Final Exam Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

Know the two realms of knowledge that helped us think through the objective/subjective tension in theology.

A

The two realms are phenomena (sense experience—appearances) and noumena (beyond senses—thing in itself). Phenomena knowledge is accessible by human reason, noumena is not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the practical implications for biblical clarity?

A

1) A clear Bible still needs interpretation, but its meaning is accessible by anyone with sufficient time and knowledge of the Scriptures. 2) Scripture can still be misunderstood due to our own faults. 3) There is hope. 4) The pastor/staff of a church are not the only ones who interpret.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the practical implications for biblical sufficiency?

A

1) God’s word to us should be sought in Scripture. 2) Be encouraged as you try to discover what God would have us to think or do. 3) Scripture is not to be added to and no other writings are of equal value. 4) God does not require us to believe anything about himself or his redemptive work that is not found in Scripture. 5) Scripture has what we need to know for instruction in godliness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does biblical authority mean?

A

All the words of Scripture are God’s words in such a way that to disbelieve or disobey any word of Scripture is to disbelieve or disobey God—Grudem, Systematic Theology, 73.
The Reformers’ conviction of sola scriptura is the conviction that Scripture is the only infallible authority, the only supreme authority. Yet it is not the only authority, for the creeds and the church’s teaching function as important subordinate authorities, under the authority of Scripture (Ward, Words of Life, 147).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do we need theology?

A

To meet human needs – refute heresies and bad teaching, help answer and avoid theological problems, catechize and disciple people, preach and teach the Scriptures comprehensively and better understand Scripture.
Progressive revelation leads to it.
It teaches the truth of God’s word in the contemporary context; it shows us how to apply God’s word to every aspect of our lives.
It helps people understand and apply Scripture correctly.
Scripture does theology (Acts 17, cf. 7)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Address the sufficiency of general revelation.

A

General revelation is sufficient in its disclosure of God to hold people accountable for their rejection of God, but it is not sufficient to show them how to be forgiven. (When we reject the testimony of general revelation we sin against the one revealed. Knowledge is available but limited and at times mingled with error and uncertainty. There is a need for the Gospel, witness, evangelists, etc. God provided a special revelation to help us understand and interpret natural revelation.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three major types of knowledge that theology accounts for in its formulation?

A

Normative, situational, and existential. (Biblical theology, worldview-formative & corrective, worship & transformation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Paul’s theology in Acts 17.

A

Paul’s theology was apparent in his telling of the story of redemption. He uses doctrines of God, man, and Christ. He introduces his audience to God (24-28), saying God is the creator, sustainer, sovereign Lord, and revealer. Then he gives the doctrine of man (29-30), saying humans are God’s creatures, but they are sinners. Next he introduces Christ (18; 30,31), saying he is the judge of the world and the resurrected one. Finally he makes application—response is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the three paradigms for coming to revealed truth.

A

1) Fideism—one cannot know the truth rightly because they do not have the Spirit (Barth); can’t know until they have faith (Yes to spiritual blindness but does not address moral antipathy).
2) Rationalism—anyone can understand and cognitively know truth, the problem is moral; we will always reject truth and not submit unless there is a work of the Spirit (Yes to moral antipathy but no to spiritual blindness).
3) Critical realism—we can see and understand the world and are responsible for what we see and handle, but we cannot see the truth as truth without the illumination of the Spirit (both moral antipathy and spiritual blindness accounted for).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Be familiar with the Theology from Above and Theology from Below distinctions.

A

From Above: Sees theology as an objective science. Emphasizes the scientific method and cognitive understanding.
From Below: Sees theology as subjective experience. Emphasizes expression of our longings and desires, and analyzes the “religious consciousness.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does concurrence mean?

A

In relation to the inspiration of Scripture concurrence means that both God and the human author were speaking at the same time (concurrently). (God’s sovereignty and human agency are not at odds in the process but are working concurrently/compatibly to bring forth the very word of God.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of inspiration.

A

Inspiration is the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit upon the human authors of Scripture such that their writings were precisely what God intended them to write in order to communicate his truth, and as such, they are completely trustworthy and authoritative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of inerrancy.

A

A natural consequence of inspiration and God being wholly truthful and without error. “When all the facts are known, the Bible in the original autographs and properly interpreted will be shown to be wholly true and never false in all that it affirms, whether that has to do with doctrine, ethics, the physical, social or life sciences” (cf. Paul Feinberg, “The Meaning of Inerrancy” in Inerrancy, ed. Norman Geisler, 267-304).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of illumination.

A

The work of the Holy Spirit by which he makes the Scriptures understandable and applicable to the believer’s life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of canonicity.

A

The list of books that the Church recognizes as inspired and becomes the rule by which we measure (evaluate) our lives; the books which are God’s inspired Word – the closed collection of documents that constitute authoritative Scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of sufficiency.

A

The Sufficiency of Scripture means that Scripture contains all the words God intended his people to have at each stage of redemptive history and that it now contains all the words of God we need for salvation, trusting him perfectly, and for obeying him perfectly.

17
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of clarity.

A

The Clarity of Scripture means that the Bible is written in such a way that its teachings are able to be understood by all who will read it seeking God’s help and being willing to follow it.

18
Q

Define and be able to identify aspects of authority.

A

All the words of Scripture are God’s words in such a way that to disbelieve or disobey any word of Scripture is to disbelieve or disobey God (Grudem). Authority of Scripture is the authority of God as he reveals himself through Scripture—authority is based in the source.

19
Q

Why is the canon closed?

A

Jesus is the final revelation; it all points to him. Jesus commissioned the Apostles to convey revelation with a unique authority that is no longer around.

20
Q

Be able to define theology as it was discussed in class.

A

Theology is the understanding and application of the entire counsel of God as communicated in all the Christian Scriptures to all areas of life and contemporary culture for the purpose of true worship and transformation.

21
Q

What are the different types of inerrancy? What distinguishes them? Which one do you hold to and why?

A

1) Technical—accuracy of contemporary science and history are over the Bible, though it can still be shown to be accurate.
2) Limited (Kerygmatic)—details can and will be off due to human error, but overall the main point is clear and true (i.e. infallibility).
3) Full—everything that the Bible teaches or claims to be true we accept as true.

22
Q

Explain the issue of the circular argument for biblical authority.

A

Using Scripture to prove that Scripture is God’s Word is a circular argument (we believe that the Bible is the Word of God because it says it is the Word of God).
All arguments for absolute authority must appeal to itself (that authority) for proof—otherwise that authority would not be the highest authority (Grudem).
Increasing knowledge of Scripture and increasing correction of our understanding of God and this world tend to supplement each other in some way each demonstrating the correctness of the other.

23
Q

What does general revelation have to do with the Christian life?

A

GR serves as a support to the believer, a source of worship, and an aid to apologetics and evangelism.

(GR can be a starting point for evangelism; it is a stabilizer for human society; it provides a prelude for God’s redemptive work; it makes the real world count; it makes us marvel at God’s further grace and mercy in SR; it renders all humans guilty.)

24
Q

Why does redemptive religion need revelation?

A

Religion is distinct from other sciences, arts, and ethics because its interest is not first and foremost fellow man, but the supernatural—that which is transcendent, external, invisible, however that power is conceived (there is no religion without a god).
If there is a god then it must relate in some form of knowledge to its worshippers–in the mind, personal expression, on paper, etc.
Religion asks, “what must I do to be saved?” and revelation is needed for that to be answered.

25
What is natural theology? Is it possible?
Natural theology: the attempt to attain an understanding of God and his relationship with the universe by means of rational reflection, without appealing to special revelation. Due to man’s falleness, people are unable to accurately and reliable do theology by reason alone. Humans need the spectacles that the Bible and the regenerating work of the Spirit provide in order to see what is there. There is general (natural) revelation, but there is no natural theology.
26
What is neo-orthodoxy’s position (Barth) on Christian Scripture? What are the two main components of their argument?
Instead of affirming a direct identity between the human words of Scripture and the Word of God, it insists on an indirect relationship. There are two components to this view: 1) Scripture is a witness to the Word of God. 2) Scripture not only witnesses to the Word of God, it may also become it (if the Spirit graciously decides to appropriate the words for the purpose of self-revelation). This undermines the authority of Scripture.
27
What is verbal-plenary inspiration? Why does it matter?
All (=plenary) of Scripture is inspired of God, right down to the very words of the text (=verbal). There is an identity between the human words of Scripture and the Word of God. This is important because it means that we can trust that Scripture is accurate and true; it means that Scripture is authoritative, infallible, and inerrant.
28
Know the difference between general and special revelation.
GR is the knowledge of God’s being and will unveiled by Him to all people everywhere, at all times, through the ordinary experience of being alive in God’s world. SR is God making himself known through the imparting of truth by particular acts and words, especially in the Word of the Lord (Scripture) and the Lord of the Word (Jesus Christ).
29
Know the scope and substance of both general and special revelation.
GR is general in scope. It includes the whole world; it is natural in mode and location; it is general and universal as opposed to special and particular (non-salvific in content). GR is general in substance. It cannot have all the specifics, (but it tells us that God exists, he is good and just, he is one, creator, eternal and independent, invisible and powerful, personal and wise, distinct from though active in the universe, sustainer, worthy of worship). SR is special in scope. It is not to all people (specific and particular). SR is special in substance. It gives the specifics regarding redemption; it is redemptive and salvific.
30
Know the modes/avenues of general and special revelation.
GR modes: creation and conscience. SR modes: personal encounter (audible voice, dreams and visions, etc.), mighty acts, propositional revelation (including but not exclusively Scripture), incarnation.
31
Know the history of the inerrancy debate and where/why they divide over terminology.
There are two drastically different views on the nature of the Bible: 1) It is a divine book and its words are inspired and true (“inerrant”), 2) It is a humanly flawed book and is only inspired in concepts (Stephen Davis: “infallible”). The new critique from ‘left-wing evangelicals’ is that inerrancy is logically inadequate since many statements in Scripture are not propositional in nature and does not cover non-propositional speech acts. In defense of the traditional view, inerrancy simply is to believe that no errant assertion occurs in Scripture (due to its source). The content of this doctrine was not derived from a reaction to Enlightenment, though its form may have been influenced by it.
32
Theology in Practice: How do we do theology? What is Scripture’s relationship to theology?
Scripture is the first order as it is normative, authoritative, divine revelation. Theology is the second order as it seeks to conceptualize, re-proclaim, and apply Scripture. There are four horizons of theology: 1) textual: genre; exegesis; meaning of passage. 2) epochal: progressive revelation. 3) canonical: unity amidst diversity. 4) theological: how the other horizons feed our current horizon. Theology is done with faith, reason, Christian character, Christian disciplines, and in community.
33
What elements are necessary for religious revelation to take place?
The existence of a personal divine being who originates the announcement. A truth, fact, or event that up until the time of its announcement was not yet known. A human being to whom the announcement was made.
34
Think through the creator-creature distinction.
Creator-creature distinction is the central issue for Christian God talk. The creator-creature distinction tells us that God is transcendent (ontologically and morally), man is finite and fallen (ontologically and morally distinct from God), and reconciliation of the transcendent God and finite-fallen man is only through a work of divine redemption.
35
What was Friedrich Schleiermacher’s take on theology?
In an attempt to “save” Christianity from the enlightenment and in response to Kant’s two realms of knowledge that made God unknowable, Schleiermacher claimed “feeling” was the foundation of theology. Theology becomes the attempt to set forth the feeling of total dependence on God in speech (replaces objective dogmatic statements about God).
36
Based on our discussion of God’s self-disclosure, are there limits to our knowledge of God? If so, what are they? Why are they there?
Yes. Since God is infinite and transcendent and we are finite creatures, we cannot know God exhaustively, but we can know God truly (in an objective sense). We cannot know God in full, but we can know God in what he has revealed about himself. God is incomprehensible (not unintelligible, but rather unfathomable) in that his thoughts and ways are beyond us. There is a quantitative and qualitative difference between creator and creature. This did not result from the fall, but is due to our finite nature.
37
What are the criteria for canonicity?
Written by a recognized prophet, apostle, or associate of one. Consistent and truthful. Faithfulness to previously accepted canonical writings (conformity to the rule of faith). Confirmed by Christ, prophet, and/or apostle—apostolic awareness of new authoritative Scripture being written. Church usage and recognition.