Final Exam Terms Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Ad Hominem (Argument to the person)

A

Distracting its audience from the evidence that has been presented by focusing instead on the individual presenting the argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Appeal to Questionable Authority

A

One accepts a proposition because it has been endorsed by an agency (even if that agency lacks authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Glittering Generalities

A

Vague references to commonly held values, usually appeal to the reader emotionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Appeal to Pity

A

Asks the audience accept a particular conclusion because he/she has suffered hardship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Appeal to People

A

Citing the authority of the majority, an appeal to false authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Appeal to Force

A

Asks that one accept a proposition because because the failure to do so may result in consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Begging the question

A

Circular reasoning, conclusion is used to prove the premise and them the premise is used to prove the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explaining by Naming

A

One has provided the reasons for the phenomenon because one has identified it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

False Dilemma

A

Suggests one must choose between two propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Searching for the Perfect Solution

A

Unless a proposed course of action will lead to a complete resolution of a problem,, one shouldn’t do anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Slippery Slope

A

Suggests that the acceptance of one propositions will lead inevitably. The arguer claims that a sort of chain reaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Red Herring

A

A statement that distracts one from the real argument. Irrelevant material gets introduced to distract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Straw Person Argument

A

Arguer attempts to diminish the authority of opposing viewpoints by attacking exaggerated or caricatured versions of an opponent’s position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

Moves from a non-representative example to a conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Novice Writers

A

Gathers information that is only somewhat connected to the general topic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Novice vs. Experienced Writers

A

Main difference is in the supporting evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Experienced Writers

A

Work purposefully, using arguable proposition to identify the specific information they need, uses useful sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

4 things to know about your Audience

A

1- Understanding of the target
2- Identify your audience
3- Language use (avoid slang)
4- Background information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

2 Purposes of writing

A

1- Tone (argumentative essay or are you writing for your own enjoyment)
2- Why are you writing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

4 facts about a thesis

A

1- Usually identifies the position you will take in an essay
2- Provides the significance of the argument (why the reader should care)
3- Expresses the principle theme
4- Specific and clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

2 reasons for a Topic Sentence

A

1- The topic sentence clearly articulates the controlling idea and explains the way in which the supporting ides and related to it
2- Provides a “road map” for the writer to follow

22
Q

The 3 Subjective sources of Evidence for writing

A

1- Intuition
2- Personal experience
3- Testimonials

23
Q

The 3 Systematic Forms of Evidence for writing

A

1- Appeal to authority
2- Observational studies
3- Case studies

24
Q

2 ways Statistics proves information

A

1- Averages

2- Surveys

25
Metacognition
Thinking about thinking. Used to assess how well one is learning and how they're strategies are working
26
Short Term Memory
Stores information from sensory memory. Can be lost in short periods of time
27
3 Stages of Memory
1- Encoding 2- Storage 3- Retrieval
28
Encoding
Sensory info --> Short term memory --> long term memory
29
Retrieval
Recovering stored information from memory. Retrieval cues
30
3 ways to input information into long term
1- Rote learning -> the repetition of information 2- Elaborate rehearsal -> the connection of new material with old knowledge 3- Recoding -> the rearranging, changing, grouping of information
31
4 Learning Strategies
1- Cornell Note taking 2- Parallel Note taking 3- SQ3R 4- Colour coding
32
The 3 Sections of Cornell Notes
1st- Note taking column 2nd- Cue column 3rd- Summary space
33
3 steps to Parallel Notes
1- To print off slides or lecture notes before hand 2- Add in meaningful and additional information 3 -Summarize and review
34
Colour Coding- 2 colour methods
1st colour- Identifies important themes | 2nd colour- Identifies important sup themes
35
SQ3R
``` S- Survey Q- Question R- Read R- Recite R- Review ```
36
The 6 stages of Blooms Taxonomy
1- Remember - Recall facts and basic concepts 2- Understand - Explain ideas and concepts 3- Apply - Use info in new situations 4- Analyze - Draw connections among ideas 5- Evaluate - Justify a decision 6- Create - Produce new or original work
37
2 common flaws in Fallacious Arguments
1- Premises or reasons are irrelevant to the conclusion | 2- The structure of the arguments do not provide for a logical relationship between premises and conclusion
38
Annotated Bibliography
Citations with a brief descriptive and evaluative paragraph that will provide the reader with the relevancy, accuracy, and quality of the cited source
39
3 Types of Evidence
1- Anecdotal 2- Sweeping generalizations 3- Overstating the conclusion
40
Anecdotal Evidence
Informal or casual evidence that is collected through personal testimony
41
Sweeping Generalizations
General rule applied to a specific instance
42
Deductive Reasoning
One argues from a standpoint that a categorical statement (statement that applies to all members in a category Ex. Students find math hard) through the assignment of an individual or thing to the category (You are a student), to the conclusion (You find math hard)
43
Inductive Reasoning
Is a mode of argument in which the likelihood of a correct conclusion increases with the amount and kind of relevant evidence Ex. your cousin, sister, and friend find math confusing. You may find math confusing
44
Authoritative Sources
Reliable source because of its authority or authenticity is widely recognized
45
Counter Argument
A possible argument against a thesis or a point being made
46
Argument from a belief
The arguer may offer evidence but that evidence is usually based upon beliefs that the audience may not share
47
Rival Causes
A plausible alternative explanation that can explain why a certain outcome occurred
48
Ambgiuity
An unclear phrase with multiple definitions is used within the argument; therefore, does not support the conclusion
49
Cultural Assumptions
Unassessed beliefs adopted by virtue of upbringing in a society. Raised in a society, we unconsciously take on its point of view, values, beliefs, and practices
50
Fallacies
An error in reasoning. An argument that doesn't conform to rules of good reasoning
51
Scientific Studies
Studies undertaken systematically to employ scientific methods. Rely on publicly verifiable data and cannot be accepted without questioning