Functional Analysis I Flashcards

(114 cards)

1
Q

Define dense and nowhere dense

A

pg. 6, Beispiel 1.2.1 vi)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Prove Satz: M metric space. U open in M, A=M\U. TFAE:

i) U is open and dense
ii) A is closed and nowhere dense

A

Satz 1.2.1 , pg. 6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Characterize closure in metric space

A

closure(A)={x limit point of xn in A}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Cauchy sequence

A

(xk)k Cauchy in metric space M if d(xk,xl)–>0.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define completeness

A

A metric space M is complete if every Cauchy sequence in M converges in M.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define meager, non-meager, residual sets and the Baire categories.
Give an example of a meager set.
What are subsets and/or unions of meager sets?

A

Def 1.3.1, pg. 9

Beispiel 1.3.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State Baire’s theorem,

Prove for 3+

A

Satz 1.3.2, pg. 9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can Lebesgue-Nullsets and meager sets be characterized?

A

No, there is example of either not being the other. For an example of a non-meager nullset give Beispiel 1.3.3, pg 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

State the “principle of uniform boundedness”.

For 5. give its proof

A

Satz 1.4.3, pg 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Banach space

Define Hilbert space

A

A Banach space is a normed space, which is complete w.r.t. the metric induced by the norm.
A Hilbert space is an inner product space, which is also a complete metric space w.r.t. the metric induced by the norm induced by the inner product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is B(M,X) and when is it complete? Prove it

A

Bsp. 2.1.1 i), pg. 15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define isometry.

A

(M,d),(M,d) metric spaces. T:M–>M* is an isometry if d*(T(x),T(y))=d(x,y) for all x,y in M.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define equivalence of norms.

A

|.|_1 and |.|_2 are equivalent iff there is a constant C>0 s.t. for every x in X: |x|_1 / C =< |x|_2 =< C * |x|_1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give a sufficient condition for two norms to be equivalent?

5: Prove it

A

The two norms are defined on a finite dimensional R(/or C)-vector space.
Satz 2.1.2, pg. 18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What can we say about finite dimensional subspaces of normed vector spaces?
5: Prove it

A

They are complete, closed and all norms are equivalent. (satz 2.1.3, pg 18)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of a subspace of a complete subspace, which is neither closed nor Cauchy.

A

Consider C^0([0,2]) as a subspace of L^1([0,2]) with the L^1 norm. Then (fn)n where fn(t):=t^n for t in [0,1) and else fn(t):=1 is Cauchy in L^1 but its limit is not in the subspace C^0. (beispiel 2.1.3, pg 19)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Characterize compact (metric spaces) in metric spaces.

A

K s.s.o. M is (sequentially) compact if every sequence has a convergent subsequence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
Characterize finite dimensional normed vector spaces.
For 5 (one direction): prove
A

A normed vector space is finite dimensional iff its unit sphere is compact. (satz 2.1.4, pg 19)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Characterize linear continuous functions:

Prove: 4+

A

i) A is continuous in 0 in X.
ii) A is continuous everywhere.
iii) A is uniformly continuous.
iv) A is Lipschitz continuous.
v) A’s operator norm is finite (well-defined).
satz 2.2.1, pg 21

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a sufficient condition for a linear function to be continuous?
Give an example of a linear non-contin function
Prove for 3

A

X finite-dimensional. Prove Lipschitz contin, Satz 2.2.2, pg. 21
Counter example: X=Y=C^0([0,1]), A=id, where we equip X with L^1 norm and Y with C^0 norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When is L(X,Y) a Banach space?

Proof: 5+

A

L(X,Y) is a Banach space, if Y is. Satz 2.2.4, pg 22.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define the Spektralradius. Set it in relation to the operator norm.
Prove for 5+

A

Satz 2.2.6, pg 24

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is the Neumann series of an operator and when is it well-defined, what is is equal to then?

A

Satz 2.2.7, pg 24

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What can we say about Gl(X) topologically when a certain ?

condition (which?) is fulfilled? Prove for 4

A

When X is Banach, Gl(X) is open in L(X).

Satz 2.2.8, pg 25

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Given X,Y can we define a normed space (X/Y,||..||_X/Y)? Is it Banach`?
Satz 2.3.1, pg. 25
26
Define scalar product
def 2.4.1 pg 27
27
Prove Cauchy Schwarz
WLOG |x|=|y|=1. Let t=conj(x,y) and note (x,y-tx)=0. | Now 1=|y|^2=|tx+(y-tx)|^2=|t|^2*|x|^2+|y-tx|^2>=|t|^2=|(x,y)|^2.
28
What can we say about orth(Y)=Y^? Prove it.
``` lemma 2.4.2, pg. 28, And more or less: lemma 2.4.3, pg. 28, Korollar 2.4.1, pg 29, satz 2.4.1, pg. 29: X=Y⊕Y^⊥ + inclusions and Lemma 2.4.4, pg 29 ```
29
State the Banach-Steinhaus Theorem. | Prove for 3.
Satz 3.1.1, pg. 31
30
Show L(X,Y) is closed if X is complete.
Anwendung 3.1.1, pg. 32, (von Banach Steinhaus)
31
Define open operator and state the Open Mapping Theorem.
Def 3.2.1, Satz 3.2.1 pg. 32
32
Define closed operator.
(Not definition from topology!) X,Y normed spaces. D(A) s.s.o. X lin subspace. A:D(A)-->Y linear is a closed if its graph Gamma_A={(x,Ax); x in D(A)} is closed in XxY (for example w.r.t. the norm: |(x,y)|:=|x|+|y|) (Def 3.3.1, pg. 35) (Note if D(A)=X and A in L(X,Y), then A is a closed operator. Pf: (xk,yk), then xk->x => yk=Axk->y=Ax since A contin and (x,y)=(x,Ax) in graph)
33
Show harder direction of Closed Graph Theorem. | Reformulate following bem.
X,Y Banach, A:X-->Y linear. Then: A in L(X,Y) if and only if A is a closed operator. (Note: D(A)=X. Counter example when fails due to this X=C^0([0,1]), A=d/dt on C^1([0,1])) Satz 3.3.1, pg. 35
34
State the Theorem of the Continuous Inverse | Which proof is its proof analogous to?
Satz 3.3.2, pg 37 | anal to satz 3.3.1 closed mapping thm
35
Define linear graph.
Let X,Y be normed vector spaces and Gamma a linear subspace of XxY. Gamma is called a linear graph, if (x,y1),(x,y2) in Gamma implies that y1=y2. Or equivalently if (0,y) in Gamma implies y=0. See Bem. 3.4.1 for the relation between the graph and linear operator.
36
Define extension and closable operator.
Def 3.4.2, pg 38
37
Prove A is closable iff ((xk,yk)) s.s.o. Gamma_A: | If xk-->0 and yk=Axk, then y=0.
A is closable iff clos(Gamma_A) is a linear graph and that is the case iff (0,y) in clos(Gamma_A) implies y=0. Satz 3.4.1, pg 38
38
Prove that a linear and contin operator is closable
(xk,yk=A=xk) in Graph_A s.t. xk-->0. Since A contin, |Axk|=0
39
Is A=d/dt closable? | Prove for 5+
We showed that any differential operator: | A: C^inf_c(Omega) s.s.o. L^p(Omega)-->L^p(Omega) is closable for any p in [1,inf].
40
State the Lemma for the Calculus of Variations ("Fundamentallemma der Variationsrechnung"). For 4: prove it
Satz 3.4.3, pg. 40
41
Define sublinear.
X R-VS. p:X-->R sublinear if 1) p(a*x)=a*p(x) for all x in X and a \geq 0, 2) p(x+y) \leq p(x) + p(y) Def 4.1.1, pg 43
42
State Hellinger-Töplitz | Prove for 4+
Beispiel 3.3.2, pg. 36
43
State the Hahn-Banach thm. | Sketch its proof for 3+
Satz 4.1.1, pg 43
44
Define C-sublinear | Additional property that R-sublin doesnt have? (that follows)
def. 4.1.2, pg 45, p>=0
45
Reformulate Hahn-Banach for C-vector spaces
Satz 4.1.2, pg 45
46
State and prove the theorem of "dominated extension" ("Dominierte Fortsetzung")
Satz 4.1.3, pg 46
47
Define dualspace
(X,||.||) normed VS. X*:=L(X,R) dualspace of X.
48
For every x in X there is an x* in X*, s.t. ??? | Prove for 3+
s.t. x*(x)==||x*||^2=||x||^2 (satz 4.2.1, pg 46)
49
For all x in X: sup{ |(x*,x)| : ||x*|| =< 1}=? | For all x* in X*: sup{ |(x*,x)| : ||x|| =< 1}=?
=||x|| =||x*|| i.e. takes the supremum Satz 4.2.2, pg 47
50
Let x != y in X then ? | Prove for 2+
there is an l in X* s.t. l(x) != l(y) | Satz 4.2.3, pg 47
51
Satz: Let M s.s.o X be a closed linear subspace s.t. M != X, and let x0 in X\M with d=dist(x0,M):=...? Then...? Prove for 5+
Satz 4.2.4, pg 47
52
Define annihilator
def 4.2.2, page 48
53
Define j_y and J | What properties do they have?
pg 49, satz 4.3.1
54
State Riesz representation theorem (Rieszscher Darstellungssatz) State strategy of proof for 5+
satz 4.3.2, pg 49
55
State the Lax-Milgram theorem, | its corollary for 5+
satz 4.3.3, pg 51
56
What can we say about the dualspace of L^p under certain (which?) conditions of the measure space?
satz 4.4.1, lemma 4.4.1 and lemma 4.4.2 pg 53
57
State the separation theorem for convex sets
satz 4.5.1, pg 56
58
Define the Minkowski-Funktional
pg 57
59
define extremal subsets and points | give two contrasting examples in R^2
def 4.5.1, pg 58
60
What can we say about subsets of extremal subsets? Prove for 3+ State a set which is extremal in every compact set PRove for 4+
Lemma 4.5.1, pg 59 | Lemma 4.5.2, pg 59
61
State the Krein-Milman theorem (only pf for ii) for 5+)
satz 4.5.2 pg 59 and satz 4.5.3 pg 60
62
Define convex hull
def 4.5.2, pg 60
63
Define weakly convergent
definition 4.6.1, pg 60
64
If (xk)k converges weakly, what can we say about (xk)k? Prove for 5+ Hint: liminf |xk|?
satz 4.6.1, pg 61
65
Define weak topology How do the closed sets of the topology and the weak topology relate? How do weak convergence and the weak topology relate?
definition 4.6.2, pg 61 | lemma 4.6.1, pg 62
66
Define weakly sequentially closed
definition 4.6.3, pg 62
67
How do weakly closed, weakly sequentially closed and closed relate? Prove for 4+
weakly closed => w.s.c => closed | Lemma 4.6.2, pg 62
68
Give a counter example that disproves that closed does not imply weakly sequentially closed
the 1-sphere in l^2 is closed but according to beispiel 4.6.1 is not weakly sequentially closed (beispiel 4.6.2, pg 62)
69
What can we say about a convex set and the weak topology? | Pf for 4+
the weak closure is equal to the closure (satz 4.6.2, pg 62)
70
State Mazur's lemma
satz 4.6.3, pg 63
71
When are the weak and strong topology equivalent? | What do the sets Omega_{l,U} (i.e. the basis sets of the weak topology) contain when the condition is not satisfied?
when dimX
72
Define bidualspace
``` X**=(X*)*=L(X*,R) is the bidualspace of X. def 5.1.1., pg 65 ```
73
Define the canonical embedding of the dual space of a space into the space state the properties of this embedding
def 5.1.1., pg 65
74
``` Define reflexivity of a normed space State some examples and non examples 1 ex for 3, 3 ex for 4, 4 ex for 5 ```
definition 5.1.2, pg 65 | Another non example L^inf (beispiel 5.1.2, pg 67)
75
If X is reflexiv then X is also... | Proof for 3+
complete (bemerkung 5.1.1, pg 66), reflexive (Satz 5.1.2.)
76
Relate X and X* by reflexivity.
Satz 5.1.2, pg 66 i) X* ii) complete, reflexiv
77
Under what sufficient conditions is a subspace of a normed space reflexiv?
X is reflexiv, Y closed subspace of Y, then Y is also reflexiv. Satz 5.1.3, pg 67
78
Define separability (+characterization)
Note M is metric space: definition 5.2.1/bemerkung 5.2.1, pg 68
79
Under which conditions are subsets of _____ spaces are separable? Prove
Subsets of separable metric spaces are separable w.r.t. the induced metric Satz 5.2.1. pg 68
80
Relate dual spaces and separability | Prove 1 for 3, both for 4
Satz 5.2.2 (pg 68): X normed R vector space: i) X* separable, then X is separable ii) X separable and reflexiv, then X* is also separable
81
Define weakly convergent*
definition 5.3.1, pg 69
82
State the Banach-Alaoglu theorem | Proof for 4+
satz 5.3.1, pg 70
83
State the Eberlein-ˇSmulyan theorem | Prove for 3+
satz 5.3.2, pg 72
84
State the approximation theorem | Prove for 3+
Satz 5.3.3, pg 72
85
Define w.s.l.s.c. (weakly sequentially lower semi-continuous) "schwach folgen-unterhalb-stetig"
definition 5.4.1, pg 73
86
Define coercive
def 5.4.2, pg 74
87
State the variation principle (“Variationsprinzip”) | Prove for 3+
satz 5.4.1, page 74
88
Define dual operator
definition 6.1.1., pg 77
89
Relate an operator and its dual with an equation | Prove for 5+
||A||=||A*|| | Satz 6.1.1, page 77
90
What holds for densely defined dual operator's dual and "any" "extensions"? Pf for 5+
Satz: If A:D_A s.s.o. X --> Y densely defined. Then: i) A*:D_A* s.s.o. Y* --> X* is closed ii) A "s.s.o." B then B* "s.s.o." A* Satz 6.1.2, page 78
91
State Banach's closed range theorem
Satz 6.2.1, pg 79 | Wonder if I should add the next Satz and lemma?
92
Define compact operator
Definition 6.2.1, pg 80
93
What holds for cpt operators and weakly convergent sequences? Pf for 5?
T cpt in L(X) and xk-w->x in X, then Txk-->Tx (i.e. converges strongly in X) Lem 6.2.2, pg 80
94
State Arzéla-Ascoli
satz 6.3.1, pg 81
95
State the Fréchet-Kolmogorov theorem (if manageable)
satz 6.3.2, pg 82
96
Define adjoint operator
definition 6.4.1, pg 84
97
How to the dual operator and adjoint operator relate?
Bemerkung 6.4.1, pg 85
98
Define symmetric and self adjoint
definition 6.4.2, pg 85
99
Define resolvent set and spectrum
definition 6.5.1, pg 86
100
Define resolvent and describe how the resolvent and resolvent set relate. And give the topological properties of resolvent set and spectrum that it implies.
definition 6.5.2, pg 87 | satz 6.5.1
101
Do two resolvents commute (w.r.t. the same operator)?
Yes (satz 6.5.2, pg 87)
102
Define eigenvalue, eigenspace, point spectrum, continuous spectrum and restspectrum
definition 6.5.3, pg 88
103
How do the spectral radius, the spectrum and the resolvent set relate?
Satz 6.5.3, pg 89
104
Define umrundet, i.e. surrounds and "schar"
definition 6.5.4, pg 90
105
State the spectral (mapping) theorem, Pf for 4+, (Lemma 6.5.2 may be used)
Satz 6.5.4, pg 91
106
What hold for the point spectrum when A is symmetric? | Pf for 4+
The eigenvalues are real, i.e. the point spectrum is a subset of R (satz 6.6.1, pg 92)
107
Define weak derivative
definition 6.6.1, pg 92
108
Give characterizations of selfadjointness
Satz 6.6.2, pg 95
109
Define normal and unitary
definition 6.7.1, pg 96
110
What follows for the spectral radius of a normal operator on a Hilbert space?
satz 6.7.1, pg 98
111
State Baire's theorem on functions (long proof)
satz 1.4.1, pg 10
112
Prove that for K cpt in X, l in X*, lambda=min{ l(x) : x i n K}. Then K_lambda = {x in K : l(x)=lambda} is extremal in K
lemma 4.5.2, pg 59
113
Prove: a:H^2-->R bilin, cont. and f in H*. Then there is precisely one x in H s.t. a(x,y)=f(y) for all y in H and |x|=< || f ||/lambda.
korollar 4.3.1, page 52
114
Define and characterize topologically complemented subspaces V s.s.o. X. Prove why they are closed.
Exercise 3, sheet 4