final exam Flashcards

(124 cards)

1
Q

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

MRI

A

energy at specific radio frequencies is absorbed and reemitted by nuclei with non-zero spin
(electromagnetic energy but same concept as resonance)
w=yB
w=resonant (Larmor) frequency -> 85mHz typ.
y=gyromagnetic ratio
B=magnetic field strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MRI signal

A

radio frequency pulse (at Larmor frequency to be absorbed by hydrogen in brain) goes into brain
excites atoms in brain and then energy is released

measures density of hydrogen atoms but pulse of certain freq. only absorbed by H atoms, measure how much is absorbed then released again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gradients to encode space

A
  • parts of brain have slightly different magnetic field strengths s
  • resonance frequency for hydrogen will be different due to magnetic field

Encodes energy using frequency and phase (3 gradients to get separate measurements to create 3D image)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

K space

A

represents density of hydrogen but changes timing to measure other things
records how much energy comes out of brain in each point in time during recording

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

convert k-space to real space

A

2D Fourier transformation (mathematical)
information needs to be decoded
different parts of brain represented by different frequencies and phases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast

A

key to fMRI
oxygenation of blood gives hint of how active areas of brain are
- cells require energy source when metabolically active so they use up oxygen and other resources provided by blood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Oxygenated hemoglobin

A

diamagnetic
zero magnetic moment
–> has iron in it, one of the more magnetically active elements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Deoxygenated hemoglobin

A

paramagnetic
significant magnetic moment
greater magnetic susceptibility
- causes faster T2 decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

timing from hemoglobin

A

spike of oxygenated blood rushes in to sweep away deoxygenated hemoglobin
(deoxygenated from active use)
this dip in deoxygenated blood (from replacement) takes about 6s and the response is much more spread out in time
*fMRI does not have very good temporal resolution (cannot see direct neural activity but slower smeared out response for circulatory system)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

fMRI data

A

subjects –> run (sequence on trials and tasks) –> volume (allows to measure where changes happen) –> slices –> voxel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

fMRI signal/data

A

in order to collect frames every 2 seconds, resolution is sacrificed
images are a lot blurrier for fMRI for quick image collection
doesn’t affect too much cause changes are what are being recorded (local areas serviced by certain blood vessels)
BOLD signal is really weak, most of signal is structure but BOLD changes sit on top of main structural signal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

fMRI data preprocessing

A

1) slice timing correction
2) realignment
3) coregistration
4) normalization
5) smoothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Slice timing correction

A

data collected slice by slice and it takes time to collect each slice so the time you collected data at the bottom is different from the top
takes 2 seconds to do whole brain
**data has to be interpolated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Realignment

A

cant assume a voxel equals same bit of brain across time (think small movements, few mms make a difference)
typical
- tries to correct for translations and rotations of the brain
uses 6 parameter rigid body transformation (3 translations 3 rotations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reslicing

A

after realignment, need to replace to match up voxels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Coregistration

A

align function images to structural image
- uses an affine transformation (translation, rotation, scale, shear)
collects functional and also clear structural images but using different techniques to make them comparable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Normalisation

A

warp each subject’s brain into a standard space using deformations by linear combination of smooth basis functions
- every brain is a snowflake but there is a standard brain other images are matched up with
segments into grey matter, white matter and CSF using tissue probability maps and Bayesian estimation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Smoothing

A

deals with remaining inconsistencies by smoothing/blurring images

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Blocked design

A

trials are grouped into blocks
hemodynamic response is estimated per block
e.g. testing reactions to faces, first test response to fearful faces, then happy, then neutral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Event-related design

A

mix different trial types together and show them in random sequence
uses jittering between conditions
neural activity to each one of the trials will highly overlap with response to other trials (try to control for with jittering)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Mixed design

A

blocks of separated conditions within which there are separated temporally jittered events of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Mass-univariate general linear model (GLM) analysis

A

univariate analysis of each voxel but for every voxel

  • data collected from each voxel in brain over time
  • predicted time course for activity related to each event/condition of interest (try to explain data in terms of what’s going on in the experiment)
  • look at what was recorded in brain for each voxel and look at pattern of activity for what voxels respond to
  • estimates are made for how much each event contributes to signal in each voxel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Familywise error rate (FWE)

correction for multiple comparisons

A

family-wise error correction gets rid of false positives but also gets rid of most of the signal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

False discovery rate (FDR)

correction for multiple comparisons

A

still has a pretty good job of detecting signal and getting rid of false positives (compromise)
e.g. 5% of active voxels are false positives instead of each test being 5% wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Long term memory (LTM)
processes by which information is encoded, stored and retrieved - encoded within connections between neurons, affected by how many connections, frequency, neurotransmitters, etc. - massive timescale (minutes, hours, days, years) - massive capacity (words, faces, events, skills, etc.) - common underlying representation (# and strength of synaptic connections)
26
Types of LTM
semantic episodic procedural
27
LTM processes
1) encoding 2) consolidation 3) storage 4) retrieval 5) ~~ reconsolidation?
28
Encoding LTM
initial creation of memory traces in brain from incoming information
29
Consolidation LTM
continued organization and stabilization of memory traces over time
30
Storage LTM
retention of memory traces over time
31
Retrieval LTM
accessing/using stored information from memory traces
32
Reconsolidation LTM
possible reorganization and re-stabilization of memory traces after retrieval
33
Episodic memory
events specific personal experiences from a particular time and place - medial temporal love, middle diencephalon, neocortex subset of declarative/explicit memory (LTM)
34
Semantic memory
``` facts world knowledge object knowledge language knowledge conceptual priming middle temporal lobe, middle diencephalon, neocortex ``` subset of declarative/explicit memory (LTM)
35
Procedural memory
skills (motor and cognitive) basal ganglia skeletal muscle subset of non declarative (implicit) memory
36
Recognition memory paradigm
Study phase presents words, images, pairs, etc. Delay is active or passive test phase presents test items and response = "old" or "new" item sometimes asks for confidence, "remember vs. know" etc.
37
Recollection (remember)
conscious memory for seeing the item during study phase
38
familiarity (know)
intuitive feeling of having recently encountered the item
39
DRM paradigm
Deese, Roediger, McDermott present list of semantically related words recognition memory test - words on list - unrelated distractors - semantically-related distractors (lures) lures are not on the list but similar in meaning which are the ones we incorrectly remember as being on the list
40
DRM paradigm | false memories for lures
lures affirmed almost as often as words actually on the list high confidence in accuracy if assessed high level of "remembering" happens even if informed about effect
41
Implications from DRM
memory is not replayed like a video but reconstructed based on multiple pieces of information - what actually happened - one's knowledge, experience and expectations *false memories are possible, likely and vivid in right circumstances
42
Cabeza et al. 2001 study
18 thematic and categorical 14 word lists thematic: water, ice, dark, wet, freeze categorial: cucumber, pea, potato, onion, corn words presented every 2s with interval of several seconds between lists participants instructed to remember words and who presented them
43
Cabeza et al. 2001 study | task/test phase
Recognition tested - each word presented for 3s - old vs. new judgment with button press - 9.5 second pause before next trial (SLOW EVENT RELATED DESIGN) -for each list: 1 old, 1 lure (often answered as old but should be new), 1 unrelated word 6 blocks of 6 lists each --> 36 old words, 36 lures, 36 unrelated new words Asked whether female or male presented the word
44
Cabeza | Bilateral (anterior) hippocampal regions
activation for lures is almost the same as activation for true words the brain gets fooled by lures
45
Cabeza study | Left posterior parahippocampal region
in this brain region, lures do not look like true memories but new items
46
Cabeza conclusions
Left posterior parahippocampal region - memory for sensory information (new items, thinking at a lower level and more sensory focused) Bilateral hippocampal regions - memory for semantic information = incorrectly thinking lures were on list True memories activate both false activate hippocampal but not parahippocampal new memories activated neither Lure items = no memory for sensory information but for semantic
47
Broca
1861 - patient w/ lesion of Inferior frontal gyrus - deficit of speech production - damage to Broca's area leads to Broca's aphasia
48
Wernicke
1874 - patients w/ damage to superior temporal gyrus - deficit of speech comprehension - damage to Wernicke's area leads to Wernicke's aphasia
49
Aims of cognitive neuroscience
1) identify processes that underlie normal condition 2) to localize these processes to particular neural structures/systems often uses brain damage and breakdown of function/behaviour
50
Lesion method
infer what mental process a brain area implements by observing what behavioural deficit a patient shows when that brain area is damaged
51
Localization of function/modularity
each mental process is carried out by a particular part of the brain
52
single case studies pros and cons
Pros: - one patient can be studied in great detail - allows the study of extremely rare conditions Cons: - the pattern observed for one individual may not be representative of people in general (e.g. can have an atypical brain)
53
group studies pros and cons
Pros: - avoids conclusions based on a single patient - more generalizable to the population at large Cons: - the group average may not reflect any particular patient - when it comes to brain damage, very particular so are you really studying multiple copies of the same thing or different brain damage
54
Sources of brain damage
1) deprivation of oxygen and nutrients 2) damage mechanically (through or on skull) 3) subarachnoid hemorrhage (Leakage of blood from circ. system into brain)
55
Deprivation of oxygen and nutrients
Ischemia: blood flow is cut off or restricted/tissues become oxygen and nutrient deprived (e.g. glucose) - deprivation +10 minutes = cell death - areas of dead tissue = lesion or infarct
56
mechanical damage
- blow to head or penetrating object (direct damage) - increase intracranial pressure (squashes cells) - surgical removal of brain tissue
57
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
rupture of cerebral artery - can lead to ischemia - can result in subdural hematoma (blood clot on surface of brain which increase intracranial pressure) - blood can block drainage of CSF from the ventricles (increased intracranial pressure)
58
Major causes of brain damage
- head injuries - cerebrovascular causes - brain tumours - neurotoxins - neurological diseases
59
Cerebral edema
Swelling - collection of fluid around damaged tissue - increased intracranial pressure (squashing)
60
Thromobosis
Thrombosis is the formation of a blood clot, known as a thrombus, within a blood vessel. It prevents blood from flowing normally through the circulatory system
61
Embolism
a blockage-causing piece of material formed, inside a blood vessel. Is formed elsewhere and moves through vessels and then gets blocked. The embolus may be a blood clot (thrombus), a fat globule (fat embolism), a bubble of air or other gas (gas embolism), or foreign material.
62
Arteriosclerosis
thickening and hardening of artery walls (which can lead to blockages)
63
Aneurysms
vascular dilations resulting from local defects in blood vessel elasticity
64
Stroke
cerebral vascular accident | - sudden appearance of neurological symptoms as a result of sever interruption of blood flow
65
Infarct
area of dead tissue resulting from an obstruction of blood vessels normally supplying the area (can be caused by a stroke)
66
Tumour
mass of new tissue that persists and grows independently of its surrounding structures and has no physiological use
67
Gliomas
arise from glial cells brain tumour typically an infiltrating tumour
68
Meningiomas
growths attached to the meninges | brain tumour
69
metastatic tumours
established by a transfer of tumour cells from elsewhere in the body
70
Neurotoxins
often result in diffuse brain damage some cause specific: Alcohol - mammillary bodies (Korsakoff's Amnesia) MPTP (heroin related) - substantiated migra (Drug-Induced Parkinsonism)
71
Single dissociation
Single: have 1 patient with some type of damage Dissociation: perfomance differs (dissociates) across two tasks
72
Double dissociation
Made of two single dissociations Double: two patients with some type of damage Dissociation: their performance differs (dissociates) across two tasks
73
Issues with lesion method
``` - preexisting patient variability (age, Education, intelligence) - variability of lesion (location, size, etiology, accidents of nature not controlled experiments --> measurement not manipulation) - poor temporal & spatial resolution (permanent so part of task affected cant be determined, cant turn lesion on or off, compensation & cant measure single neuron cause damage usually widespread) - compensatory strategies - fibres of passage could be damaged ```
74
Wernicke-Lichteim-Geschwind model
theory/model of how language is implemented in the brain | - primarily based on lesion studies of aphasia
75
Wernicke's area
language perception (speech sounds)
76
Arcuate fasciculus
fibre tract from wernicke's area to Broca's area
77
Broca's area
language production (speech actions)
78
Angular gyrus
converts written words to spoken words - when we read text, there's sort of an internal conversion and comprehension - links visual form to spoken form (internal dialogue)
79
Spoken language perception
- auditory sensory pathway - primary auditory cortex - Wernicke's area - Higher-level cortex
80
Written language perception
- visual sensory pathway - primary visual cortex - secondary visual cortex - angular gyrus - Wernicke's area - higher-level cortex
81
Spontaneous spoken language production
- higher level cortex - Wernicke's area - arcuate fascicles - Broca's area - primary motor cortex
82
Repetition of speech
- auditory sensory pathway - primary auditory cortex - Wernicke's area - Arcuate fascicles - Broca's area - Primary motor cortex
83
APHASIA
``` - impairment of language Tested using multiple communication modalities --> not simply input/output pathway, must affect core aspects of language and is somewhat independent of solely motor or sensory pathways - spoken language perception - spoken language production - written language perception - written language production ``` **often caused by stoke, typically left side of brain (where language area usually located)
84
Broca's aphasia
Expressive aphasia, motor aphasia *motor apparatus is fine but expression of words is difficult Spontaneous speech: slow, laboured, nonfluent - most difficult verbs, articles, pronouns - makes sense but ungrammatical - better fluency for memorized phrases, singing Repetition: slow, laboured, nonfluent Comprehension: relatively spared (aware of struggle/inability to articulate knowledge and aware of gap between what they want to say and what is being said Writing: shows same errors as speech (production problem) Impairment of grammar and hierarchy of language than production
85
Wernicke's aphasia
Receptive aphasia, sensory aphasia Spontaneous speech: fluent, unlabored, prosodic, but relatively meaningless (and unaware of errors) - words used inappropriately - nonsense words (neologisms) - roundabout expression of meaning (circumlocution) Repetition: fluent, unlabored but w/ neologisms Comprehension: severely impaired Writing: shows same errors as speech Impairment of comprehension rather than perception --> problem is linking speech sounds to meaning, not perceiving the words
86
Global aphasia
``` Spontaneous speech: severely impaired Repetition: severely impaired Comprehension: severely impaired Writing: severely impaired Associated with damage to both areas ```
87
Transcortical motor aphasia
Broca's aphasia with intact sentence repetition | turning sounds into speech without needing to know what its about, then those pathways still intact
88
Transcortical sensory aphasia
Wernicke's aphasia w/ intact sentence repetition
89
Mixed transcortical aphasia
global aphasia w/ intact sentence repetition
90
Conduction aphasia
Spontaneous speech: relatively intact - phonemic paraphasia--> (e.g. pants = splant, plants, plant, pants" or pretzel = trep, tretzle, trethle, tredfles) & conduit d'approche Repetition: severely impaired Comprehension: relatively intact Writing: relatively intact Associated with damage to ARCUATE FASCICULUS * disputed cause fibres of passage damaged or something else?
91
Anarthria/dysarthria
impaired speech production | - specific to speech and not local (control of vocal apparatus)
92
Auditory verbal agnosia/pure word deafness
impaired speech perception | can still hear in general but have a specific problem hearing and recognizing spoken words
93
Alexia/dyslexia
impaired reading | - visual comprehension
94
agraphia/dysgraphia
impaired writing
95
anomia/dysnomia
impaired naming | - not being able to name vs. difficulty naming but really just used interchangeably
96
Apraxia of speech
motor difficulties with formation of words due to brain damage Disorder in programming the speech musculature to produce correct sounds of words in the proper sequence with the appropriate timing - inconsistent articulatory errors - articulatory groping - disruption in prosody - disruption in rate of speech * *Not a perceptual problem - -> no difficulty perceiving or recognizing speech sounds, including their own articulatory errors
97
Localization of speech articulation planning
the pre-central gyrus of the left insulated is necessary for the preliminary planning and initiation of articulatory movements * because left hemisphere stroke and for most right handed people have language on the left - insula mediates motor aspects of speech production (articulatory control)
98
Goals of cognitive neuroscience
- determine how the brain mediates cognition and behaviour | - relate neural structures to mental functions and behavioural acts
99
Challenges of cog. neuro
``` brain is massively complex ~100 billion neurons ~100 trillion synapses The mind is not directly observable behaviour is noisy, inconsistent, individualized, diverse ```
100
Diffusor tensor imaging (DTI)
measuring fibre tracts between brain areas
101
Positron emission tomography (PET)
e.g. using radio tracers to track dopamine distribution in the brain
102
Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
imaging magnetic fields due to neural activity
103
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)
imaging hemodynamic response non-invasively
104
Brainbow
imaging of individual neurons using genetic manipulation and fluorescent proteins
105
optogenetics
genetic manipulation to allow use of light to switch neurons on and off
106
Independent epistemic support | Benefits of converging methods
converging results support each of the converging techniques since its unlikely that by chance two different techniques that make different assumptions would produce convergent results - redundancy - replication
107
Complementation | benefits of converging methods
"to obtain complementary information about the phenomenon under investigation" integrating results from multiple techniques can give a better understanding of the relationship between neural structures and cognitive operations - different perspectives - new insight
108
Decision making
selection of a brief or action (choice) among alternatives possibilities (options) Choice = make a response or withhold a response (can be selecting from multiple options or not making a selection) - requires integration and evaluation of multiple factors
109
Decisions under certainty
each option has a sure known outcome
110
Uncertainty
``` lacking knowledge about what outcome will follow from a decision 3 types: - under risk - under ambiguity - under ignorance ``` *most decisions in life are more focused on ignorance and ambiguity and are made under partial ignorance
111
Decision under risk
options are probabilistic, but all information (value and probability) is known
112
Decision making under ambiguity
options are probabilistic, and either values or probabilities of an option are unknown
113
Decision under ignorance
one of more options is unknown
114
Preferences (stated vs. revealed)
``` Stated = what they would prefer if given these options Revealed = what do they prefer when given those options ```
115
Normative/prescriptive model of decision making
- describes how people "should" decide (in order to maximize wealth) - grounded in economic and statistical theory ``` Expected value (option I with j possible outcomes) *people should make decisions based on expected values ```
116
Prospect theory
Descriptive model of choice - describes how people "do" decide - grounded in observed behaviour ~relative decisions are not absolute Key features: - objective values are transformed into subjective values (what would be the value or utility of outcome) - objective probabilities are transformed into subjective decision weights - options are evaluated based on a common reference point (e.g. what I have rn, what I want, need, etc.)
117
Aversive stimuli
options involved increased risk or punishment - insular cortex (INS) - ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC)
118
Unexpected rewards
outcomes are better than expected - ventral striatum (STR) - medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)
119
Executive control
Top-down processed required for evaluation of uncertain choice options - dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) - posterior parietal cortex (PPC)
120
Behavioural inhibition system | carver & white, 1994
- sensitive to signals of punishment, non reward, and novelty - inhibits behaviour that may lead to negative or painful outcomes - responsible for experience of negative feelings such as fear, anxiety, frustration and sadness
121
Behavioural approach/activation system (BAS)
- sensitive to signals of reward, non punishment and escape from punishment - causes person to begin (or to increase) movements towards goals - responsible for experience of positive feelings such as hope, elation and happiness
122
Stroop task model | Cohen, Dunbar & McClelland, 1990
neural network model - name ink colour or word - hard/slow: two competing responses Requires top-down cognitive control to inhibit word reading/facilitate colour naming (or vice versa)
123
Top down control
- goal representations in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) provide top-down biasing of perceptual-motor mappings - working memory provides the representation - inhibition is the resulting process Cognitive control is not a set of independent faculties but an integrated system
124
DLPFC
online maintenance and manipulation of information needed to guide goal-oriented - top down influence of information on decision making behaviour **right DLPFC needed for active suppression of option that appears seductive because of higher payoff (role in value based decision making) direct evidence that free choice is implemented physically in the brain