Forensic Flashcards
(116 cards)
Offender profiling
Police build a picture of who they are looking for to help make an arrest
What is the top-down approach to offender profiling?
Based on 36 interviews with sexually motivated serial killers
Starts with a general classification of the crime scene into organised or disorganised
Profilers will match what is known about the crime to a pre-existing template
This classification informs subsequent police investigation
What are the characteristics of an organised criminal?
- crime is planned
- victim is specifically targeted
- body transported from the scene
- weapon is hidden
- high intelligence
- socially and sexually motivated competent
- have a car
- follow their crimes in the media
What are the characteristics of a disorganised criminal?
- crime is unplanned
- victim is randomly selected
- offender is unlikely to engage with victim
- sexual acts are performed after death
- weapon and clues may be found at crime scene
What happens after classification (top-down offender profiling)?
Once they have matched the crime to a pre-existing template, profilers can construct a profile
This includes hypothesis about the offender’s background, habits, beliefs, etc.
Used to work out a strategy of investigation
Profilers also consider how the offender is likely to react if they are being investigated
What is a strength of top-down profiling? APPLICATION+
Supportive evidence: APPLICATION
Arthur Shawcross was a serial killer who was found using this approach
He murdered 11 prostitutes after being released from prison
He was profiled correctly as a white male, lower mental age, low paid jobs, etc.
What is a limitation of top-down profiling? RELIABILITY-
Evidence doesn’t support the disorganised offender
David Canter analysed data from 100 murders in the USA using smallest space analysis
The details of each case were analysed with reference to 39 characteristics thought to be typical of organised and disorganised killers
Findings: suggested evidence of a distinct organised type, not the case for disorganised though. -> undermines the classification system as a whole
What is a limitation of top-down profiling? APPLICATION-
Only applies to particular crimes
Best suited to crime scenes that reveal something about the offender e.g. rape, arson, cult killings as well as crimes involving macabre practices e.g. sadistic torture, body dissection and acting out of fantasies
More common offences such as burglary or destruction of property (or even murder or assault during the course of this) don’t lend themselves to profiling as crime scene doesn’t say much about them
What is a limitation of top-down profiling? VALIDITY-
Based on outdated models of personality
The classification system is based on the assumption that offenders have behavioural patterns and motivations that remain consistent across situations and contexts
Alison et al. (2002) suggests this is naive and informed by old-fashioned models of personality that side behaviour as being driven by dispositional traits rather than ext. factors -> can be constantly changing
What is the bottom-up approach to offender profiling?
Canter’s bottom-up approach looks for consistencies in the offenders behaviour during the crime
These can be inferred from the crime scene, or the surviving victims accounts
No initial assumption is made about the offender until a statistical analysis using correlational techniques has been carried out on the details of the cases
This approach relies heavily on computer databases being accurate
This approach can be considered more objective and reliable
What is investigative psychology?
Inputting data into the data system and receiving a profile we can correlate with crimes
Aim is to establish patterns of behaviours that are likely to happen - or co-exist - across crime scenes (in relation to offender profiling)
This is to develop a statistical “database” which acts as a baseline for comparison
Specific details about an offence or related offences can be matched against the database to reveal important info about the offender.
May also determine if a series of offences are linked
Geographic profiling
Uses information to do with the location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about the likely home or operational base of an offender - known as crime mapping
Can also be used in conjunction of psychological theory to create hypotheses about how the offender is thinking as well as their modus operandi
The assumption is that serial offenders restrict their “work” to areas they are familiar with, so understanding the spatial pattern of their behaviour provides investigators with a “centre of gravity” - likely to include offenders base
Also allows investigators to make educated guesses as to where they might strike next “jeopardy surface”
What is Canter’s circle theory? (geographic profiling - bottom-up)
Canter and Larkin proposed two models of offender behaviour: The marauder (who operates in close proximity to their home) The commuter (who is likely to have travelled a distance away from their usual residence) The pattern of offending is likely to form a circle around their usual residence (becomes more apparent, the more offences) Such spatial decision-making can give the investigative team important insight into the nature of the offence (e.g. planned or opportunistic). It also reveals info about offender (e.g. "mental maps", mode of transport, employment status, approx age, etc.)
Limitations of the bottom-up approach?
- anomalies
- inaccurate victim accounts
- human error
- eye-witness testimony
- data being lost (e.g. by computers crashing or being hacked)
- not all crimes are reported
- leading questions impacting the accuracy of data (surviving victims)
What is the atavistic form (historical biological explanation)?
Using Darwin’s theories, Lombroso thought criminals were a separate species of mankind
He suggested criminals were throwbacks to an earlier species
Atavistic means a tendency to revert to an ancestral type (developed characteristics of ancestors, rather than modern)
He professed that criminals could be identified by a series of distinguishing physical characteristics such as:
-asymmetrical face
-unusually large or small ears
-a low receding forehead
-prominent eyebrows, jawbones or cheekbones
What were the three types of criminals identified by Lombroso?
Born criminals - the atavistic type
Insane criminals - suffering from mental illness
Criminaloids - mental characteristics predisposed them to criminal behaviour under the right circumstances
What is a gene?
Part of a cell in a living thing which controls its physical characteristics, growth, and development
Is there genetic basis for criminal behaviour?: Lange study into twins and criminal behaviour
He studied 13 MZ twins and 17 DZ twins where at least one in each pair had served time in prison
10 MZ twins had their co-twin who was also in prison
MAOA has been associated with aggression
It regulates the metabolism of serotonin in the brain
Low levels of serotonin are linked with impulsive and aggressive behaviour
CHD13 linked to ADD and substance abuse
Research support for CHD13 and MAOA genes?
Tiihonen (2015) 900 found low MAOA activity and also low activity of the CHD13 gene
They estimated around 5-10% of all violent crime in Finland is due to abnormalities in one of these two genes
Diathesis stress (biological explanation - genetics)
If genetic do have some influence it would seem likely that this is at least part moderated by the environment
A tendency towards criminal behaviour may come about through genetic predisposition and biological or psychological trigger - i.e. having criminal role models
Research support for diathesis stress (biological explanation - genetics)
Mednick (1984) conducted an adoption study of 13,000 Danish adoptees
Compared likelihood of the adoptee having a criminal record considering if their biological or adoptive parents did
The percentages show the biological link is stronger, however environmental still has an impact:
No criminal record for biological or adoptive: 13.5%
Biological parents had criminal record: 20%
Biological and adoptive parents had criminal record: 24.5%
Biological explanations: neural explanations
Neural explanations consider how brain structures may be different in criminals as well as there being differences in neurotransmitter levels
Biological explanations: neural explanations (brain structure)
- Pre-frontal cortex (deals with decision-making)
Raine (2004) 71 brain imaging studies showed that criminals have reduced functioning in the pre-frontal cortex. Lowered activity in this area is associated with loss of control. - Limbic system
This is made up of structures such as the thalamus and the amygdala, which are linked to emotion.
Raine (1997) found murderers who were not guilty by reason of insanity has reduced activity in the limbic system.
Biological explanations: neural explanations (neurotransmitters)
- Serotonin
Researchers suggest that low levels of this neurotransmitter may predispose individuals to aggressive and criminal behaviour.
Serotonin inhibits the prefrontal cortex. Dopamine hyper-activity may enhance this effect. - Noradrenaline
Very high and very low levels have been associated with aggression and criminal behaviour.
High levels are associated with activation of the sympathetic nervous system and the fight or flight response e.g. someone bumps into them accidentally, they may go into fight (esp. if can’t process emotions)/flight response
Low levels would reduce the ability for people to react to perceived threats