1
Q

What was the name of the journal Sprague was published in? What year?

A

American Journal of Nephrology, 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(Sprague) How many US sites?

A

89 US sites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(Sprague) - Rayaldee normalized the 25 hydroxyvitamin D greater than 30 what percent of per protocol patients?

A

95%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(Sprague): Rayaldee reduced the PTH by at least 10% in what percentage of patients?

A

72%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Sprague): how many subjects/what percentage completed the 26 weeks in studies A and B?

A

354
83%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the half-life of Rayaldee?

A

25 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What should the serum calcium be below before initiating therapy?

A

9.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What’s the Rayaldee maintenance 25D level range?

A

30 to 100 ng/ml

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Prior to dose increase what should the serum ca, serum phosphorus and serum 25 be?

A

Serum calcium should be <9.8 milligrams per deciliter
Serum phosphorus should be <5.5 milligrams oer deciliter
Serum 25D < 100 nanograms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(Sprague): Figure 1 (25 D)
What were the 25D levels at the start of the study?
What were the levels in 3-4 weeks?

A

20 nanograms at start
30 nanograms in 3-4 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(Sprague): Fig 1 (25D)
When was steady state reached for the 30 mg dose? What did the vitamin D levels average?

A

Steady state reached At 12 weeks, vitamin D levels averaged 50-56 ng/ml

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(Sprague): Fig 1 (25D)

At how many weeks could dose titration occur? What could they titrate to?

A

Dose titration could occur at the start of week 13. Titration to 60 micrograms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(Sprague): Fig 1 (25D)

Steady-state serum 25D averaged ____ ng/ml and ______ ng/ml for subjects receiving Rayaldee 60 mcg daily.

A

69 and 67 ng/ml

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(Sprague): Fig 1 (25D)

What percentage of subjects increased the dose to 60 micrograms per day in the study?

A

74%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Sprague): Fig 2 (iPTH)

Intent to treat population what percentage of subjects had at least a 30% reduction of PTH irrespective of stage?

A

33% and 34% had at least a 30% reduction of PTH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Sprague): Fig 2 (iPTH)

What did the PTH level do as 25D increased with Rayaldee treatment?

A

PTH levels declined gradually but progressively as 25D increased with Rayaldee treatment.

17
Q

(Sprague): Fig 2 (iPTH)

What was the per protocol population percentage of patients having a 30% reduction in PTH?

A

22% of pts had a 30% reduction after 12 weeks
40% of patients had a 30% reduction after 26 weeks
50% of pts had a 30% reduction after 52 weeks

18
Q

(Sprague): Fig 3 (response rates)

After six months (26 weeks) when an HCP brings the patient back to check labs this is what they should observe:

A

72% had at least a 10% reduction in PTH
60% had at least a 20% reduction in PTH
40% had at least a 30% reduction in PTH

19
Q

(Sprague): Fig 4 (CA and phosphorus)

Calcium and phosphorus were similar to what?

A

Calcium and phosphorus were similar to placebo (.2 versus .1)

20
Q

(Sprague): Fig 3 (Response Rates)

After three months (12 weeks), when an HCP brings a patient back to check labs for the first time this is what should be observed using 30 mg:

A

22% of patients had at least a 30% reduction in PTH

40% of patients had at least a 20% reduction in PTH

60% of patients had at least a 10% reduction in PTH

21
Q

(Sprague): What was the study design?

A

Two identical studies (studies A and B) with multicenter, randomized, double blind and placebo-controlled trials conducted for 26 weeks followed by one open label extension for an additional 26 weeks (total exposure to study drug was 52 weeks).

22
Q

What are the key factors driving growth of CKD?

A

Obesity, hypertension, diabetes

23
Q

CKD affects more than what percentage of the US population and approximately how many people?

A

6% or 20 million

24
Q

SHPT affects what percentage of stage 3 and stage 4 patients?

A

40% of stage 3 and 82% of stage 4 patients

25
Q

Vitamin D insufficiency affects an estimated what percent of patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD?

A

71% of stage 3 and 83% of stage 4

26
Q

Vitamin D insufficiency is defined as

A

Low 25 hydroxyvitamin D less than 30. Increased expression of Cyp24A1 which catabolizes 25 hydroxyvitamin D to 24/25 dyhydroxyvitamin D.

27
Q

SHPT is characterized by

A

Excessive (high) parathyroid hormone, vitamin D insufficiency (low), phosphate (high ) retention, elevated (high) FGF23, reduced (low) serum total 1.25 hydroxy vitamin D and low calcium.

28
Q

Fill in the blank:

(Sprague): At 12 weeks dose titration could occur to _____ mg.

A

60 micrograms

29
Q

At 12 week titration on the 60mg vitamin D levels averaged

A

69 and 67 ng

30
Q

(Sprague): fill in the blank

The dose was increased to ___ μg at the start of week 13 if PTH was ____ pg/mL (the upper limit of the laboratory reference range), serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D was ___ ng/mL, and serum calcium was ____ mg/dL.

A

Dose increased to 60 mg,
if PTH was < 70 pg/ml,
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was <65 ng/ml,
Serum calcium was <9.8 mg/dl.

31
Q

(Sprague):

How many total subjects?

How many subjects in study A?

How many subjects in study B?

A

429 total subjects.

213 in study A

216 in study B

32
Q

(Sprague): How many subjects/what percent of subjects entered the single 6-month open label extension study?

A

298 (69%)

33
Q

(Sprague): what was the primary efficacy end point?

A

The number and percent of subjects in the intent to treat population (ITT) that attained a mean decrease greater than or equal to 30% in plasma iPTH from pretreatment baseline to the efficacy assessment period (EAP) defined as the last 6 weeks of the 26 and 52 week treatment periods.