Forum Selection: PJ!!! Flashcards

Often Tested (16 cards)

1
Q

PJ Defintion

A

Court’s power over the parties. Does the D have sufficient contacts with the forum state so that the exercise of PJ is fair and reasonable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

P’s PJ?

A

P filing is consent for PJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Two-Step Analysis!!

A

1: PJ must fall within state statute and 2: PJ must satisfy Constitution’s Due Process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Difference in analysis whether the case is in federal or state court?

A

No, a federal court would decide whether it has PJ over a D in exactly the same way as a state court would, the federal court would use the forum state’s long arm statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Applying the 2 step analysis!!!!

A

1: Apply forum state’s long arm statute, 2: ask Does the D have such minimum contacts with the forum so jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Constitutional Analysis Q & factors assessed to A

A

Q: Does the D have such minimum contacts with the forum so jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice? Factors: contact, relatedness, and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Const. Analysis: Contact

A

Must be relevant minimum contacts between the D and the forum state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Const. Analysis: Contact - Purposeful Availment

A

Voluntary act that the D must reach out to the forum and the contact must result from their targeting of the forum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Const. Analysis: Contact - Foreseeability

A

Is it foreseeable that D could be sued in the forum?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Const. Analysis: Relatedness

A

Does P’s claim arise from or relate to D’s contact with the forum?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Const. Analysis: Relatedness - A: Yes

A

Specific PJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Const. Analysis: Relatedness - A: No, general PJ

A

D either must be at home in the forum or must have registered to do business in the state and have appointed an agent for service of due process there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Const. Analysis: Relatedness - General PJ: Human

A

Where D is domiciled or where D is served with process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Const. Analysis: Relatedness - General PJ: Corporation

A

The state in which it is incorporated and the state in which it has its principal place of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fairness (specific PJ only)

A

burden/convenience on D and witnesses; state’s interest, the forum state may want to provide a courtroom for its citizens who are allegedly being harmed by out-of-state Ds; P’s interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Constitutional Test Summary for PJ

A

1: Contact - purposeful availment and foreseeability; 2: Relatedness - arise out of and relate to the contacts with the forum; 3: Fairness (specific PJ only) - burden/convenience, state’s interest, and P’s interest