General VF Screening Techniques Flashcards
(37 cards)
non automated instruments and techniques
- confrontation fields (count to full fingers, field limits confrontations, color confrontations- red cap, face confrontations)
- tangent screen
sensitivity of confrontations to all types of VF loss:
50-60%
sensitivity of confrontations to ON-related VF loss:
20-30%
what type of VF loss has a high sensitivity with face confrontations?
central scotomas
sensitivity of confrontations to chaismal VF loss
40-50%
sensitivity of confrontations to post-chiasmal VF loss
> 75%
non-automated strategy that is rapid, informal, very gross, often used, and can check for extinction phenomenon
count fingers confrontations
extinction phenomenon can occur in some cases of ____ damage
parietal cortex damage
extinction phenomenon presents as what type of loss
homonymous hemianopsia contralateral to the lesion
what conditions on count fingers confrontations must be present to see the extinction phenomenon?
only if fingers are presented on both sides of the vertical midline simultaneously
non-automated strategy that only tests the absolute limits of the VF, has much variability/fluctuation in peripheral VF, has very limited usefulness
field-limits confrontations
why are field-limits confrontations much less useful than count fingers
few VF defects affect peripheral VF limits only
what can the red cap test (color confrontations) be useful in detecting?
very helpful in detecting mild central or centrocecal scotomas due to optic nerve disease
what can the red cap test (color confrontations) in quadrant comparison specifically be useful in detecting?
VF loss from chiasmal compression
- pituitary adenoma
- craniopharyngloma
pituitary adenoma would result in what defect on the red cap-quadrant comparison test?
superior temporal quadrants ou red cap is less red than superior nasal
craniopharyngloma would result in what defect on the red cap quadrant comparison test?
in inferior temporal quandrants OU, red cap is less red than in inferior nasal
face confrontations useful in detection of:
central scotomas, centrocecal scotomas, altitudinal hemanopsias and metamiorphosia
tangent screen technique is useful in diagnosis of:
functional vision loss such as hysterical amblyopia
SAP automated perimetry
standard automated perimetry, white-on-white perimetry
3 alternative forms of perimetry list
- SWAP
- FDT
- HEP
SWAP alternative perimetry is:
short wavelength automated, blue stimulus on yellow background perimetry
FDT alternative perimetry is:
in FDT and Matrix
frequency doubling testing
HEP alternative perimetry is:
Heidelberg Edge Perimetry, “frequency defined form”
2 problems in glaucoma detection with standard white-on-white perimetry (SAP)
- does not detect glaucomatous change early in many cases
- slow, fatiguing causes artifactuous (due to fatigue not disease) VF loss, so reliability and repeatability are often compromised