Forensic Psychology Flashcards
(39 cards)
Cognitive Explanations
outline Kohlberg theory
- there are 3 unniversal levels of moral reasoning - characterised by logic
- Pre conventional level (punishment orientation)
- conventional level (maintenance of social order)
- post conventional level (morality of contract or certain indivduals)
- criminals have childlike immature sense of reasoning - will reason at the pre conventional level
- non criminals reason at conventinal or post conventional - display more civil and empathetic behaviour
Cogntive Explanations
define cogntive distortion
- dysfunctional thought processing where we show errors in our logic.
- Hostile attribution bias- judging ambigious situations or the actions of others as agressive/ threatening when it reality its not
- minimalisation- coping mechanism for guilt or regret, where offenders will under-exaggerate the significance of their crimes and the emotional consequences suffered by their victims
cogntive explanations
Minimalisation support
barbaree
* 26 concited rapists
* 54% denied they committed a crime
* 40% minimsied the harm they had caused
Pollock and Hashmall
* 35% of a sample of child molester said crime committed was non sexual ad 36% said child had consented
cognitive explanations
histile attribution bias support
Justye
* 55 offenders were presented with images of emotionally ambigious facial expression.
* compared to Control group - violent offenders were more likely to percieve images as angry/ hostile
Dodge and Frame
* children were showed ab ambigious orivation where the intention wasnt hostile ]children judged as agressive wer emore likely o percive the situation as hostile
Offender profiling
Top Down approach
FBI method to assign offenders to either organised or disorganised offenders
(Created by self report from 36 criminals p- rape or murder)
Organised: socially competent, planned crime, intelligent and don’t live alone
Disorganised: socially inept, random attacks,live alone and unemployed
Offender profiling
4 stages of top down approach
Profile generations includes 4 steps:
Collect information from crime scene
Classify type of crime
Reconstruction of crime scene
Generate criminal profile
Limitation of top down approach
Lacks generalisability
Based on sample of 36 criminals that conduct horrific crimes
Can’t trust validity as self report method
And criminal traits areant applicable tot other crimes that involves material such as theft or fraud
As visible characteristics are unlikely to be idenfied
So only apply to blue collar crime
Limitations of top down approach
Unlikely that all offenders are able to identify as either organised or disorganised
Oversimplified classification system
More helpful to study the motives that each criminal has
So contradictory crimes can still be explained- no clues left at scene by appears to be sexually incompetent and impulsive attack
What is the bottom up approach
Uses no preestablished typology
Develops a profile as the crime scene and eyewitness testimonies are analysed
GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING
Offender has an operational base -inferred by mapping locations of previous crimes - circle theory
Canpredict future crimes
Marauders or commuters
INVESTIGATIVE PROFILING
Emphasis importance of time and place clinks to geographical profiling
Way the uttendo treats victim reflects functioning in real life
- all based on assumption that the way attendees behave is constant
What are the five charactersistic identified using bottom up approach
Location
Criminal history
Domestic and social history
Personal characteristics
Occupational y educational history
Limitations of bottom up approach
Doesn’t always lead to correct identification of offender
Copson found that information from an offender profile only led to successful identification of the offender in 3% of cases
But was useful 38% of time
Decided it’s best reserved for simply narrowing the filed and opposed to being relied upon as only way of identification
Strength of bottom up approach
Scientific methods of enquiry
Scientific methods of enquiry and statistical tests
Use of psychological theory compared to the top down approach which is over simplified
Strength of bottom up approach
Geographical profiling
Canter
120 murder cases with serial killers
Smallest space analysis showed consistency in spatial behaviour
All cases had a centre of gravity
And boilers based on was in the middle of the circle
Effect was more noticeable for marauders than commuters
Thus supporters claim that geographical and spatial information is key in profiling an offender
Limitation of a top down approach
Outdated model
Based on assumption that offenders have patterns in behaviours that remain constant over situations
Alison et al suggested that that the approach is naive and is old fashioned models of personality
As it sees behaviour as being driven by stable dispotional traits rather than external factors that may be constantly changing
Is a static approach that is likely to have poor validity when profiling offender or guessing next move
Atavistic form
Historical approach
Lombroso Suggested that criminals were genetic throwbacks
Primiative sub species who were biologically different to non criminals
Had been credited for moving criminology into a more rigours and scientific realm - foundations of offender profiling
Criminals seen as lacking evolutionary development, savage nature meant its impossible to fit in and adjust to civilised society and thus turn to crime
What are atavistic characteristics
Would have possession of physiological markers that were linked to particular crime
Narrow sloping brow
Strong jaw
High cheekbones
Face asymmetry
Dark skin
Murderers- bloodshot eyes curly hair and long ears
Sexual deviants- glinting eyes swollen lips and projecting ears
Criminals also expected to have insensitivity to pain, use of criminal slang, tattoos and unemployment
Lombrossos research into atavistic characteristics
Examined facial and cranial features of hundreds of Italian concurs
And found that the atavistic form was associated with a number of physical anamolies
380 dead criminals and 3800 living ones
40% of all criminal acts are committed by people with atavistic characteristics
Strengths of lombrossos research into atavistic characteristics
Contribution to criminology
Father of modern criminology
Shifted emphasis in crime research away from a moralistic discourse towards are more scientific and credible realm of evolutionary influences and genetics
Influenced beginning of criminal profiling
Limitations of lombrosos research
Scientific racism
There are distinct racial undertones to lombrosos work
Characteristics such as curly hair and dark skin found within African people
Descriptor of atavistic. Wing uncivilised and primitive - supports the eugenic philosophies of the time
Socially sensitive
Limitations of lombrosos research into atavistic form
Contradictory evidence
Goring et al tried to establish whether there were any physical or mental abnormalities among the criminal classes
Conducted comparison between 3000 criminals and 3000 non criminals
Condlcuded that there was no evidence that offenders have unusual facial, and crania, characteristics
Biological explanations of criminality
Genetic explanations
TWIN STUDIES AND ADOPTION STUDIES
- suggests that offenders inherit a gene or combination of genes that predispose them to crime
TWIN STUDIES
Lange studied 13 identical twins and 17 non identical twins swhere one of each twins had served time in prison
10 of MZ twins had a co twin in prison
Compared to only 2 DZ twins
Therefore there must be genetic factors
ADOPTION STUDIES
Crowe found that adopted children who had a biological parents with a criminal record had a 50% risk of having a criminal recoed
Whereas, adopted children whose mother didn’t have a criminal record only had a 5% risk
biological explanations for criminality
GENETIC EXPLANATION
CANDIATE GENES AND DIATHESIS STRESS MODEL
CANDIDATE GENES
genetic analysis of 900 offenders reve,aged abnormalities on two genes that may be associated with violent crime MAOA genes ( dopamine and serotonin in the brain ) and CDH13 ( linked to substance abuse)
Those with the hig risk combinations were 13 times more likely to have a history of violent behaviour
DIATHESIS STRESS MODEL
Genetics moderated by effects of the environment
Combination of genetic predispotjon and biological or psychological freighter
Biological explanations for criminality
neural explanations
anti social personality disorder is associated with reduced emotional response and lack of empathy for others
Prefrontal cortex: APD have reduced activity in prefrontal cortex
Regulates emotional behaviour
Found to have 11% reduction in the volume of grey matter in the prefrontal cortex of people with APD compared to to controls
MIRROR NEURONES
Criminals with APD can expeience empathy bur do more sporadically than others
Empathy is controlled by mirror neurons p
Only when criminals were asked to empathise did their mirror neurones activate
APD individuals may have a neural switch that can be turned on or off
Evaluations of genetic explanation of criminality
Problem with twin studies
Lances research were poorly controlled and judgments related to if twins were DZ or MZ were based on apperance rather than DNA testing
Lack validity
Twin studies are small sample sizes and unusual sample that may not represent the rest of the population
Most twins are reared in the same environment is a confounding variable are concordance rates may be due to having a shared learning experience rather than genetics