Final LING 201 Flashcards

(131 cards)

1
Q

Mutual intelligibility

A

Speakers on average can understand each other, so speak different dialects // if not, they speak different language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Politics & Orthography

A

Intelligible varities can be labelled as different languages (SW VS NO, Azeri VS Turkish, Serbian VS Croatian) or unintelligible as dialects (okinawan and JAP, catalan and spanish)

Intelligible can have different orthographic systems (ser VS croa, hindi VS urdu)
Unitelligible may have same orthographic system (cantonese VS mandarin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dialect continuum

A

Gradual transition between two non-mutually intelligible varieties

Conundrum: some speakers might not understand each other, but most nearby speakers can. Not clear where to place boundary.

Ex: Arabic, East slavic, Turkic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Language death

A

when the last native speaker of a language dies (once every 3 months, ubykh, mank, sumer)

language change: latin & romance languages, sanskrit & indic languages, ancient egyptian as coptic

speakers are not evenly distributed : total around 7000, 5000 by less than 100k, 3000 by less than 10k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Language universals

A

Talk more generally about possible and impossible languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Absolute universal

A

Something true for all languages

All languages exhibit linguistic creativity, have stops, vowels, stress, morphology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Universal tendency

A

Is usually but not always true

Syllable structure obeys the sonority principle (rising sonority towards the nucleus and falling sonority away from the nucleus EXCEPT Russian [mgla] ‘mist’

The most common stop phonemes are /p, t, k/ EXCEPT Hawaiian lacks /t/

Most languages have fricatives EXCEPT Hawaiian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Implicational universal

A

Something has to be true if something else is true (presence of marked structure implies presence of unmarked structure)

The presence of front rounded vowels implies the presence of front unrounded vowels

The presence of nasal vowel phonemes implies the presence of oral vowel phonemes

The presence of inflectional affixes implies the presence of derivational affixes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Unmarked

A

linguistic structures or elements that are basic, easy to learn, and cross-linguistically expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marked

A

linguistics structures or elements that are complex, difficult to learn, and cross-linguistically rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

History of English

A

Proto-germanic - 500-0, R
Proto-West-germanic - 0-500, R
Old English - 500-1100
Middle English - 1100-1500
Modern English - 1500-2000
Arbitrary and approximate divisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Language family

A

group of related languages derived from the same ancestor (proto-language)

can be contained in other LF

Linguistic community slips up and resulting halves continue to evolve separately, until MI is lost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indo-european

A

PIE, R, 5000-7000, UKR or TRK

Subfamilies :
Germanic = English, German, Icelandic, Yiddish
Romance = French, Romanian, Spanish, Portuguese
Balto-salvic = Russian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian, Latvian
indo-aryan = Hindi/Urdu, Farsi, Marathi, Punjabi, Bengali
Greek
Albanian..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sound change

A

Phonological change that was once active in the language
- left mark on language
- Physiologically or psychologically motivated
- Same types of processes

Regular and systematic (for all languages and usually for all words)

Reduces intelligibility between varieties with change and those without

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Assimilation (SC)

A

Nearby segments become more similar (properties passed to adjacent segment) extremely common, motivated by coarticulation (easier to pronounce similar segments)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dissimilation

A

nearby segments become less similar, uncommon, motivated by perceptual contrast

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lenition

A

Consonant weakening (C are shorter, more voiced or sonorant), common when next to vowel or sonorant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Rhotacism

A

Alveolar sibilants becoming rhotics, more common in intervocalic contexts (s->r)
ex: latin = appeared in classical latin orthography after -is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Deletion

A

Loss of a segment
ex= middle eng = a->//_#

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Epenthesis

A

Insertion of a segment
ex= middle english = /->d/n_r

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Metathesis

A

Segments changing places
-phonotactics
-avoid undesirable combinations of segments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Great English Vowel Shift

A

Boundary of Middle E and Modern E

Chain shift = series of changes where a change leaves a gap to be filled by the other

Affected long vowels =
- high became vowels
- mid became high
- low became mid front

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Grimm’s law

A

Jacob Grimm, after split of PIE (before split of Proto-Germanic)
vl stops -> vs fricatives (p/f,t/th,k/x)
vc stops -> vs stops (b/p,d/t,g/k)
breathy vc stops -> voiced stops (bh/b, dh/d, gh/g)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Syntactic ungrammaticality

A

Infinite number of grammatical sentences (most are unattested)

Not all sentences are SG (not to do with resulting meaning)

Lan have rules about the combination of words into sentences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Noun
M= plural, possessive D= with determiner
26
Verb
M= past, progressive, 3rd singular D= with auxiliary
27
Adjective
M= comparative, superlative D= with degree word
28
Adverb
M=n/a D= with degree word
29
Preposition
M=n/a D= with noun phrase
30
Determiner
M=n/a D= with noun
31
Lexical categories
Transmit meaning (N, V, adj, adv), tend to be open, easy to update or expand
32
Functional categories
Required by the grammar of the language, usually closed, difficult to update or expand - det, degree words, propositions - complementizers = that, if, whether - conjunctions= and, but, nor - auxiliaries = must, might, can - pronouns = i, we, it
33
Constituency
Within a phrase, some words are more closely connected to each other, can vary in length, tells us something about the grammatical structure of the sentence, same string of words may exibit different structures
34
Substitution Test
Constituents are syntactically interchangeable when same type if replaced by words with same syntactic properties without effecting the grammaticality or syntactic properties = both are constituents some single words can have same syntactic properties as entire phrases (they - noun phrases, do so - verb phrases)
35
Movement test
some phrases can be moved to a different part of the sentence (only constituents can, often at beginning), some contintuents cannot be moved
36
Coordination test
Constituents of the same type can be coordinated using a coordinating conjunction (and, or) Not all syntactic categories can be coordinated (determiners)
37
Syntactic trees
Hierarchical structure that represents internal relations - binary Node - a point and/or everything benearth a point in the tree (syntactic category, always a constituent)
38
X-bar theory
All phrases can be described with the same structure XP = placeholder for any type of syntactic phrase Phrase head = obligatory nucleus of the phrase, endocentric (head always contained within) Specifier = function word at the edge of a phrase, sometimes required, not a phrase on its own Complement = information about the head, sometimes not required, (may be required by the particular head), a phrase on its own Complements are structurally closer to heads than specifiers, purpose of X' node Phrases may have any number of complements, but typically only one specifier (multiple X'nodes possible)
39
Verb phrases
H= verb S= particular types of adverbs, (never, almost, often..) C= optional, varies
40
Noun phrases
H= noun S= determiner C= optional, varies
41
Adjective phrases
H= adj S= degree word (very, quite, hardly) C= optional, PP
42
Adverb phrase
H= adverb S= degree word No C
43
Prepositional phrase
H= preposition C= NP No specifier
44
Merge operation
Constituents can be nested in other constituents must be in line with X-bar schema Recursion?
45
Syntax tree shorthand
If internal structure not important, can be replaced with a shorthand triangle
46
Sentences
Also constituens, with X-bar schema Tense phrase H= Tense (Cover or modal) S= NP C= VP
47
Syntactic ambiguity
Same string of words can correspond to different syntactic structures, with different meaning that is related to the structure
48
Clauses
Constituent that contains a subject and a verb Matrix = entire sentence (multiple smaller clauses) Complementizer = word signals that a clause follows
49
CP structure
Complements = TPs H= complementizer (if, whether, that) Clauses introduced by a complementizer bear overt evidence of a CP tier All TPs are contained in a CP tier (including matrix clauses)
50
Yes-no questions
Only answered with yes or no
51
Inversion in English
Movement of T to C position in questions Appears in Eng yes-no questions = T moves to C, so questions contain a +Q feature (needs to be satisfied)
52
Movement
Can happen in different circumstances for different reasons (satisfy some sort of abstract feature) Does not alter syntactic properties of the elements Leaves a trace t
53
Deep VS surface structure
Deep = before movement Surface = after movement Implies two different levels of syntactic structure
54
Wh-questions
Require another answer Wh-word has same syntactic properties as the information saught in the answer Always in front of the sentence
55
Wh-movement
Difference in word order as result of movement = wh-words/phrases move to specifier of CP Also exhibit inversion
56
Head-complement condition
Head before complement (right-branching), modals precede verbs, verbs precede objects, prepositions, relative clauses follow referent) Head follow complement (left-branching), modals follow verbs, verbs follow objects, postpositions, relative clauses precede referent Some languages exibit both types of structures The position of the specifier with respect to the head is independent
57
Wh-movement parameter
Wh-words move to specifier of CP (eng, spa, fr) Wh-words do not move (mandarin)
58
Verb raising parameter
Raise V to T (separate from inversion T to C) Fr = toujours is a specifier
59
French yes-no questions
Exhibit inversion and verb raising, so V ends up in head of C (like Eng modals)
60
Meaning of sentences
Sentences can be T or F Truth conditions = state of the world under which a sentence is true Know meaning of a sentence = knowing TC (no requirement for the sentence to be true or TC compatible with real world) TC of one sentence may have a logical relation to the TC of another
61
Entailement
A sentence p entails a sentence q if when p is true q is also true = q follows from p, q does not introduce infos not contained in p
62
Equivalence
p is equivalent to q if p entails q and q entails p * p and q mean the same thing * it is impossible to construct a scenario where p would be logically different from q
63
Contradiction
contradicts q if when p is true q is false and when q is true p is false * Both p and q being true would result in a paradox
64
Contrariety
p is contrary to q if when p is true q is false * Both cannot be true, though both can be false
65
Subordination
LR between words A is a subset of B
66
Equivalence (between words)
A and B are the same set
67
Complementarity (words)
A and B are non-overlapping and exhaustive subsets
68
Incompatibility (words)
A and B are non-overlapping (but not necessarily exhaustive) subsets
69
Presupposition
A sentence p presupposes q if p entails q regardless if p is true Presuppositions are part of the common ground, the information shared by the speaker and listener *Presuppositions are context-dependent *Negating the presupposition does not negate the direction of entailment
70
Homonyms
words with the same spelling or the same pronunciation (also both)
71
Homographs
words with the same spelling but not (necessarily) the same pronunciation
72
Homophones
words with the same pronunciation but not (necessarily) the same spelling
73
Polysemes
words with more than one related meaning (almost always spelled the same) - arise due to semantic change (one meaning is extended to refer to a related meaning) - no vagueness (meaning partly defined by the context) = ex, adj or pronouns
74
Synonyms
pairs of words with very similar meanings * True synonymy is rare and, arguably, impossible
75
Antonyms
pairs of words that are ‘opposite’ in some sense *Often used informally *Incompatible scalar adjectives: ‘tall’ vs ‘short’, ‘quick’ vs ‘slow’ *Complementary words: ‘dead’ vs ‘alive’, ‘day’ vs ‘night’
76
Pronouns
Context-dependent by definition (refer to salient element in the conversation, new or previously mentioned) Grammatical properties of the pronouns give us some info about the referent (person, number, gender)
77
Context-dependent adjectives
Describe a value on a scale = scalar adjectives The relevant portion of the scale depends on the noun
78
Implicature
Derive meaning from a sentence that is neither entailed nor presupposed Can be violated
79
Cooperative principle
Contribution required by the goal of the conversation 4 maxims (Gricean) Interpret utterance under the assumption that the speaker is being cooperative
80
Maxim of relevance
Be relevant to the goal of the conversation Assume that collocutor is providing information that is related to what we are talking about If info appears irrelevant on the surface, we try to think of a scenario where it would be relevant
81
Maxim of quantity
Say as much as is required by the goal of the conversation Assume that speaker is not omitting important information Everything that is said is construed to be relevant
82
Maxim of quality
Do not say what you think is false and do not say what you lack evidence for People lie and say unsubstantiated things = subverting principles = structure of the conversation rests on the assumption that people are honest Not-jokes
83
Maxim of manner
Make your contribution as clear as possible (avoid obscurity and ambiguity, bried and orderly)
84
Newborns
Respond differently to humain voices, preference to their parent's voices Perceive all acoustic contrasts as equally different At 8months, perception becomes attuned the phonological contrasts of their language specifically (lose ability to reliably distinguish between contrasts not found in their language)
85
Babbling stage
6mo-12mo develop control over their articulators (necessary for linguistic development) lot of cross-linguistic similarities between babnling in children of different ages (language independent, no linguistically marked structures (rare phenemes are absent even if these are present in the ambient language, simple syllable structure)
86
Acquisition of phonemes
Vowels before C, stops are first C acquired Labial > alveolars> velars>alveopalatals (diff from language universals) Onsets before codas
87
Early phonetic processes
Immature productions of particular words often reflect a child's inability to produce certain sounds or certain phonological structures Similar to phonological processes observed in adult grammar (underlying representation is modified by various processes, but different = ungrammatical even by children themselves, often sporadic (non-regular) in their application)
88
Syllable deletion
Stressed syllables are more prosodically prominent than unstressed syllables, so deleted from the output (particularly in the middle of the word)
89
Syllable simplification
CV is best syllable shape (complex onsets and codas are avoided, codas are avoided altogether) Syllable structure repaires through deletion (the more sonorant element is deleted)
90
Stopping
Affect properties of segements rather than individual segments obstruent ->stops
91
Fronting
consonant -> alveolar
92
Gliding
liquid -> glide
93
Denasalization
consonant ->oral
94
Assmiliation (Children)
Common cross-linguistically (common in children's speech) Long distance place assimilation Vc obstruents are more common in the speech of children than vs obstruents - due to assimilation in voicing to the following vowel/sonorant (lenition)
95
Vocabulary development
18mo = around 50 words between 1,5-6yo = vocabulary acquired rapidly (around 14k words by 6yo) lot of variation between children lot of similarity between languages general trends = nouns first, words with concrete meanings before words with abstract meanings, lexical items before functional items
96
Acquiring new words
Difficult task (world full to objects and properties, natural phenomena are gradient and not clearly delineated, many words are not observable phenomena) several assumption that children tend to make when acquiring the meaning of a new word
97
Overextension
the acquired meaning is more general than the intended meaning *Overuse of type assumption or basic level assumption -Some evidence that the child is aware of the mistake and that overextension is a strategy to compensate for limited vocabulary *Once the child acquires the intended target, they modify the original meaning
98
Underextension
the acquired meaning is more specific than the intended meaning *Underuse of type assumption and basic level assumption
99
Whole object assumption
the word refers to the whole object
100
Type assumption
refers to a type of thing
101
Basic level assumption
refers to objects that are alike in basic ways
102
Morphological overgeneralization (3stages)
1- words are memorized whole (no evidence of morphology) 2- inflectional morphology overgeneralized (errors not found in adult speech, strong evidence of morphology, no irregular morphology yet) 3- adult-like morphology
103
One word stage
1-1,5yo one word used to convert an entire utterance, typically the most informative word in the utterance is used
104
Two word stage
1.5-2yo limited number of sentential patterns (N+V, N+N) almost complete absence of functional items
105
Telegraphic stage
2-2.5yo longer sentences some functional items and inflectional morphology still missing Rapid development after the telegraphic stage = syntactic movement acquired later on
106
When you speak about yourself
Speech to carry info about the meaning, but also information about the speaker (linguistic features as members of a particular speech community, called indexes) Indexes are subconscious or used consciously to build speaker identity Ex= creaky voice/vocal fry (danish for info, english for indexical information (young, female, lower level of education, friendly, casual..))
107
Free variation
allophony not conditioned by phonological environment * Random variation from the perspective of phonology * No variation is truly free or random * Sociolinguistic factors (variety, who, what is situation, mood, blood-alcohol level...)
108
English unreleased stops
p¬, t¬,k¬ = no release following the stop, complete silence in eng = vs stops in free-variation with unreleased stops in word-final position (otherwise, always released = sometimes released at the end, depends largely on sociolinguistic factors)
109
Speech community
a group of speakers who share sociolinguistic norms about language use * Speakers sound like the people they speak to * Pockets of similar sounding speakers develop over time * Speech communities form across several salient sociological dimensions: (Geography, Age, Socio-economic class, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexual orientation * Features that are prescriptively incorrect are often part of a stigmatized speech community * Reminder: prescriptive norms are social in origin not linguistic * Even within a speech community, the grammar of every speaker is unique * Everyone speaks their own idiolect
110
Dialect
geographically separate mutually intelligible speech variety * Cockney, Newfie, Scots, New Zealand... all dialects of English
111
Accent
phonetic component of a dialect * Outside of linguistics: the pronunciation of a non-standard or non-local variety * In linguistics: all dialects are associated with an accent * Everyone has an accent Geographic separation is linguistic separation * The farther someone is, the harder it is to communicate with them * Dialects eventually become languages as mutual intelligibility decreases over time
112
Variation over time
Speakers of different ages belong to different speech communities * Even in the same dialect, older speakers do not sound like younger speakers * Assumption: individuals generally do not alter their speech over time * Once you finish acquiring your native language as a teen, your speech variety becomes less malleable * 60 year-olds today roughly sound like 20 year-olds 40 years ago * The assumption is mostly but not completely true * The speech of older speakers is still a little bit malleable, but noticeably less so
113
Real time study
Measuring the same variable at different points in time * Accurate but extremely time-consuming
114
Apparent time study
Measuring the same variable at one point in time across different age groups * Some error * Differences in age groups reflect past (and future!) trends * Older speakers will eventually disappear * Replaced by young speakers
115
Overt prestige
when linguistic features associate the speaker with a high socio-economic class * Often correlated with the standard dialect or prescriptive notions
116
Covert prestige
when non-standard linguistic features associate the speaker with a desired but non-standard speech community * Dialectal features * Makes one sound local and not foreign * Features of non-standard varieties * Makes one sound worldly and casual
117
Variation and class
Linguistic prestige is correlated with socioeconomic class * Linguistic prestige is also correlated with social situation * Official situations or situations where the feature is more salient * Increased articulatory effort goes to increasing linguistic prestige * Speakers just below the highest strata of society overcompensate * Use more prestigious features than those in the highest strata in official or salient situation
118
Class and gender
119
Algonquin
Grouped with Witot and Yurok languages as Algic Cree, Ojibwe, Blackfoot, Mohican Around 150k people across southern canada and US
120
Na-Dene
Only one with relative in Eurasia (Dene-Yeniseian language family) Navajo, Dogrib, Chipewyan Around 20k speakers in NW canada and Southern UN
121
Eskimo-Aleut
Inuktitut, Greenlandic, Aleut Around 40k speakers in Nothern and NE Canada, Alaska and Greenland
122
Siouan
Canadian prairies and US MidWest
123
Salishan
British Columbia and Washington state
124
Wakashan
Western BC and Vancouver Island
125
Tsimshianic
N BC
126
Iroquoian
Around Great Lakes region (heavily endangered) And more in US, other parts in North America and in South America
127
Language isolates of Canada
A language with no known relatives (Basque, Korean..) Haida = in NBC Ktunaxa = SE BC
128
Lang of Canada Phonology
Algonquin = simple C and V inventories West Coast = complex C inventories Labial segments = less common in Indigenous lang of NA (some lack them, mostly rare)
129
Clusivity
Pronouns/verbs inflected for clusivity Inclusive we = speaker + listener + third parties Exclusive we = speaker + third parties only Marked by inflectional morphology (Algonquin, Iroquoian, Siouan, Wakashan) Also in languages outside of the Americas (Georgian, Tagalog, Ainu)
130
Proximate
Nearby of salient in the conversation
131
Obviative
Distant or not salient in the convo, known as 4th person Many Algonquin languages and Ktunaxa have a separate morpheme for the obviative