Final: Lecture 19 Flashcards

0
Q

Associations (3 main types)

A
  • Are relationships between an exposure and an outcome
  • Artifactual (a.k.a. False) can arise from significant bias and/or extensive confounding, accidental, worst kind we don’t want!
  • Non-causal
  • Causal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Any precursor event/condition/characteristic required for the occurrence of the disease is _______.

A

•Cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Non-causal Associations (2 ways)

A
  1. The disease may CAUSE the exposure (rather than the other way around) Ex. RA leading to physical inactivity
  2. The disease and the exposure are both ass. with a third factor (confounding)

•Coffee drinking and CHD, or Down’s syndrome and birth order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Koch’s Postulate’s (for infectious disease)

A

•4 key postulates for implicating a causal relationship

  1. Must be present in every case of disease
  2. Must not be found in cases of other disease or healthy individuals
  3. Must be capable of isolation, culture and reproducing disease in experimental animals
  4. Must be recovered from experimentally-induced diseased animals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Koch’s Postulate’s Limitations:

A
  • Disease production may require presence of ‘co-factors” that postulates don’t address
  • Viruses can’t be cultured similar to bacteria
  • Not all viruses/bacteria induce clinical disease, carrier and sub-clinical disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The cause of any effect must consist of a constellation of components that act in concert is know as ________.

A

•Mill’s Canons: have to have everything prime and set to cause disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sufficient Cause

A
  • A set of minimal conditions/events that inevitably produce disease
  • A cause which precedes a disease, and if present, the disease will always occur
  • Rare, apart from genetic abnormalities
  • Have multiple, required “components” (termed Component Causes (a.k.a. Risk Factors) that collectively act to induce disease)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Necessary Cause

A
  • A cause which Precedes a disease and has the following relationship with it:
  • Cause must be present for the disease to occur, yet the cause may also be present without the disease occurring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Component Cause (a.k.a. Risk Factor)

A
  • A characteristic that, if present and active, increases the probability of a particular disease
  • Ex. High LDL levels are RF for heart attacks, but not all persons with high LDL suffer from heart attacks
  • Some patients are “primed” or “susceptible” to disease
  • By themselves not enough to cause disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 ways to control/adjust for other factors/characteristics (multiple causation)

A
  • Restriction: (keep out the other factors from study) Ex only include patients ≥65 years of age or don’t allow smokers
  • Matching: (similar characteristics in each group) Ex. match age, gender, disease severity, smoking status ect.
  • Stratification: Categorize patients on exposure levels or disease severity, or other important patient characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inductively-oriented criteria are used:

A
  • Hill’s Guidelines are used
  • “In what circumstances can we pass from the Observed association to a verdict of causation?”
  • Hill disagreed that “hard-and-fast” rules of evidence could be generated by which to judge likelihood of causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hill’s Guidelines**

A

•Causal Inference Process, an interpretive, application process

  1. Strength
  2. Consistency
  3. Temporality
  4. Biologic Gradient
  5. Plausibility

•The higher the number of criteria met, when evaluating an association, the more likely it may be the causal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strength

A
  • Refers to size of the ass.
  • Greater the ass. the more convincing it is that the ass. might acutally be causal
  • A strong ass. is neither necessary nor sufficient for causality and weakness of ass. is neither necessary nor sufficient for absence of causality**
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Consistency (a.k.a. Reproducibility)

A
  • The repeated observation of ass. in different populations under different circumstances in different studies (not just once!)
  • Consistency may still obscure the truth! **
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Temporality*

A
  • Is necessity that the cause precede the effect/outcome in time
  • Time-order also describable: proximate cause (short time interval) Distant cause (long term interval)
  • Did symptoms start an hour after taking or 8 years? you can have an allergic reaction even after the 5th time taking it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Biologic Gradient

A
  • Refers to the observation of a gradient of risk (dose-response) ass. with the degree of exposure
  • Light smokers are 5 times more likely to develop lung cancer than non-smokers compared to heavy smokers who are 15 times
  • Caution: some biological factors demonstrate a threshold effect (no effect until certain level of exposure is reached)
16
Q

Plausibility

A
  • Refers to the biological feasibility the ass. can be understood and explained
  • Issue: plausibility decision on criterion-based from prior beliefs, which may be flawed or incomplete
17
Q

Pitfalls in Causal Research are?

A
  • Bias-Confounding-Effect Modification*(
  • Synergism: interaction of 2 or more presumably-causal variables so that the combined effect is clearly greater than the sum of individual