General Elements Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

Actus reus

A

Guilty act
Must be voluntary for there to be fault/ crime R v hill and Baxter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conduct crime

A

Conduct itself amounts to crime eg statutory offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consequence crime

A

Must be consequence for there to be offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State of affairs

A

D can be guilty by just finding themselves in a state of affairs
R v larsonneur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Omission

A

Usually ar is an action but can be a failure to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Pitt wood

A

Duty to act arises from contractual duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v gibbons and proctor

A

Duty arises from relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v dobson and stone R v Evan’s

A

Duty arises from assumption of that duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Evan’s and R v miller

A

There is a duty bc d set in motion chain of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v dytham

A

Duty arose from Ds official position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causation

A

Factual and then legal.
Factual has to be proven first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Factual

A

But for test r v paggett and r v white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legal causation

A

Chain of causation can’t be broken
D must be substantial and operating cause in final injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chain of causation

A

Must be an unbroken ‘chain’ between ds action and the final consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Kimsey

A

Chain of causation d conduct must be more than minimal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What can break coc

A

Act of third party
Victims own act
Unpredictable act of nature

17
Q

Act of third party

A

Usually medical negligence
R v smith de minimus
R v Jordan medical conduct must be palpably wrong
R v Cheshire must be so bad it renders defendants act insignificant

18
Q

Act of victim

A

Victim must act unforseeably and unexpectedly
R v Robert’s jumping out of car in fear of SA understandable
R v William’s jumping out in fear of being pickpocketed isn’t