Final Exam Prep

Question 1

Personal Jurisdiction automatically exits when dealing with

Answer 1

Tagging, personal service on someone in the state, consent, voluntary appearance, and domicile

Question 2

Three Steps of Shoe

Answer 2

Follow these steps when automatic requirements are not met
(1) Minimum Contacts: Are there minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum that are sufficient to establish jurisdiction?
(2) Relatedness: does the claim arise from or relate to contact with the forum?
(3) Reasonableness: What is the burden on the defendant, what are the forum state’s interests, what is an efficient resolution of controversy (evidence/witnesses), what are the shared interests of state in furthering substantive policies (balance interests of competing forums)

Question 3

Passive Consumers

Answer 3

Order by mail, telephone, sales person, and simply accept terms. They do not establish minimum contacts

Question 4

Active Consumers

Answer 4

Dictate terms, vigorously negotiate, and inspect consumers. They establish minimum contacts

Question 5

Stream of Commerce Plus

Answer 5

No minimum contacts exist if there is a placement of product into a stream of commerce and nothing more. Awareness of where the item could end up is not enough and there must be intent or purpose to serve the market within the forum state (ex. designing product for the market in forum state, advertising, providing channels for consumers to reach out to you, etc.)

Question 6

Stream of Commerce Pure

Answer 6

Minimum Contacts exist if you can reasonably anticipate the product will flow into forum state. Putting the product into the stream is enough.

Question 7

Minimum Contacts/Effects test of Intentional Torts

Answer 7

Minimum contacts exist involving intentional torts when the defendant has knowledge the conduct will cause harm to plaintiff in the forum and something about the facts shows that the defendant expressly aimed or targeted the forum state

Question 8

General Jurisdiction

Answer 8

When contacts are so extensive and substantial (continuous and systematic) that the defendant can be said to be at home in the jurisdiction. A person is considered at home when: they’re incorporated, they have a principal place of business (HQ) - no reasonableness check

Question 9

Specific Jurisdiction

Answer 9

What you have to find when contacts in the forum are not considered general (at home)
You must: show that claim arises out of or relates to the defendant’s contacts with the forum and there is a significant connection between the claim and contacts

Question 10

When conducting the reasonableness check for personal jurisdiction

Answer 10

You must show that it is very unreasonable to exercise jurisdiction, not that another would be better

Question 11

Reasonableness of Notice

Answer 11

Consider: how effective, how burdensome, alternatives, and the interests of the state/parties

Question 12

What Rule governs Notice?

Answer 12

Rule 4 - only concerned with 4(c)(e)(h)

Question 13

Federal Courts borrow state service rules of state where

Answer 13

action is brought and service has been made

Question 14

Opportunity to be Heard for private parties

Answer 14

3 prongs:
(1) what are the private interests of the person whose things are being taken
(2) What is the risk of erroneous deprivation/probable value of additional safeguards?
(3) What is the size of the plaintiff’s interest and how costly will it be for the government to use or change procedure?

Question 15

When there is no pre-attachment hearing,

Answer 15

attachment can only occur if exigent circumstances exist

Question 16

Facts and contexts dictate opportunity to be heard and how much process is due

Answer 16

movable/non-movable considerations are important

Question 17

Federal Courts have _______ jurisdiction

Answer 17

Limited

Question 18

State courts have _______ jurisdiction

Answer 18

General

Question 19

Federal Subject-Matter Jurisdiction is concurrent

Answer 19

If you conclude something can be filed in federal court, you can assume it can be filed in state court as well

Question 20

Federal Question SMJ

Answer 20

Must have constitutional and statutory basis. Constitutional (some potential federal issue) is always going to be met. Statute is 28 USC 1331 “arising under.” Satisfied in two ways
(1) Creation Test: someone bringing federal cause of action (assume it is not federal unless it is said that the cause of action was created by a federal statute)
(2) Essential Federal Ingredient Test: trying to figure out if a state cause of action can go to federal court

Question 21

Essential Federal Ingredient Test for SMJ

Answer 21

Does state law claim involve a federal issue that must be resolved?
Is federal issue disputed by the parties?
Is federal issue substantial (big enough of an interest to the federal system as a whole - taxes, protect environment, etc. - not torts or contract disputes)
Would granting jurisdiction upset the federal/state balance?

Question 22

Diversity SMJ

Answer 22

28 USC 1332
Between citizens of different states
Domicile is determined at the time of filing - things that happen after are only relevant if they bear on the intent at the time of filing

Question 23

Citizenship of corporations is determined

Answer 23

In states where they’re incorporated and in states of their principal place of business

Question 24

Partnerships are determined by citizenship of ___ of the partners

Answer 24

all

Question 25

Dropping a party from a case can cure diversity failure, but

Answer 25

a change in a party's citizenship post-filing cannot cure diversity failure

Question 26

Complete diversity

Answer 26

No plaintiff can have the same citizenship as ANY defendant

Question 27

Alienage

Answer 27

28 USC 1332(a)(2) Foreign subjects in which there is ALL US citizens on one side and ALL aliens to the other 28 USC 1332(a)(3) US citizens on one side and aliens as parties as well

Question 28

Amount in Controversy

Answer 28

Not a constitutional requirement, gatekeeping measure to keep small disputes out of federal court, must exceed $75,000 Sum claimed by the plaintiff controls if the plaintiff at the time of filing alleged the amount in good faith

Question 29

Good Faith in AIC exists unless

Answer 29

It is legally impossible for plaintiff to recover statutory minimum; AND the plaintiff knew or should have known it was legally impossible (if something is legally impossible, assume the plaintiff knew or should have known unless you can point to some reason why they could not have known)

Question 30

Aggregation of Claims

Answer 30

Plaintiff only, cannot aggregate claims against different defendants to satisfy amount in controversy unless there is joint and several liability Separate plaintiffs cannot aggregate claims against one defendant

Question 31

Removal

Answer 31

28 USC 1441 When a defendant removes a matter originally filed in state court to federal court Can only work where the plaintiff could have originally brought the case to federal court (requires SMJ analysis)

Question 32

Unanimity Rule

Answer 32

A case can only be removed to federal court if all properly served defendants agree

Question 33

28 USC 1441(c)

Answer 33

Applies when you have at least one federal question claim and at least one claim outside of original/supplemental jurisdiction - you can remove the whole case (claims outside of original and supplemental get severed and sent back to the state)

Question 34

Test for Tagalong Claim

Answer 34

Whether or not there is a common nucleus of operative fact with the anchor claim

Question 35

Swift --> Erie

Answer 35

Federal courts are bound by state legislative and decisional law on matters of substance except where a federal statute or constitution applies

Question 36

Horizontal Choice of Law

Answer 36

Use choice of law rules of the forum state to determine which state law applies when looking at Erie

Question 37

Which decisional law counts?

Answer 37

Federal courts are bound by decisions of highest courts in the state, otherwise they are supposed to look to lower court decisions to predict what the state supreme court would do

Question 38

Forum Selection Clause

Answer 38

With a contractual agreement for jurisdiction - When conflict between federal statute and state law in question exists, the court applies federal statute because if the federal statute is a constitutional exercise of Congress' power and conflicts with state law, it wins under Supremacy Clause Congress has properly exercised power if the law is classified as procedural and it is classified as substantive

Question 39

Federal Rules v. State Law

Answer 39

Federal rules are valid if they comply with the Rules Enabling Act: regulate procedure, doesn't modify, abridge, or enlarge substantive rights If something does not satisfy REA, state law wins

Question 40

Judge-Made Law v. State Law

Answer 40

Hanna/Byrd Combo If applying federal law will not lead to forum shopping or inequitable administration of justice, apply federal law If it does lead to these things, apply state law unless there are countervailing federal interests that outweigh state interests at stake

Question 41

Summary Judgment

Answer 41

Rule 56 Appropriate when there is no dispute of material fact and no reasonable jury could find for one side of the the undisputed issues

Question 42

For a plaintiff to win summary judgement

Answer 42

There must be no genuine dispute of material fact in respect to plaintiff's claim

Question 43

For a defendant to win summary judgement

Answer 43

There must be no genuine dispute of material fact in respect to only one element

Question 44

Twiqbal Affirmative defenses

Answer 44

You have to plead enough facts to state a claim of relief that is plausible on its face. Facial plausibility exists when the plaintiff pleads enough factual content to support claim alleged. Plaintiff has to plead facts that make it seem like guilty explanation is either more plausible than the innocent explanation OR in the same ballpark of plausibility as the innocent one

Question 45

Attorney-Client Privilege

Answer 45

Absolute protection of communications and conversations

Question 46

Work Product Privilege

Answer 46

Attaches to information gathered by parties' agents in anticipation of litigation

Question 47

Fact work product privilege can be overcome with

Answer 47

undue hardship to obtain

Question 48

Attorney's opinion on a case has

Answer 48

absolute protection

Question 49

Joinder

Answer 49

(1) must be procedurally allowed under FRCP (2) Must satisfy any jurisdictional requirements

Question 50

Supplemental Jurisdiction when not all plaintiffs meet AIC

Answer 50

Courts allow this as long as the other requirements of § 1367 are satisfied. One exception: when complete diversity is not satisfied - otherwise jurisdiction is destroyed

Question 51

Rule 18

Answer 51

You can assert any claim against an opposing party (does not have to be related). Applies to plaintiffs and those making counterclaims, crossclaims, and third-party claims

Question 52

Rule 13(a)

Answer 52

Compulsory counterclaims must be raised or they are waived - if it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence and there is a logical relationship

Question 53

Rule 13(b)

Answer 53

Permissive counterclaim can be brought against a person even if it is not related to the original transaction or occurrence - can be brought with a compulsory claim

Question 54

Rule 13(g)

Answer 54

Crossclaim can be brought by parties on the same side of the v (permissive) When a coparty brings a claim against you, unless it is solely for contribution and indemnity, the coparty becomes an opposing party and your obligation to bring a compulsory counterclaim kicks in

Question 55

You can add a party to a counterclaim or crossclaim under 13(h) if

Answer 55

Rule 19 or Rule 20 is satisfied

Question 56

Impleader Rule 14

Answer 56

Joinder of a party who is or may be liable to the defendant party for all or part of the claim against it Takes place when: Plaintiff is accusing someone and someone else has the blame or has to pay - person adding is the third-party plaintiff and the person being added is the third-party defendant

Question 57

Rule 20

Answer 57

Permissive Claim - Plaintiffs or defendants when claims arise out of the same transaction or occurrence and raise at least one common question of law or fact

Question 58

Rule 19

Answer 58

Compulsory Joinder - Courts look at 3 things (1) Is there some party that is necessary or required that is wanted in the litigation? (2) If the party is necessary, the court has to join them if feasible (3) Should show go on? - will prejudice occur

Question 59

Rule 24

Answer 59

Permissive Intervention says there must be a claim or defense that share a common question of law or fact and the judge should find good reason to get you involved Intervention by Right is granted when a statute says you can intervene

Question 60

Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule

Answer 60

Goes with Federal Question SMJ: when trying to find federal question, do not consider actual or anticipated defenses the defendant might offer - just essential elements because issues that "could come up" is not enough

Question 61

Conley Rule for Pleading

Answer 61

A complaint only needs some facts to avoid dismissal. Failure to state a claim only exists when there are no facts to support a claim which would entitle someone to relief

Question 62

Should Show Go on provision questions

Answer 62

How much prejudice will the existing parties or absent parties suffer? Is there some way to limit or shape relief so that prejudice is minimized? Is litigating the case without the absent party a good use or resources? What happens if the case is dismissed? Does the plaintiff has any adequate remedy otherwise?