General theoretical explanations Flashcards
Why did Durkheim believe crime was inevitable?
Some people are inadequately socialised meaning they are more likely to deviate. Some people are exposed to different influences and circumstances: it is impossible for them to all be alike. Not every member of society can be equally committed to the same collective sentiments.
What society did Durkheim imagine?
A society of perfect people where the standard of behaviour would be so high that the slightest slip would be considered a serious offence.
What did Durkheim argue were the positive functions of crime?
Social integration, social regulation and social change
What is social integration?
The cohesion that members of society experience when they share a collective expectation of the norms and values.
How does crime cause social integration?
People tend to come together when someone has committed a terrible crime. There is a shared sense of anger towards the breach of morals that the criminal has committed.
How does crime cause social change?
Deviant behaviour causes people to reflect on what is or is not allowed within society. Allows them to discover when the law does not line up with the collective sentiments of the majority. Leads to necessary legal reform which benefits the community.
How does crime cause social regulation?
By punishing the offender authorities are sending a warning message to the rest of society.
How did Durkheim view society?
As a stable structure based upon shared norms, values and beliefs concerning right and wrong.
How do subcultures impact social norms?
Shared rules of behaviour become less clear. Shared norms become weaker.
According to Merton, what causes crime?
The vision of success in American culture is attached to material and financial gain. Anomie is caused by the pressure to accomplish these goals. There is a strain between society’s expectations and the means to live up to them. People turn away from legitimate means of achieving success.
What is anomie?
The state of lawlessness that comes with a breakdown of social order. People feel untethered to the collective consciousness entering a normative confusion.
What are the five responses to strain to anomie?
Conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism and rebellion
What is conformity?
Following the normative means of achieving success regardless of structural setbacks.
What is innovation?
Accepting the goal but finding alternative means to achieve it.
What is ritualism?
Abandoning the goal but still conforming to the means to achieve it.
What is retreatism?
Rejecting both the goal and the means to achieve it.
What is rebellion?
Rejecting existing goals to replace them with new alternative goals.
What are the advantages of strain theory?
Considers how social structures create pressure to turn to deviance. Explains why certain demographics may be more likely to commit crime.
What are the disadvantages of strain theory?
Does not explain non-utilitarian crimes. Gives too much focus to individual crime ignoring group deviancy. Disproportionately attributes criminal activity to the working-class. Uses official crime statistics which tend to obscure white-collar crime.
Which group does status frustration affect the most?
Young, working-class males.
Why does status frustration effect young, working-class males?
Generally valued forms of success are impossible for many groups to attain. Felt discouragement because of being defined as failures and denied respect from the rest of society.
What does status frustration cause?
Use their shared problem to collectively form a deviant subculture which flips the norms of the dominant culture. The behaviours valued by the subculture are those that wider society tends to condemn.
Why do members of deviant subcultures commit crimes?
Members are rewarded with praise and status if they successfully carry out criminal behaviours. Gaining each others respect and striking back at the society that has rejected them.
What are the advantages of status frustration?
Explains non-utilitarian crimes. Explains the prevalence of group deviance.