Free Will Flashcards
(32 cards)
Define Determinism
the theory that the future is determined by the past, at least to a certain extent
What would be true in a deterministic world?
- we still make our own choices, but depending on the past we are determined to make one particular choice and
- future is limited based on circumstances based on the past
Define free will
- It is up to us and only us to choose our actions
- in any case scenario, we have the freedom to choose whatever we like, and we could have done other than the choices we made in the past
What is the problem with free will and determinsim?
- If determinism is true, then the future is not open, nor do we have true power over it
- because of our past, only one future is open to us, whatever we choose could not have been otherwise, therefore no free will
Define compatabilism
Free will can exist at the same time as determinism
Define incompatabilism
Free will and determinism cannot exist at the same time
Define Fatalism
The belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inescpabale
Define hard determinism
- the future is causally determined by the past, and causal determinism is incompatible with free will, therefore free will does not exist
- free will requires absolute control over the future. We do not have this
What is causal determinism?
- the past causes the future, and this causal link determines the future
- the cause of an event must happen prior to the event
- causes are sufficient conditions for bringing about their effects
Why does causal determinism strengthen the argument for hard determinism?
- causal determinism suggests that all events are determined by prior events, but if all events are causally determined, we have no control over what happens, therefore no free will
What is the principle of sufficient reason?
- the claim that anything that happens does so for a definite reason
- poses serious issue against free will
What is an example of the principle of sufficient reason?
If a tree falls over, there must have been something that caused it to be knocked down, such as strong winds or a strike of lightning
Why are consequences for responsibility a problem for hard determinism
- we do hold each other morally responsible for our actions
- if hard determinism is true, however, then everything we do is determined by the past, we could not have done otherwise
- therefore how can we praise or blame anyone for what they do?
What was Galen Strawson’s basic argument?
- we do what we do because of our character
- we are not truly responsible for developing our character (education, parents, external circumstances)
Therefore: we are not fully responsible for what we do
Define indeterminism
- the belief that the future is not fixed by the past
- challenges the notion that all events are causally determined by prior events
- the same past can lead to different futures
What may support the idea of indeterminsim?
- supported by recent discoveries in physics
What are the main problems that indeterminism faces?
- suggests that actions are random events, however no one should be held responsible for something that happens randomly
- in order to be genuinely free, we need complete control over our actions, if actions are random we cannot have this
- turns our actions into unpredictable and uncontrollable events
In the compatibilist view, what is freedom of action vs freedom of the will?
- Because compatibilists still hold determinism as true they still believe that events, including our desires/choices/actions are causally determined
- however we are free when we are free to act on these desires, even if said desires were causally determined
- we can have freedom of action without freedom of the will
Define traditional compatabilism
- all actions are causally determined
- but, we are free when we can do what we want without constraint by outside forces
- views “could have done otherwise” hypotheticaly
What is a major problem with traditional compatibilism?
- some of our desires are not identical with our will
- do not align with what we truly want because some desires may be imposed on us
- therefore calls upon deep self compatabilism
Define deep self compatabilism - Harry G. Frankfurt
- we are free as long as we act on our authentic desires
What are authentic desires?
- desires we truly wish to act
- dependent on what happens inside us
- desires imposed on us by outside forces are inauthentic and, therefore not of free will
What are the major problems for compatibilism
- determinism and free will may not be compatible, as the existence of determinism would make it impossible to hold people responsible for their actions
What is Peter van Inwagen’s consequence argument?
- No one has power over the past and nature’s laws
- our actions are the necessary consequences of the past and the laws of nature
- if we have no power over X, we have no power over the future necessary consequences of X
Therefore: - We have no power over our future actions
- In order to be responsible for our future actions, we must have power over our future actions
Therefore: - we are not responsible for our future actions