Foundational Issues Flashcards
(36 cards)
Crime
- The person causes a social harm
- The social harm is due to morally blameworthy behavior.
- As a result, apart from other consequences, the defendant is morally condemned by the community
Utilitarianism
People are punished if, and only if, it is expected to cause a reduction in crime that would otherwise occur.
Utilitarianism
General Deterence
The goal of punishment is to stop other potential crinimals from committing crimes.
Utilitarianism
Individual Deterence
The goal of punishment is to deter an offender from committing a crime again.
Also known as specific deterence.
Utilitarianism
Incapacitation
The goal of punishment is to imprison the defender so he cannot commit further crimes.
Utilitarianism
Rehabilitation
The goal of punishment is to change the offender so he won’t commit crimes when he is released.
Retribution
The offender deserves to be punished for his crime.
Assaultive Retribution
The theory is that because the offender hurt society, it is right for society to hurt him back.
Also known as public vengeance or societal retribution.
Protective Retribution
Punishment is meant to restore the moral balance of society. Society has rules and if a person breaks the rules and is not punished for it, he enjoys the benefits of society without carrying the burden of following the rules.
Victim Vindication
Punishment is a way to right a wrong.
Denunciation
Punishment is justified as a way to express society’s condemnation and the relative seriousness of a crime.
Common Law in Statutes
If a term is not defined in a statute, it’s presumed to retain its common law meaning.
Felony
An offense punishable by death or imprisonment in a state prison
Misdemeanor
An offense for which the maximum punishment is a fine, local jail time, or both
Reception Statutes
Common law crimes that are not in the penal code but can still be punished.
Punishment
Punishment is suffered only when an agent of the government is granted authority by the criminal conviction to inflict pain or otherwise cause consequences ordinarily considered unpleasent.
People v. Suite
Suitte had an unregistered gun but was a good guy. NY had a minimal one-year jail requirement meant to produce general deterrence. Judge used his discretion and sentenced Suitte to 30 days in jail.
Rule – Appellate courts defer to trial courts unless there’s an abuse of discretion
Just and Proper Sentences Consider
- The purpose of punishment
- The crime and
- The nature of the defendant.
Principle of Legality
A person may not be punished unless her conduct was defined as criminal before she acted
Policies Behind Legality
- Criminal statutes should be understandable to the average person
- Criminal statutes shouldn’t leave policy matters to policemen, judges and juries to decide on an ad hoc, subjective basis
- Judicial interpretation of ambiguous statutes should be construded in favor of the accused
Constitutional Law
Article I, Section 9
Prohibits bills of attainder, special legislation that declares a person guilty of a crime and subject to punishment without a trial.
Constitutiional Law
Article 1, Section 10
Prohibits people from being prosecuted for current crimes that were not crimes when the people did them.
This rule is for the legislature, not the judiciary. A court may interpret common law doctrines with retroactive effect unless the interpretation is unexpected or indefensible.
Constitutional Law
Amendments V & IX
- Provide for equal protection and due process under the law.
- Prohibits arbitrary criminalization
- Prohibits vague laws
- Prohibits laws that deny substantive due process
- Prohibits discriminatory criminalization
Constitutional Law
Amendment VIII
Prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
- Punishments offensive to human dignity
- Excessive punishments
- Punishments that have no relationship to the purpose of punishment
- Punishments that are grossly disproportionate to crime.
Rule of Lenity
When a criminal statute is subject to conflicting reasonable interpretations, the statute should be interpreted in favor of the defendant.
This is the very last tool of judicial interpretation. Not recognized by the MPC.