general elements of criminal liability Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

AR def

A
  • conduct element that normally involves a positive, voluntary action
  • can be from an omission or state of affairs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

conduct crimes

A
  • what D does
  • drink driving
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

consequence crimes

A
  • Ar must cause onsequence (Marchant v Muntz)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

state of affairs crimes

A

being there in prohibited circumstances (Larsonneur)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

6 duties

A
  • statutory duties
  • contractual (pittwood)
  • official position (Dytham)
  • special relationship (Gibbins & proctor)
  • duty undertaken voluntary
    (stone & Dobinson)
  • creating a dangerous situation (Miller)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

examples of statutory duties

A
  • failing to wear a seatbelt ot give breath specimen - Road Traffic Act 1988
  • Failing to muzzle a dangerous dog in public - Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
  • Neglecting a child (Domestic violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

exception to omissions

A

if doctor decides to stop treating a patient + it is in best interest of patient it is not an omission (Airedale NHS trust v Bland)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 parts of causation

A
  • Factual cause
  • legal cause
  • no intervening act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

factual causation

A
  • unlawful consequence not happen ‘but for D’s actions)
    (white - no) (pagett - Yes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

legal causation

A
  • more than minimal cause not necessarily only (kimsey)
  • (Benge - substantial cause)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

thin skull rule ( part of legal causation)

A
  • special characteristic or vulnerability maked D more liable for the more serious injury
  • D must take v as they find him
  • Blaue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

intervening acts

examples

A
  • unforeseen act of nature
  • unforeseeable act of 3rd party
  • v’s own conduct (forseeable? Roberts - yes, williams - no)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

medial treatment aand chain of causation

A
  • unlikely to break
  • D was a ‘operating and substantial cause of v’s death (smith)
  • cheshire - D’s actions had ‘significantly’ contributed to the death
  • breaks chain if exceptionally bad - Jordan ‘palpably wrong’ and overwhelming cause
  • life support of not break chain causation (Malcharek)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mens rea

A
  • mental element
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intent

A
  • subjective
  • direct - main aim (Mohan)
  • indirect - virtual certain and D appreciated it was (Woolin)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

recklessness

A
  • sujectictive
  • D has to be aware of risk (cunningham/RvG)
  • goes ahead anywaay
16
Q

negligence

A
  • fall below standard of reasonable person
  • objective
  • adomako
17
Q

strict liability

A
  • no fault offences
  • prohibited consequence
  • guilty even if taken reasonable precautions (Callow v Tillstone)
  • no defence of due dillegence or honest mistake (cundy v le Cocq/Harrow v Shah)
18
Q

transferred malice

A
  • when D intended to commit a crime agains a but commits same offence against B (Latimer + Gnango)
  • Canno be transfered if cime is different (Pembliton)
19
Q

coinciding of Ar + MR

A
  • both AR and MR must coincide
20
Q

continuing act

A
  • initial Ar
  • D forms MR while Ar is going on
  • said to coincide
  • Fagan
21
Q

series of connected acts

A
  • MR then D forms a series of vvents which connect together from the Ar
  • said to coincide
    (thabo Meli)