Final Revision Flashcards
(220 cards)
Do we prefer restorative material core with or without a post?
without a post b/c no further structure is removed
For which teeth does the restorative material core without a post, works best and why?
best for molars b/c of large pulp chamber space where core material will be placed
but for premolars and anteriors as well
Core retention can be obtained using:
undercuts slots grooves boxes pulp chamber !! root canals !! pins bonding
Core definition:
= center/base of a structure
- restores sufficient coronal anatomy of a vital or endo treated tooth
When is the choice of core not important?
where there is substantial residual coronal dentin
SOS
When we should use a post? (indications)
- if only 1 cavity wall is remaining./less than 2 axial cavity walls or if there are no cavity walls
- if teeth are used as RPD abutments
- a wall less than 2 mm thickness (not consider as wall)- 1 mm
- when the residual tooth structure is not enough to retain the core/ to retain a core in a tooth with extensive loss of coronal tooth structure !!!! it should be used only if there are no other options to retain a core
- if high tooth length over bone crest
- if less than half of the residual tooth
- for retention of core
- Premolars: small pulp chamber so require more often a post than molars
- Molars: post placed in largest and straightest canal, not used that often
- Anteriors: when there is thin remaining tooth structure after RCT and crown prep, they have small pulp chambers so need posts (not enough R and retention)
- lateral forces and teeth positions are another reason to know when a post is needed
- determined by the remaining coronal tooth structure and the functional tooth requirements
- posts do not make the roots/teeth stronger !!!!!!!
When you should consider a core ‘a build up’?
when it contributes to the strength and retention of a crown preparation
When you should consider a core ‘a filler’?
when it alters the shape of the prep in order to eliminate undercuts
Characteristics of the ideal core material:
stable in wet env easily manipulated rapid, hard set for immediate crown prep high compressive and tensile strength high modulus of elasticity (rigid) high fracture toughness inert (no corrosion) cariostatic properties (inhibit the formation of dental caries) biocompatible cheap
Core material examples:
composite resin, amg, resin-modified glass ionomer, glass ionomer
ADV Vs DISADV of Composite Resin:
ADV:
strong, used in thinner sections than AMG, fast-setting, doesn’t contain mercury, aesthetic, doesn’t always need matrix placement, can bond to most of the current post systems, can be dual-cured or self-cured, better bonding if resin luting cements are used, different delivery systems, different consistencies, can be used as a luting cement and core material at the SAME TIME, can be bonded
DISADV:
high technique sensitivity (shrinks), difficult isolation for deep cavities, same color with tooth and core so difficult to distinguish between them, incompatible with ZOE sealer, many adhesive systems incompatible with dual or self cured composites, relies on multi-stage dentin bonding requiring effective isolation
ADV Vs DISADV of Amalgam:
ADV:
not technique sensitive, strong, good sealing (no shrinkage), CAN BE BONDED, contrast with tooth (can distinguish them)
DISADV:
best to set 24h before tooth prep, weak in thin section, not aesthetic, contains mercury
Recommendations of Composite Resin Vs Amalgam:
Composite Resin:
for all teeth, for interim restoration (provisional use) - takes longer than amg, material of choice, post cementing, core build up, cementing of restoration
Amalgam:
for posteriors, for interim restoration (provisional use), for pin retention (avoid it), for long term use, core build up
Resin-modified glass ionomer ADV Vs DISADV:
ADV:
bonds with tooth, stronger than GIC, light cured - adv when you use it as a base (not for metal restorations), FLUORIDE RELEASE, biocompatible, replaces many GICs today
DISADV:
weaker than AMG and composite, ABSORBS WATER and swells leading to porcelain crack
Recommendations for Resin-modified glass ionomer Vs Glass ionomer
filler Vs build up core?
useful FILLERS but not as core build up materials
Glass ionomer ADV Vs DISADV:
ADV:
bonds with tooth, FLUORIDE RELEASE
DISADV:
weak material, tends to crack, radiolucent, little improvement in physical properties
Nayyar core:
for posterior teeth and badly broken down teeth needs 2-4 mm coronal GP removal used with cuspal coverage condensation of AMG into canal orifices alternative to post
Endocrown:
ceramic restoration and then bond it not for long term high technique sensitive no need for post and core keep enamel in order to bond alternative to post
Types of post:
active/passive, parallel/tapered, prefabricated/custom-made, metal/fiber/zirconium
SOS
Ideal post properties:
biocompatible, cheap, radiopaque, aesthetic, similar mechanical properties to dentin, retrievable, resistant to fracture, not technique sensitive, min prep required for post space
SOS
Active Vs Passive posts:
Active:
= engages with the root dentin via threads and gain retention from this (act like screws)
-more retentive than passive posts (most retentive system we have)
-no longer recommended b/c they cause high stresses into the root and microcracks leading to root fracture!!
-should be used to short roots
Passive:
= sits in the prepared canal space without engaging with the dentin
-for retention
-retained by luting agent
-more favorable stress distribution when post is situated passively !!!!
SOS
Parallel Vs Tapered posts:
Parallel:
- more retentive
- induce less stress to the root due to less wedging effect so less risk of root fracture
- require more dentin removal so higher risk of perforation
Tapered:
-for thin roots and delicate morphology teeth !!!!!!!!
-most systems combine both of them together
SOS
Custom-made posts DISADV Vs ADV Pre-fabricated posts:
Custom-made posts: (cast)
-more conservative most of the times
DISADV
-requires 2 appointments (temporization and laboratory fees)
-temporary crowns/posts are ineffective in preventing contamination of the RC b/w visits
-expensive
-leak a lot
-higher chance of mistakes since more appointments
Pre-fabricated posts: ADV -1 appointment -cheaper -easier -many different sizes and materials available -used to avoid core decementation
SOS
Custom-made posts/cores indications:
- when multiple teeth require posts
- when tooth is misaligned (achieves proper alignment with adjacent teeth)
- for tapered roots and roots with substantial concavities (mandibular I and maxillary P1)
- oval shape RC (pre-fabricated are for round shapes)