FL Negotiable insturments- UCC article 3 Flashcards
(32 cards)
how is it tested
- multiple choice when business organizations tested
definitions: note
- 2 parties
- a promise to pay, like to pay a car/house
- maker= person who makes promise to pay
- payee= person who is going to be paid
defintion: draft (bill of exchange)
drafts are checks, traveler’s checks or cashiers’ checks which differ from promissory notes
3 parties
draft= order to pay
(1) drawer is the person ordering the (2) drawee to pay the (3) payee
definition: checks
a draft is a three party negotiable instrument in which the drawer orders the second party (drawee) to pay sum of money to payee.
common draft
* “i order you to pay someone”
* you (drawee) can put stop payment
* cashiers check= where drawer and drawee are the same bank “I, bank, order myself to pay this person”
* again, the drawee (bank) can stop payment
* in either check type (common or cashiers) only drawee can stop payment
promissory note
two party instrument in which maker promises to pay a sum of money to the payee
definition: negotiable instrument
- Article 3 designed to treat something like cash, when it is not cash
- paper which is flexible in nature
- 1st person giving it to other people and they use it with the same value= negotiable
- like assignment, but much easier
- negotiable instrument is:
1. written
2. signed by maker of note/drawer for draft/check
3. must contain unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of $ (must be money, not other commodity like gold)
4. payable to either order or bearer (whoever is in possession of it can seek payment on the note)
5. payable at definite time
(order=a named person/persons/identifiable thing. sometimes referred to as “order paper”) (An instrument that does not include a specific date on which payment will occur is deemed to be payable upon demand)
(bearer= person who hold instrument. can also be check made payable to “cash”, that would be a bearer paper)
if it does not meet these standards, it is still a contract
(6) without additional undertaking or instruction
definition: holder
- a person entitled to enforce the instrument
- they can cash the instrument
- agent can be considered holder
enforcement of instruments
persons entitle to enforce an instrument: holder in due course o non-HDC
HDC status (holder with extra protections )
* for value
* in good faith
* without notice of certain infirmities of the instrument like forgery, alteration, or other irregularities
VVVVVVVVVVV
Accord and satisfaction by use of instrument – unliquidated (i.e., disputed) claim can be discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted in good faith tenders an instrument or an accompanying written statement that contains a conspicuous statement
VVVVVVVVVV
A person may be able to enforce an instrument that has been lost, destroyed, or stolen if the person was in possession of the instrument and entitled to enforce it at the time of loss.
special rules: rules of construction
- 3 things in check/note
1. handwritten= overrules anything typed/printed
2. typed= overrules printed
3. printed (pre-printed form)
(in any of these forms, text overrides numbers, two dollars > $2.00)
special rules: incomplete instruments –> blank payment dates
- if you forget to put date of payment on check, payable immediately
special rules: incomplete instruments –> blank amount
- may still be valid negotiable instrument, if agreement beforehand that payee will fill it out later
- otherwise, invalid
negotiation: definition
- Negotiation is the delivery by a person other than the maker or drawer of an instrument to any other person.
- the point where we want to transfer negotiable instrument to someone
- the consequence of a negotiation is that the person receiving the instrument obtains the status of a holder.
- initial issuance of instrument is not negotiation, its issuance
- 1st person in note is never a holder in due course, its typically the 2nd purchasor (negotiated to them, not issued to them)
negotiation= bearer instruments
- negotiate= transfer possession
- give it to them
- whoever has it, has $
A bearer instrument names no specific payee, and negotiation of a bearer instrument occurs upon delivery of the instrument.
a bearer instrument can be negotiated by anyone in possession of it, the note is a negotiable bearer instrument.
* even if that person came into possession involuntarily (e.g., by theft).
* This means that the prior holder lost possession involuntarily, not that the thief’s actions were involuntary.
negotiation= order instruments
- made payable to identifiable person
- negotiate= sign the bank indorsement
- then transfer posession to person
requires an indorsement to be properly negotiated. There are two main types of indorsements:
* special indorsement—the current payee signs and names a new payee. This creates an order instrument.
* blank indorsement—the current payee signs the note and does not name a new payee. This turns the order instrument into a bearer instrument.
* and vice-versa, this can go on and on, order paper can become bearer paper and bearer paper can become order paper
negotiation: fraudulent indorsement
- if someone makes check payable to me, and someone else comes in and signs for me, this is a forged signature
- no effect on my liability on check
holder in due course: memorize requirement
- a holder in due course is a holder:
- it was negotiated to you
- for value (you paid)
- in good faith
- without notice of defects (defenses/claims)
holder in due course: for value
- some sort of value, not gift
- can never be holder in due course if it was given to you as a gift
holder in due course: for value==> payment for oversure invoice
considered “For value”
holder in due course= “For value”–> birthday gift check
- i give check to a, they negotiate to b for their birthday
- not “for value”
holder in due course= good faith
- reasonable commercial standards
- honesty in fact (Check wording with someone else)
holder in due course= notice of “Certain things”
- examples
1. overdue instrument= check issued more than 90 days ago is a defect and you can not be a holder in due course
2. knowledge of forgery in history of check= cannot be holder in due course
defenses
- you have a checknote and you are going to enforce it (cash it in)
defenses: real defenses
infancy, incapacity, duress, illegality, fraud in factum
* Fraud in factum–fraud on the instrument
can be raised against HDC
* You can never sue drawee= the bank
* maker of note is always liable
* drawer is always liable
* have to sue them to do this
* they are entitled to defenses, real and personal defenses
defenses: real defenses types
Defenses against enforcement by non-HDC
- fraud in factum (forgery)
- alteration of instrument
- adjudicated incompetency at time of making instrument
- infancy (less than 18 yo at time of making instrument)
- illegality
- duress when making instrument
- discharge in bankruptcy
- discharge known by HDC
- surety defenses
- statute of limitation
FFAAIIDDDSS or IF DAD SAID SFS?