Fossil evidence for human evolution Flashcards
(31 cards)
Front
Back
How many species of Australopithecus existed around 2 million years ago in southern Africa?
Species of Australopithecus around 2 million years ago include Australopithecus afarensis, A. africanus, and A. sediba. A. afarensis, known for ‘Lucy,’ existed from 3.9 to 3.2 million years ago. A. africanus, with a larger brain, existed from 3.5 to 2.0 million years ago. A. sediba, found in South Africa, was transitional with a mix of features from Homo and Australopithecus.
What evidence supports the existence of multiple species of Australopithecus?
Fossil evidence, including skeletal remains and footprints, shows differences in size, brain capacity, and morphology, supporting the idea of multiple species coexisting in Southern Africa, such as A. afarensis, A. africanus, and A. garhi.
Would a group of adult Neanderthals still living in Europe be considered a separate species from Homo sapiens?
Yes, Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) are considered a separate species due to distinct cranial features like large brow ridges, occipital bun, and a robust body adapted for cold climates. Genetic evidence, however, shows interbreeding with Homo sapiens.
What are the cranial characteristics of Homo neanderthalensis?
Neanderthals had a large cranial capacity (1200-1750cc), large double-arched brow ridges, and mid-facial prognathism. Their facial structure was robust with wide nostrils for thermoregulation, and they had no chin.
What are the key postcranial adaptations of Neanderthals?
Neanderthals were stocky and muscular, with broad chests and robust arms, indicative of strength. Their postcranial skeleton was adapted for cold climates, with short limbs (Bergmann’s Rule) and a compact body.
How does the fossil and archaeological record reconstruct the evolutionary history of Homo sapiens?
Fossil evidence from sites like Herto (Ethiopia) and Qafzeh (Israel) shows early Homo sapiens with modern cranial features. Archaeological evidence, such as tool use and burial practices, further informs us of their cognitive abilities and social structures.
What challenges are associated with using the fossil record to reconstruct human evolution?
The fossil record is incomplete, with many gaps. Fossils often lack soft tissue and can be fragmented, making it difficult to accurately interpret species relationships and behaviors.
What is the Out of Africa hypothesis for the origin of Homo sapiens?
The Out of Africa hypothesis suggests that Homo sapiens evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago and then migrated out, replacing other hominin species such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus. Fossil and mitochondrial DNA support this model.
What is the Multiregional hypothesis for the origin of Homo sapiens?
The Multiregional hypothesis proposes that Homo sapiens evolved simultaneously in different regions of the world, with gene flow preventing speciation between regional populations. Fossil evidence from different regions suggests local adaptation and continuity.
What evidence supports the Out of Africa model?
Fossil evidence from Herto, Ethiopia, and mitochondrial DNA studies showing the greatest genetic diversity in African populations support the Out of Africa model. The earliest Homo sapiens fossils are found exclusively in Africa.
What are the main differences between Homo habilis and Homo erectus?
Homo habilis had a smaller brain (500-700cc) and was more ape-like in postcranial anatomy. Homo erectus, on the other hand, had a larger brain (800-1200cc), a more modern postcranial anatomy, and was the first hominin to leave Africa.
What is Homo naledi, and how does it contribute to understanding human evolution?
Homo naledi is a small-brained hominin (500cc) found in South Africa. It had a mix of primitive features, such as a curved pelvis, and more modern traits like long legs, showing complex behaviors possibly linked to ritualistic burial.
How does the use of fire and stone tools relate to Homo erectus?
Homo erectus is associated with the Acheulean tool tradition and the use of fire. The larger brain size and evidence of meat consumption may be linked to increased nutrient intake from cooked food.
How did Neanderthals adapt to cold climates?
Neanderthals were stocky and muscular with a large nose to warm cold air. Their short limbs and robust body were likely an adaptation to conserve heat in cold environments (Bergmann’s and Allen’s Rules).
What is the evidence for Neanderthal cannibalism?
Cannibalism in Neanderthals is suggested by cut marks found on bones, which may indicate ritual defleshing or butchery. Evidence from sites like Goyet (Belgium) suggests they may have eaten other Neanderthals.
What is the significance of the Laetoli footprints?
The Laetoli footprints, made by Australopithecus afarensis, provide evidence for bipedal locomotion 3.5 million years ago. They show a human-like stride with a longitudinal arch and a big toe in line with the others.
How does the fossil record inform us about early human diets?
Fossil evidence, including tooth wear patterns and cut marks on bones, suggests early hominins like Australopithecus gahri and Homo habilis engaged in meat consumption, likely scavenging rather than hunting.
What is the role of mitochondrial DNA in human evolutionary studies?
Mitochondrial DNA is passed maternally and shows the greatest variation in African populations, supporting the Out of Africa hypothesis. It helps trace the origins and migration patterns of early Homo sapiens.
What is Homo floresiensis, and what is its significance?
Homo floresiensis, also known as ‘the Hobbit,’ was a small hominin with a cranial capacity of 400cc. It likely evolved from Homo erectus but was geographically isolated on the island of Flores, Indonesia, showing unique evolutionary traits.
What are the key characteristics of Homo heidelbergensis?
Homo heidelbergensis had a larger brain (1200-1500cc) and features like a large brow ridge. They are believed to be ancestors of both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens and show evidence of using tools and hunting.
How did Homo sapiens differ from Neanderthals in their tool use?
Homo sapiens used more advanced tools like the Aurignacian blade technology, while Neanderthals primarily used Mousterian tools. The difference in tool complexity may be linked to cognitive differences.
What evidence suggests interbreeding between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals?
Genetic evidence, including nuclear DNA from Neanderthal specimens, shows that non-African populations today have 1-4% Neanderthal ancestry, suggesting interbreeding between the species.
How does Homo sapiens differ in its social structure from Neanderthals?
Homo sapiens are believed to have developed more complex social structures, possibly due to more advanced language and communication, which is reflected in the archaeological record of symbolic art and burial practices.