Functionalism Flashcards

1
Q

how did functionalism come about

A

in trying to account for the problem of token token theory the explanation created a theory of function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the difference between the terms type and token

A

type is a generalized category -pain

token is a specific instance - infinite number of these

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the first attempt at identity theory called

A

type-token theory-for every TYPE of mental state there is a TOKEN brain state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

in account of the criticism of chauvinism what was the attempt to fix the identity theory

A

token-token theory- for every TOKEN mental state there is a TOKEN brain state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the problem with the Token-Token theory?

A

if jones and mary have the same belief.

if their mental configurations are token (specific and individual to them)

what is it that makes the belief the same?

if trying to eliminate the mental features, we cannot use mental terms to explain the commonality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the response to the problem of the token-token theory? and what does this response cause

A

two brain states are the same mental state (a shared belief) by the virtue of the role that the brain state plays in the overall system

this causes functionalism to emerge, this is no longer an identity theory but now a theory about how the brain configuration relates to other states in the organism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

for identity theory to be correct what was necessary according to Putnam

A
  1. one must specify the physical chemical state that any organism must be in, in order to feel [pain]. one such that any organism that is capable of feeling is able to feel
  2. it must NOT be possible of any organism to have that chemical brain state if they cant feel pain
  3. this HAS to be true of ALL psychological states
  4. if we can find JUST one mental psychological predicate that can apply to both a mammal and an octopus but differ in respect to their physical chemical states, then identity theory collapses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were Putnams brief objections to behaviourism

A
  1. there IS the translation problem
  2. Person A feels pain but does not behave, and Person B does not feel pain (for whatver reason, pain meds) but is still able to act in pain. (you can have one without the other)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what theory did Putnam subscribe to and what is the thesis of the theory

A

functionalism: a rejection of, and reaction to, the identity theory

a reductive theory of mind

thesis: Mental states are functional states/ relational states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

according to functionalism, mental states fulfill a _________

A

particular function within the organism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how does functionalism answer to the token identity problem

A

two different brain state tokens are tokens of the same type of mental state if and only if the two brain states have the same causal relations (have the same function–relating to input)

same belief does not = same configuration

same belief = same function

brain state does not matter, function does

brain state X and Y can = the same belief if they play the same role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

according to functionalism. functions do not cause beliefs there _______

A

is JUST the function

Belief=function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

mental state is just the ______ that it plays

A

function/ role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what must you NOT do when referring to mental states and functionalism

A

you must be careful NOT to claim that mental states are related to other states in the organism.

according to functionalism mental states are NOT related but ARE THE RELATIONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the three parts of the “system” (your body) according to functionalism

A
  1. There are particular __inputs__ to the system (body): vision, touch, and sensory inputs (also other beliefs, not entirely external)
  2. There are particular __outputs__ of the system (body): behaviours , reactions, observable and non, micro and macro
  3. There are states that relate ___inputs and outputs ___of the system (body), as well as relate to other states: brain states, neurological events, events of the nervous system…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What makes two brain states the same mental state according to

Type-token, token-token, and functionalism

A

Type-Token Identity Theorist: The same neurological configuration

Token-Token Identity Theorist: the problem causes a shift into functionalism.

Functionalist: Brain states that play the same role. Something that caused the same belief. The tendency for the same belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

according to functionalism the same belief=_______

A

same function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what did Putnam think about identity theory and correlation

A

there is no advantage to mind and brain being = to each other

you can say they are correlated, but it is too strong of a claim to say they are identical

believed that identity theorists are being too scientific, Descartes was being more cautious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what does “jones believes there is a cat on a mat” mean to a functionalist?

A

jones is in mental state X that is causallly related to other mental states… which produces some external behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fill in the blanks and name what is going on in this quote:

Jones is in some state ‘x’ that is _________________to other mental states, say, the perception of the cat on the mat (‘y’), along with the desire to feed the cat (‘w’), which is related to external stimuli such as light hitting Jones’ retina (‘e’), which then produces _______________that might include feeding the cat treats (‘a’)

A

Jones is in some state ‘x’ that is ________causally related _________to other mental states, say, the perception of the cat on the mat (‘y’), along with the desire to feed the cat (‘w’), which is related to external stimuli such as light hitting Jones’ retina (‘e’), which then produces ________some external behaviour ________that might include feeding the cat treats (‘a’)

conditional behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

define conditional behaviour

A

behaviour based on beliefs.
behaviour produced by mental stste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is the problem with the original conditioned behaviour example of jones believes the cat is on the mat

A

run into the incomplete translation issue again. using mental states to explain the mental states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

briefly explain black box behaviourism

A

a mental state goes in a behaviour comes out–no explination for what happens under the box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is the solution the functionalists propose to the incomplete translation problem

A

ramsey sentences

24
what is a ramsey sentence
a sentence made with topic neutral vocabulary. can use entirely physical language (Jones has ‘x’ and ‘x’ is ____caused___by ‘y’ and ‘e’, and ‘x’ together with ‘w’ causes action ‘a’)
25
Fill in the blank, what is this called: Jones has ‘x’ and ‘x’ is _________by ‘y’ and ‘e’, and ‘x’ together with ‘w’ causes action ‘a’
(Jones has ‘x’ and ‘x’ is ____caused___by ‘y’ and ‘e’, and ‘x’ together with ‘w’ causes action ‘a’) a ramsey sentece
26
if it _______ like a mind then it is a mind
functions
27
explain what it means to define things functionally
a coffee maker is a coffee maker because of how it functions--if it does not function then it is no longer a coffee maker things are defined by their functions
28
how is functionalism superior to bahaviourism and identity theory
B: avoids the pitfalls of incomplete translations I:aviods chauvinism and can explain that different species can have the same mental states
28
is functionalism superior to dualism
this is a misleading question. In functionalism the composition of the system is completely irrelevant the system could be physical or even dualist non-physical stuff the only thing that matters is the function. Are physicalist but are not restricted to it
29
according to functionalism is the mind a thing
no, it agrees with ryle, the mind is not a thing it is a shorthand for a bunch of things
30
what are the benifits of funtionalism
1. clear research program 2. clear way to tell if a particular creature has a mental state or capability to have a mental state 3. multipul realization
31
what is the first criticism of functionalism
the inverted qualia jones and smith see red and green as 'red" the qualia is differnt but the play the same functional role in the system they stand in relation to the inputs and outputs in the same way Fail to account for the qualia again, mental states can not just be funtions if they can be differnt
32
what is the second criticism of functionalism and who proposed it
NED block the Absent qualia If two systems are in the same func state they must be in the same mental state Once we have the mapping—according to functionalism—we could organize everyone in china to function the same as the human mind—functionalism could reproduce mental states— but there would be NO QUALIA Leaving out the mental—need more. There is nothing that It is LIKE to be in a mental state. Mental states do more than that, the thing about pain is NOT simply its function to the system—this Is an incomplete description
33
what is the knowledge argument
Mary is born and raised in a black and white room She learns ALL the PHYSICAL facts about being in some particular mental state (seeing red) there is nothing she doesn’t know about the physical facts of seeing. Mary is one day released from the black and white world she looks around and sees red for the very first time. JACKSONS QUESTION AND ANSWER: DID MARY LEARN ANYTHING WHEN SHE SAW RED FOR THE FIRST TIME? OF COURSE SHE DID. What does this prove— if she learned something then she didn't know everything there is to know just from knowing the physical facts
33
what is the goal of "what mary didnt know" and who wrote it
ANY theory (all variations of physicalism) that depicts the world as entirely physical is false Frank Jackson
34
how does the knowledge argument prove dualism
Knowing ALL physical information is not all knowledge—there IS non physical if there is more for her to learn from seeing red. Physical knowledge is not all of the knowledge Physical facts do not exhaust everything there is to know.
35
how did paul churchland reword the knowledge argument
Mary knows evething there is to know about brain states and their properties (description) It is not the case that Mary knows everything there is to know about sensations and their properties (acquaintance) Therefore sensations and their properties do not equal brain states and their properties
36
what was churchlands first objection to jackson
The use of knowledge is used in different ways ; description and acquaintance
37
what is Jacksons reply to churchlands first argument
Jackson says types of knowledge are irrelevant—its the lack of COMPLETE knowledge when she knows all of the physical information Churchland’s criticism is misleading. The actual Knowledge Argument is the following: 1. Mary, before her release, knows everything physical there is to know about other people 2. Mary before her release does not know everything there is to know about other people 3. Therefore, there are truths about other people (and herself) which escape the physicalist theory
38
what is churchlands second objection
The knowledge argument is too strong Why? It proves too much. Just imagine a dualist was teaching Mary in her black and white room She gets taught everything there is to know about the dualist theory (qualia and non-physical stuff) She still learns something when She sees red This argument wipes out dualism as well
39
what is jacksons reply to churchlands second argument
Lectures, even from a dualist still doesn’t tell Mary are there is to know you would have to change the first premise; Mary before her release knows everything of the dualist sort there is to know about other people This isn’t plausible—the dualist cannot expect to be able to teach everything there is to know about the non-physical terms through lecture physical terms A physicalist WOULD argue that you can teach everything in physical terms not a dualist
40
what is churchlands third objection
The knowledge argument claims that Mary even with all her intelligence couldn’t imagine what is it like to see the color red But that might not actually be true If Mary really had that much physical information, then maybe she could figure out what it is like to see red
41
what is jacksons reply to churchlands third argument
What Mary can or cannot imagine is irrelevant— this issue is not about what she can imagine (sure maybe she can) When she encounters red for the first time she will still learn something.
42
“If her knowledge is defective, despite being all there is to know according to _______________, whatever her powers of imagination.” -Jackson
“If her knowledge is defective, despite being all there is to know according to ____physicalism, then physicalism is false,_____, whatever her powers of imagination.” -Jackson
43
what is a "further criticism" against the knowledge argument?
Jackson claims that Mary gains knowledge but It actually isn’t knowledge that she gains SHE undeniably gains something She learns an ability. She learns to know how red is represented to her, how to imagine it, how it looks. Propositional l knowledge vs an ability or a skill Knowing that vs knowing how
44
what is the difference between Promotional knowledge vs an ability or a skill
Knowing that vs knowing how
45
what is jacksons reply to the "further criticism"
Critic is correct here, Mary has picked up an ability, but she HAS also gained knowledge Doesn’t need to be one or the other jackson changes the argument to: Imagine before she is released, she takes a philosophy course on scepticism—arg for why we cant know anything. When she stops out She will question that she knows anything When she is hesitating, what is she worrying about? She is worried about whether she has gained knowledge
46
“Nothing you could tell of the ____________ captures the smell of a rose, for instance. Therefore, ___________________.” (Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia 127)
“Nothing you could tell of the ___physical sort___captures the smell of a rose, for instance. Therefore, _____ physicalism Is false ______.” (Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia 127)
47
in what way does Jackson agree with Ryle and diagree with smart and decsartes
There is no thing called mind (they shouldn’t have said that) The mental states are properties of the brain just as the physicalists say but they are NOT physical properties But physicalists are wrong to think that this disproves dualism
48
what is property dualism
Brain states cause mental states mental properties are ontologically irreducible and not physical
49
what is ontologically irreducible mean
mental properties are what they are they cannot be reduced to something else. You cant explain it in reduced terms.
50
according to property dualism Mental properties are ________ properties.
Mental properties are emergent properties.
51
what are the examples fo emergent properties
liquidity and solidity these states emerge from the physical properties
52
No matter how often B follows A, and no matter how initially obvious the causality of the connections seems, the hypothesis that A causes B can be overturned by an over-arching theory which shows the two as distinct effects of a common underlying causal process… The epiphenomenalist can say exactly the same about the connection between, for example ___________________. It is simply a consequence of the fact that certain happenings in the brains cause both.” (Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia 133)
No matter how often B follows A, and no matter how initially obvious the causality of the connections seems, the hypothesis that A causes B can be overturned by an over-arching theory which shows the two as distinct effects of a common underlying causal process… The epiphenomenalist can say exactly the same about the connection between, for example __hurtfullness and behaviour__. It is simply a consequence of the fact that certain happenings in the brains cause both.” (Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia 133)
53
decribe epiphenomenalism
a form of property dualism that maintains that while mental phenomenon are emergent from physical states of the brain they are casually inefficacious
54
what does it mean that mental states are casually inefficacious
Mental states do not CAUSE anything physically
55
how does epiphenomenology answer the problem of causation
The problem of mental causation does not exist in this theory because there is no interaction between mental states and physical states. It is all causal relation. PHYSICAL CAUSES MENTAL
56