FR Flashcards
Asset criteria
ASPE 1000.25
Definition of Asset:
- Future benefit
- Entity can control the benefit
- Event that caused benefit already occurred
Accounting for subsidiaries
ASPE 1591, ASPE 3051
An enterprise can MAKE AN ACCOUNTING POLICY CHOICE to account for its subsidiaries using one of the following methods:
- > cost method
- > equity method
- > consolidation method
Once the method is selected, it must be applied consistently (I.e all subs must be accounted for using the same method)
Financial instruments
ASPE 3856.16-19
- financial instruments tested for impairment at the end of each reporting period
- > where impairment exists, reduce CV to highest of :
- > PV of C/F expected from holding the asset
- > NRV (if asset is sold)
- > amt entity expects to realize from exercising its right to collateral
- > where impairment exists, reduce CV to highest of :
- impairment can be reversed IF asset subsequently recovers in value
Accounts Receivable
ASPE 3856.05(h),16, 17
- a financial instrument -> a CONTRACTUAL right to receive cash or financial asset from another party
- therefore, IMPAIRMENT testing is needed at the end of reporting period IF there are significant adverse changes during the period that cast DOUBT on collectibility
- if impaired - written down to the amount EXPECTED to be collected through use of an ALLOWANCE account
- same amount recorded in BD expense
DR bad debt expense
CR allowance for doubtful accounts
Inventory costs
ASPE 3031.11, 12, 17
- the cost of inventories shall be comprised of purchase,conversion costs,costs to bring to present location and condition
- trade discounts, rebates, and other similar items are deducted in determining the cost of purchase (netted against total cost)
EXCLUSION:
- storage, admin OH, selling costs(commissions)
Inventory Valuation
ASPE 3031.07, 10-12,29
- inventories shall be measured at LOWER of NRV and cost
- Cost = purchase, cost of conversion and costs incurred to bring to present location and condition
- NRV = estimate selling price in ordinary course of business less estimated selling costs
- estimates of NRV are based on the most reliable evidence available, at the time the estimates are made, of the amount the inventories are expected to realize upon sale
Internally Generated Intangible Assets- R&D
ASPE 3064.37,40,41
-research costs = expensed when incurred
Development costs:
- accounting policy CHOICE to either capitalize or expense
- capitalize when ALL 6 criteria are met:
A) technically feasible
B) intention to complete it
C) ability to use or sell it
D) availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development
E) ability to reliably measure the expenditures attributed
F) probable future economic benefits will be generated
Investments
ASPE 3051 and ASPE 3856.11-15
- investments subject to significant influence can be accounted for using EQUITY or COST method
- investment WITHOUT significant influence:
- not quoted on an active mkt- COST mthd
- quoted on active mkt - Accounted @FV
Revenue Recognition criteria (ASPE
Revenue from sales and service transactions shall be recognized when:
- Performance is complete (risk and rewards transferred, significant acts performed, no continuing managerial involvement)
- Consideration is measurable
- Collection reasonably assured
Goodwill and intangible assets -Amortization
ASPE 3064.56,57,61
-intangible assets are amortized over the estimated useful life UNLESS they are considered to have an indefinite life
- assets with indefinite life are not to be amortized until the life is no longer considered indefinite ( however it must still be tested for impairment)
- amortization method and useful life should be reviewed annually
- the expected useful life must consider:
A) expected use of the asset
B) expected useful life of related asset
C) contractual, legal and regulatory provisions and other economic factors
Revenue recognition criteria
ASPE 3400.17
% method of completion
- performance consists of the execution of more than one act, and
- revenue would be recognized proportionately by reference to the performance of each act
For practical purposes, when services are provided by an indeterminate number of acts over a specific period of time, revenue would be recognized on a STRAIGHT LINE BASIS over the period unless there is evidence that some other method better reflects the pattern of performance
The amt of work accomplished would be assessed by reference to measures of performance that are reasonably determinable and relate as directly as possible to the activities critical to the completion of the contract.
Revenue recognition criteriaASPE 3490.18
Completed contract method would be appropriate when performance consists of the execution of A SINGLE ACT or when the enterprise cannot REASONABLY EST the extent of PROGRESS toward completion
Not the same rev Rec criteria under IFRS
Revenue Recognition - Consignment Sales
ASPE 3400.13-15
- Consignment sales include goods shipped but not yet billed
- They could be returned if not sold or only billed for to the extent sold
- Performance is not considered complete upon delivery for goods, as the RISKS AND REWARDS are deemed not to have been transferred from the seller to the buyer because the seller’s continuing involvement
THEREFORE,
Revenue CANNOT be recognized up until either the goods can no longer be RETURNED or a PAYMENT is made in regards to them
Revenue Recognition - Effects of UNCERTAINTIES
ASPE 3400.19-21
Recognition of revenue requires that the revenue is MEASURABLE and that ULTIMATE COLLECTION is reasonably assured.
- > if significant and unpredictable amounts of goods being returned = >DO NOT recognize revenue
- > if the amt of returns CAN BE REASONABLY ESTIMATED based upon experience, it may be possible to provide for an ALLOWANCE FOR A RETURNS expense.
PPE - Betterment
ASPE 3061.14
- a “betterment” enhances service potential (increase in physical output or service capacity, associated, operating costs are lowered, useful life is extended, or quality of output improved)
CLASSIFICATION:
CAPITALIZE = betterment
Expense to R&M = not betterment
Non-Monetary Transactions
ASPE 3931.06,07.11
Measurement:
- measured at the more RELIABLY of FV of asset GIVEN UP and FV of assets RECEIVED, unless the transactions lacks COMMERCIAL SUBSTANCE or neither the FV of the asset received nor the FV of the asset given up is reliably measurable, in which case, it should be measured at the CV of the asset given up
COMMERCIAL SUBSTANCE:
- when the entity’s future C/F are expected to change significantly as a result of the transaction
- > the risk, timing and amt of the future C/F of the asset received differ significantly from the risk, timing and amt of the C/F of the asset given up; OR
- > the entity-specific value of the asset received differs from the entity-specific value of the asset given up, and the difference is significant relative to the FV of the assets exchanged
PPE - Costs
ASPE 3061.03.06.08
COSTS:
- amount of consideration given up to acquire, construct, develop or better a PPE
- DIRECT Costs attributable include:
- > acquisition
- > construction, development or betterment (DM, DL, OH or carrying costs)
- > installing @ location
- > in the condition necessary for intended use
BASKET PURCHASE:
- cost of each item of PPE acquired in a group of assets for a single amount is determined by ALLOCATING the price paid to each items in the basket based on FV @ time of acquisition
Non-Monetary transactions
IAS 16.24-26
SAME AS ASPE
MEASUREMENT:
- measured @ the more reliably measurable of the FV of the asset given up and the FV of the asset received, UNLESS the transaction lacks COMMERCIAL SUBSTANCE or neither the FV of the asset received or FV of asset given up is RELIABLY measurable, in which, it should be measured at the CV of the asset GIVEN UP
COMMERCIAL SUBSTANCE
- when the entity’s C/F are expected to change significantly as a result of the transaction
- > the risk, timing and amt of the future C/F of the asset received differ significantly from the risk, timing and amt of the C/F of the asset given up OR
- > the entity-specific value of the asset received differs from the entity-specific value of the asset given up, and the difference is significant relative to the FV of the assets exchanged
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
ASPE 3063.04-09, 12, 18
STEPS:
- Determine if FACTORS indicate impairment exists - internal and external indicators
- Group asset with other assets/liabilities to form group at the lowest level that generates G/S (CGUs)
- Determine if there is impairment by comparing NBV to Recoverable amt (undiscounted C/F)
- Calculate impairment by comparing carrying amount to FV
CANNOT reverse write-downs
Impairment of Assets
IAS 36
- Required to assess whether there are any indicators of impairment @ the end of each reporting period; test when indicators of impairment exists
TEST impairment:
- compare the asset’s recoverable amt to the CV; CV > Recoverable amt = impairment loss
Recoverable amount: Higher of: (FV - costs to sell) and (value in use)
FV - cost to sell -> price that WOULD HAVE RECEIVED TO SELL an asset or paid to transfer a liability between mkt participants LESS INCREMENTAL COSTS directly attributable to the disposal of the asset (excluding fiancé cost and income tax expense)
Value in Use -> PV of future C/F from the continuing use of the asset and its ultimate disposal
- Impairment CAN BE REVERSED if the asset subsequently recovers in value, but not more than the value of impairment recognized
Investments - Equity Method
IAS 28
- An entity with SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE over an invested shall treat the invested as an ASSOCIATE and account for its investment in the associate using the equity method
- SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE can be demonstrated by owning (directly or indirectly) 20% or more of the voting power of the invested
- The entity may be able to demo influence, even with < 20% ownership. Evidence of influence can include:
- > representation on the BOD
- > Participation in policy-making processes
- > material transactions between the entity and its invested
- > provision of essential technical info
Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognized @ cost, and is adjusted for the post-acquisition change in the investor’s share of the investee’s net assets
Capital lease criteria - Lessee
ASPE 3065.06
Capital Lease
Must meet ONE of the criteria:
- > transfer of ownership or BPO @ end of the lease term
- > Lease term > 75% of ECONOMIC LIFE of asset
- > PV of min lease pmts > 90% of FV lease asset
- > Discount rate = lower of lessee’s incremental borrowing rate and implicit rate
Lease inducement
ASPE 3065.27
- lease inducements are an inseparable part of the agreement and, accordingly, are accounted for as reductions of the lease expense over the term of the lease.
Capital Lease Criteria - LESSOR
ASPE 3065.07
Capital lease for LESSOR if ALL of the following exist:
- credit risk is normal
- unreimbursable costs are estimable
- any one of the following criteria are met:
- > transfer of ownership or BPO @ end of lease term
- > lease term > 75% of economic life
- > PV of min lease pmts > 90% of FV of leased asset
- Discount rate - Implicit rate
Types of Capital Lease - LESSOR
ASPE 3065.29, 30, 27
Sales-type lease
- > arise when a dealer uses leasing as a way to sell their products
- > record as sale
Direct financing lease
- > @ inception, FV of the leased property = to its CV
- > Usually arises when a lessor acts as intermediary b/w manufacturer and lessee
- > record as lease receivables (punt to be received and guaranteed residual value, if any)
- > diff b/w lease receivable and CV should be recorded as unearned finance income
- > finance income will be recognized each year
Lease Accounting - Land & Building (ASPE)
When a lease contains both land and building, it must first be determined whether the terms allow ownership to pass or provide for a BPO
If YES - the lessee will capitalize the land separately from building, based upon FV
If NO - is the FV of the land at the inception of the lease SIGNIFICANT in relation to the total FV of the leased property?
If YES - the land and building(S) are considered separately for purposes of classification. The lessee and lessor allocate the min lease payments between the land and building(S) in proportion to their FV. Both parties classify the portion of the lease applicable to land as an OPERATING LEASE
If NO - the land and building are considered a single unit, and the economic life of the building is considered the economic life of the unit.