numerical representation and manipulation of observed and recorded data describing and explaining phenomena that these observations/data reflect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Pros and Cons of quant. research

A

pros: easy to analyze/summarize
con: can only tell us what happened through numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Quant. Methodologies

A
  • Mode- most frequently occurring data point in set
  • Mean- statistical average (add all data points together and divide by number of data points in each set)
  • Medium- middle data point in rank order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Qualitative Research

A

• Collection of empirical materials that describe routine and problematic moments and meanings in individual lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pros and Cons of qual. research

A

pros: provides meaning and detail, offers place to start when researchers don’t know what to ask, flexible, cheap
cons: can be interpreted diff. ways, might be superficial (people talking/interacting), data can’t be applied wider

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Qual. Methodologies

A

• Mixed Methods- using more than one method to answer question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

mixed methods pros and cons

A

pros: address questions at different levels, develop new theories or data collection instrument, overcome weakness of single methodology,
con: takes time, discrepancies in data = challenges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Sequential vs. Concurrent
i. Sequential- quant then qual (qual results assist in explaining the findings of a quant study) ii. Concurrent- two or more methods used to confirm and cross-validate findings (collected at the same time, to strengthen study)
26
Likert Scale Survey Questions
5-7 point scale used to allow individual to rate their attitude about a particular statement (neutral option, equality of scale)
27
Double Barreled Survey Question
• Asking for a single response to a question that has multiple parts
28
Contingency Questions
• Question intended for only some respondents (determined by response to other questions)(relevant, shorter=better, avoid negative items, avoid bias terms)
29
Survey question order
* Can influence how respondents answer questions * Random order = chaotic * Most interesting question first- initial question should be non-threatening * Dull questions at end
30
Benefits of Pretesting your Survey
• To get out kinks of spelling, wording, question order, clarity of directions
31
Best practices when conducting surveys
• Be familiar with questionnaire, should be similar to pop being studied, follow question wording exactly, record responses exactly *ask probing questions
32
3 Components of ‘No harm to Participants’
* Respect for person- duty to protect sensitive/vulnerable pops. (Children, prisoners, intoxicated ppl.) * Beneficence- research should benefit pop. being studied, benefit should be equal to suffering * Justice- burdens & benefits of research should be shared fairly w/in society
33
Informed Concent
• Norm in which subjects base their voluntary participation in research projects based on a full understanding of the possible risks involved
34
Anonymity
• Guaranteed in a research project when participants can’t be identified by either the researchers or anyone else analyzing the data collected
35
Confidentiality
• Researchers identify a given person’s responses but promises not to do so publicly
36
Deception
• The act of making someone believe something that is not true
37
Debriefing
• Way of counter deception- interviewing subjects to learn about their experience of participation in the project & to inform them of any unrevealed
38
What are the obligations of Analysis & Reporting?
• Obligation to: Research subjects & scientific community
39
What is IRB? What is its role?
• Institutional Review Board- enforce ethical practices and procedures in research especially with human subjects
40
Population vs. Study Population
* Pop: the group we are interested in generalizing about | * Study Pop: the pop from which the sample is actually selected
41
Representativeness
* The quality of the sample in representing the pop you want o generalize about * The data derived from the sample should be assumed to represent the pop * Enhanced by probability sampling
42
Probability Sampling
• The general term for samples selected in accordance with probability theory (random sampling)
43
Random Sampling
each element has equal chance of selection
44
Simple Random Sample
units composing a pop are assigned numbers, set of random numbers are generated and units have those numbers are included in sample
45
Systematic Sampling
every #th unit is selected
46
Cluster Sampling
natural clusters are sampled initially, with members of each selected group being sub-sampled afterward
47
Stratification
• The grouping of units composing a pop into groups before sampling (can be used in conjunction with other sampling methods to improve representativeness)
48
Non-probability Sampling
• Any techniques in which samples are selected in some way not suggested by probability theory
49
4 types of non-probability sampling
o Purposeful- units included are selected on bases of researcher’s judgement about which ones will be most useful o Snowball- each person interviewed may be asked to suggest additional ppl. for interviewing (field research) o Stratification o Quota- units selected into sample on pre-specified characteristics so total sample will have same distribution of characteristics assumed to exist in pop.
50
sampling bias
• Sampling approach in which some members of the study pop are less likely to be studied than others
51
Validity
how accurately the study/data reflects the concept it is intended to measure
52
4 types of validity
a. Face Validity- Does the study seem like a reasonable measurement of the variable? (someone unfamiliar with research so it doesn’t make sense to them) b. Criterion Validity- When conclusion drawn from data set can be compared to criterion data collected later c. Content Validity-The degree to which a measure covers the range of meanings included within a concept d. Construct Validity-Degree to which a measure relates to other variables as expected within a system of theoretical relationships
53
Reliability
• Quality of measurement methods that suggest the same data would have been collected each time in repeated observations of the same phenomenon
54
Ways to improve Validity
* Triangulation * Member checking * Inter-coder agreement * Memoing (notes to self throughout study) * Time sampling
55
Ways to improve Reliability
* Memoing * Triangulation * Inter-coder reliability
56
Coding
identifying important info
57
Qualitative Data Analysis Steps (3 steps)
* Identify important info (coding) * Categorize info (developing themes) * Recognize Themes (conceptualizing: thoughts become more abstract/big picture, thinking about data as a whole)
58
Direction of Qualitative Data Analysis based on Inductive vs. Deductive Research
* Inductive: individual cases to larger theories | * Deductive: testing theories by looking at individual cases
59
Descriptive coding
• Little interpretation to store things known about the data item
60
Analytic coding
combining concepts to develop themes
61
Axial Coding
• developing themes, relating codes to each other
62
Increasing Validity & Reliability in Qualitative Data Analysis
replication of study
63
Univariate Analysis
• Analysis of a single variable for descriptive
64
Standard Deviation
• the amount of variability in a data set
65
Discrete Variable
• Variables whose attributes are separate from one another (gender, race, religion)
66
Continuous Variable
• Variable whose attributes form a steady progression (age, income)
67
Bivariate Analysis
• Analysis of two variables at once
68
Multi-variate analysis
• Analysis of multiple variables at one time
69
Standard Error
• Measure of the statistical accuracy of an estimate, the measure of uncertainty (large sample = small error, smaller sample = larger error)
70
Sampling Error
• An assumption that the data collected in perfect (error caused by observing a sample and not the entire pop. being studied)
71
Null Hypothesis
• Prediction that the two groups we are comparing are not significantly different from one another
72
Alternative Hypothesis
• Proposes there is a diff. between two variable being tested
73
Type I Error
• When we reject the null hypothesis even though it is true
74
Type II Error
• We do not reject null hypothesis, even though it is false
75
T-Test
• Analyze two means, comparison of two samples drawn independent of one another
76
P-Values & meaning of being less than .05 or greater than .05
* An obtained significance level * Less: null hypothesis is rejected (there is real diff. in variables) * Greater: the null hypothesis is retained (no diff. in variables)