GI Flashcards

(99 cards)

1
Q

Esoph H/P

A
  • History: dysphagia, odynophagia, wt loss/nutrition, cough, pain, smoking/EtOH, GERD
  • Physical: abdomen, SCV nodes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Workup Esoph

A
  • Labs: CBC, CMP, LFTs
  • EGD w/ biopsy: distance from incisors, obstructing
  • Initial imaging:
    • CT c/a/p with oral/IV contrast
    • PET/CT – recommended by NCCN
  • Staging EUS (no M1); FNA LNs
    • EUS accuracy T, 80-90%; N, 50-80%

Other

  • Nutritional assessment for J-tube placement (PEG only for cervical lesions)
  • Smoking cessation
  • PFTs
  • Bronchosocpy if at or above carina to r/o fistula
  • Her2 if mets adeno (10% amp)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Landmarks by distance from incisors:

A

Landmarks by distance from incisors:
15-20 cm cervical (cricoid)
20-25 cm Upper thoracic (sternal notch to azygous)
25-35 cm Mid thoracic (Azygous to Pulmonary vein)
35-40 cm Lower Thoracic (Pulm Vein to GEJ)
40-45 cm GE junction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Transthoracic (Ivor-Lewis)

A

Transthoracic (Ivor-Lewis) - better for proximal

  • 2 incisions – upper abdominal, right lateral
  • Pro: Oncologic procedure
  • Con: Heartburn, tight proximal margin, pulmonary complications, mediastinal leak
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trans-hiatal surgery

A

Trans-hiatal - better for distal

  • 2 incisions: L neck, laparotomy – cervical anastomosis (cervical esophagus to stomach)
  • Pros: Less morbid/pain, avoids thoracotomy, leaks are less dangerous in neck- easily managed and no mediastinitis, clear proximal margin, less heartburn
  • Cons: Can’t see upper/mid-thoracic tumor, LND only via blunt dissection, can’t access subcarinal LN, more anastomotic leaks
  • > 15 LN should be removed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Esophagus # of cases

A

16,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Esoph nodal drainage

A

Upper 1/3: sup mediastinum, SCV, cervical;
mid 1/3: either
lower 1/3: lower mediastinum or celiac

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Esoph T/N/M stage

A
T1: mucosa and submucosa
   *T1a: lamina propria, MM (7% N+)
   *T1b: submucosa (20% N+)
T2: muscularis propria (40% N+)
T3: adventitia (note: no serosa)
T4: adj structures
   *T4a: still resectable (pleura, pericardium, diaphragm)
   *T4b: not resectable (aorta, vertebral body, trachea, adj organs [liver, panc, lung, spleen])

Nodal staging (by number, not by location)
N1: 1-2
N2: 3-6
N3: 7+

M1: distant including retroperitoneal, PA nodes, positive peritoneal cytology (most common sites = liver, lung, bone, adrenals, pleural, kidneys)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Esoph Overall stage

A
Adeno:
I : T1N0
IIA: T1N1
IIB: T2N0
III: T2N1, T3-4aN0-1
IVA: N2-3 or T4b
IVB: M1
Sqcc:
I: T1 N0-1
II: T2 N0-1 or T3 N0
III: T3 N1 or N2
IVA: T4 or N3
IVB M1
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Siewart Stages

A

I: +5 to +1 cm
II: +1 to -2 cm
III: -2 to -5 cm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Esoph T1a Management

A

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection +/- ablation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Esoph cT2-T4a, N0-N+ (operable) Management

A

cT2-T4a, N0-N+ (operable)
-CRT -> PET/CT -> surgery (3-6 wks after CRT) -> Nivolumab! for residual disease

-RT: 50.4 Gy
-Chemo:
Cis 75mg/m2 and 5FU 1000mg/m2 weeks 1 and 4

Dont forget Nivolumab!!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Inoperable T2+ or N+ Esoph Managment

A

Inoperable T2+ or N+: Definitive CRT

  • RT: 50.4 Gy
  • Chemo: Cis 75 and 5FU 1000 weeks 1, 4, 8, 11
  • consider chemo alone for T4b SCC invading trachea, great vessels, heart
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cervical esophagus management

A

Cervical esophagus: Definitive CRT

  • 45 Gy to larger volume including SCV -> 50.4 or mid 60s (2 RCTs showing no difference between CRT alone vs. surgery, both went to mid 60s – higher dose to achieve surgical equivalency)
  • chemo is carbo/tax (CROSS – 49% pCR) or FOLFOX (French trial, showed less toxicity than cis/5-FU)
  • sup extension likely <5 cm, up to level III
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Esoph T1b-T2<3cm management

A

esophagectomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Esoph Sim

A
  • NPO 2-4 hours if distal tumor
  • 4D CT simulation with IV and oral contrast
  • supine, arms up in wingboard/vac lock (if above carina, do arms down and S-frame)
  • scan from cricoid to L3 (below celiac)
  • PET/CT fusion
  • Daily KV imaging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Esoph volumes and fields

A

4 field plan (AP/PA + RPO/LPO) weighted AP-PA or 3 field

GTV: gross tumor and enlarged nodes – defined by CT, PET, EGD/EUS
CTV: GTV + 3-4 cm sup/inf, 1 cm radial on primary and nodes; respecting anatomic boundaries (cut out of heart, liver, vertebral body)
-ENI: cervical – SCV; proximal – para-esophageal; distal – celiac, lesser curvature (located in gastrohepatic ligament)
PTV: CTV + 1 cm

  • if using 4DCT, contour on average
  • Can use IMRT (MDACC) to spare the heart and lungs but pay attention to lung V5 and dose to uninvolved stomach (which will be used for anastomosis) – MDACC Lin IJROBP 2012 showed similar acute tox but improved OS w IMRT (due to less cardiac deaths)!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Esoph Constraints

A

Total Lung
V40<10%
V20<20%
V5<50%

Cord Max 45

Heart
V30<30
Mean <26

Kidney
V18<33%

Liver
Mean<25 Gy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Esoph 5 yr OS

A
5yr OS:
I – 60%
II – 30%
III – 20%
IV - < 5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Gastric # of cases

A

~28k cases/yr

2nd leading cause of cancer death worldwide after lung

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Stomach EUS layers

A

EUS 5 layers: alt hyper-hypoechoic

1: superficial mucosa (hyper)
2: deep mucosa (hypo)
3: submucosa
4: muscularis propria
5: subserosa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Gastrectomy

A

Gastrectomy:
-goal is > 5 cm margin, >15 LN

Total – proximal (cardia, greater curvature, fundus) with roux en y; J tube

Subtotal – distal (antrum/body)
Both are G-J anastomosis:
Billroth I: end to end; J tube
Billroth II: end to side; J tube (below)

  • picture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Gastric dissections

A

Dissections (often D1 in US):
D1: peri-gastric
D2: D1 + celiac + 3 branches (common hepatic, splenic, L gastric)
D3: D2 + PA nodes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Gastric Staging TNM

A

Close enough to esophagus

T1a: mucosa, lamina propria
T1b: submucosa
T2: muscularis propria
T3: subserosa
T4a: serosa (visceral peritoneum)
T4b: adjacent structures
Nodal staging has changed:
N1: 1-2
N2: 3-6
N3a: 7-15
N3b: >15
Dissect minimum 15

M1: includes involvement of distant nodes (portal, mesenteric, retropancreatic, para-aortic, RP) and positive cytology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Gastric overall stage
``` IA: add to 1 IB: add to 2 IIA: add to 3 IIB: add to 4 III: all else IV: M1 ```
26
Intestinal vs. Diffuse
Intestinal vs. Diffuse Intestinal: H. pylori, better prognosis Diffuse: familia, linitis plastica, poorly differentiated, signet ring
27
Gastric Operable clinical T2+ or N+ Management
Operable clinical T2+ or N+: similar to esophagus 1) Periop chemo [chemo x 4 > surgery > chemo x 4] - chemo = FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, taxotere)
28
Gastric inoperable
CRT or chemo -> restage -> eval for surgery
29
Gastric Post-op
If no preop chemo: R0: T3-4 or N+: chemo ->CRT->chemo for D1 chemo for D2 R1-2: CRT with 5-FU If pre-op chemo: R0: chemo R1-2: CRT
30
Gastric Sim/Volumes
- 4D CT simulation with IV and oral contrast - empty stomach (fast 3 hrs prior) - supine, arms up, vac-lock bag for immobilization - fuse pre-op CT - Daily KV imaging - Use CBCT if unresectable/pre-op, concern w kidney or heart constraints, or boosting > 45 Gy - CTV = 1) pre-op stomach/tumor bed/ remnant, 2) surgical clips and anastomoses, 3) nodes (celiac and branches, perigastric, suprapancreatic, porta hepatis, splenic) - if distal – no splenic, add subpyloric - PTV= CTV+1 cm
31
Gastric Dose and fields
``` Dose: R0 45 Gy R1 boost to 50.4 R2 boost to 54 (if boosting, conedown after 45 to GTV + 1.5 cm) ``` ``` 4 fields (AP/PA, RAO/LPO) - mixed energy, weight AP-PA heavily IMRT only if constrained by heart/kidney ``` Classic 4 field borders are: AP-PA sup-inf: T10-L3 lat: 2/3 L diaphragm to cover splenic nodes and 3-4 cm on R vertebral body to cover porta hepatis LAT: post - split verteb bod, ant abd wall *Before drawing: ask for location of both kidneys, pre-op stomach, remaining stomach, anastomoses, celiac, porta hepatis, SMA, splenic
32
ANATOMIC LANDMARKS: | celiac, SMA, Porta hepatis
ANATOMIC LANDMARKS: Celiac T12 SMA L1 Porta hepatis 2cm to R of T11/L1
33
Pancreas # cases
54k cases/45k deaths 4th leading cause of cancer deaths
34
Pancreas H/P
- History: n/v, satiety, pale, greasy stools, jaundice, pain, wgt loss, migratory thrombophlebitis, DVT (trousseau’s sign) - risk factors: smoking, diabetes, family history (Peutz-Jeghers, BRCA 1/2, HNPCC) - Physical: jaundice, abd exam, weight loss (common triad) palable gallbladder (Courvoisier’s sign) FH: BRCA1/2, PeutzJeghers
35
Panc Imaging
- Imaging: - CT c/a/p w panc protocol (triphasic: arterial, late arterial, portal venous; thin slice, 3D recon); could get MRI primary as well - EUS w FNA biopsy –preferred per NCCN; lower risk of seeding than CT guided FNA - ERCP with stenting if biliary obs Pancreas lies at L1/L2
36
Whipple
Whipple: •Distal stomach (can have pyloric sparing to prevent dumping syndrome) •Duodenum & prox jejunum •Head lesion: partial body of pancreas; tail lesion: remove body/tail spleen •GB, distal CBD •Anastomosis: Pancreas → Jejunum Chole → Jejunum Gastro → Jejunum Goal is R0 resection – +margin has poor survival (+RP margin most common)
37
Panc T/N Stage
``` T1a: <0.5cm T1b 0.5-1.0cm T1c: >1cm-2cm T2: 2-4 cm T3: >4cm T4: +celiac, SMA, CHA ``` N1: 1-3 nodes N2: 4+ nodes
38
Panc Overall stage
``` IA, T1: < 2cm IB: T2: >2cm IIA: T3: >4 IIB: N1: 1-3 III: T4 or N2: 4+ Nodes IV: M1 ```
39
Panc Resectability
Ask about CA, SMA, Common Hepatic, Aorta, SMV/PV Resectable: no Arterial contact <180 Vein without vein contour irregularity Borderline resectable: <180 Arterial Reconstructable Venous contact Unresectable: >180 SMA or CA Unreconstructable SMV/PV
40
Panc resectable management
Resectable: surgery -> chemo mFOLFIRINOX -> restage -> CRT (if positive margin)
41
Borderline resectable management:
Borderline: FOLFIRINOX x 8 cycles -> 36/15 chemoRT with capecitabine -> surgery Cord<36 Kidneys mean <12
42
Panc Sim
- 4D CT simulation with IV and oral contrast, empty stomach - scan carina to top of femoral heads - supine, arms up, arm shuttle - fuse pre-op CT (PET for definitive) - Daily KV imaging, CBCT if unresectable/borderline (gross dz)
43
Panc constraints
RTOG 0848: Liver: Mean liver <24 Gy Kidney: V18 <33% and mean < 18 Gy if 2 kidneys. V18 <15% if 2 kidney. Small bowel/ Stomach: Max dose ≤54 Gy. V45 <15% Spinal Cord: Max 0.03 cc ≤45 Gy
44
Panc OS, MS, LC, DM
``` Resectable: 3yr OS 30% MS 28 mo LC 70% DM 70% ``` Borderline: MS 18 mo Unresectable: MS 10 months 2yr OS 20%
45
Panc OS, MS, LC, DM
``` Resectable: 3yr OS 30% MS 28 mo LC 70% DM 70% ``` Borderline: MS 18 mo Unresectable: MS 10 months 2yr OS 20%
46
Panc long term side effects
LATE: | ulceration, stricture formation, obstruction, pancreatic exocrine dysfunction
47
Panc long term side effects
LATE: | ulceration, stricture formation, obstruction, pancreatic exocrine dysfunction
48
Panc Follow up
Follow-up: -HP, CA 19-9 and CT q6 months for 2 years, then annually -Ca 19-9 prognostic – post-op > 90 has low survival (RTOG 9704)
49
Panc Post op volumes
Post-op: 50.4 Gy (RTOG 0848) Target: fuse pre-op CT to planning CT CTV = tumor bed (clips; discuss w/surgeon + op-note) + pancreatico-jejunostomy + nodal groups = P3SC (Peri-pancreatic, Porta Hepatis, P-A, SMA/SMV, celiac) ``` CTV Target volumes (RTOG atlas) -Celiac: Most proximal 1.5 cm -SMA: Most proximal 3 cm (3 letters) -PV: segment of PV slightly to right of, anterior to and antero-medial to IVC (patient’s right). Contour PV from just above its junction w/SMV and go superior and lateral until center of PV width has moved past R lateral edge of IVC  stop. Expand celiac, SMA, PV and PJ by 1 cm ``` -Aorta: start at most superior of celiac, PJ or PV and then cover down to L2. Expand off aorta: 2.5 cm to right, 2.5 cm anterior, 1 cm to left and 0.2 cm posterior -Aortic expansion should be as high as PJ or PV expansion -If there is a pancreatico-gastrostomy, DO NOT include it (b/c food will go through) -Crop CTV from liver or stomach PTV = CTV + 0.5 cm w/daily IGRT
50
Panc intact volumes
``` Definitive (Intact): CTV = GTV + 1.5 cm PTV = CTV + 0.5 cm -No elective nodes (95% failures in PTV) -Boost to 54 if meeting normal tissue constraints (can use IMRT) ```
51
Cholangiocarcinoma cell type
Cholangiocarcinoma – bile duct epithelium
52
Klatskin Tumor
Klatskin Tumor – extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at confluence of R and L hepatic ducts; best prognosis
53
Cholangio Workup
``` Same w/u as pancreas +: -CEA -Abd U/S -Liver MRI -MRCP for EHC (MRCP is non-invasive, while ERCP is) -ERCP or percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis ```
54
Intrahepatic Ddx
Intrahepatic Ddx: HCC, liver mets (need biliary epithelium stains to distinguish)
55
Cholangio T staging
``` T1a – lamina propia T1b – muscle T2 – connective tissue T3 – serosa, invades adj organs T4 – portal vein, hepatic artery, 2+ adj sites ```
56
Bile duct anatomy
*picture
57
Cholangio treatment when resectable
• Surgery, cholecystectomy with partial hepatectomy -> adjuvant capecitabine (preferred) CRT is an option as well Adjuvant chemo: 4-6 months
58
Cholangio Unresectable
Chemo or • Neoadjuvant gem/cis -> liver RT (4.5 x 15 = 67.5, avoid conventional fractionation) - max mucosal pt dose 42 - mean liver = liver-GTV<20Gy
59
Cholangio survival
5yr OS GB: 50% for T1N0 MS overall 10 months IHC: 20-40% EHC: 30-50%
60
HCC Risk factors, screening
Risk Factors; Cirrhosis due to Hep B/C, EtOH, hemochromatosis, NASH, PBC, A1AT deficiency; Hep B/C carrier status Screening: U/S and AFP 12m (positive AFP is >100)
61
HCC MRI findings
Radiographic features: intense early arterial enhancement and early/rapid washout (rim/capsule that persists) - ask about vascular invasion - distant disease - other lesions
62
Child Pugh score
Child Pugh score: ``` Encephalopathy Ascites Albumin INR Bilirubin ```
63
HCC Staging
``` T1 – solitary, no vasc inv T2 – vasc inv, or many small tumors (< 5cm) T3a – many tumors> 5 cm T3b – portal or hepatic vein T4 – adj structures, visceral peritoneum ``` IVA – N1 IVB – M1
64
HCC UNOS Criteria
UNOS transplant criteria: one lesion < 5 cm or 3 lesions < 3 cm each, AFP<1000, no macrovascular invasion
65
Resectable HCC treatment
Resectable: 1) Partial hepatectomy (CPA, no portal htn, 20-40% liver remnant) 2) Liver transplant (Milan criteria: one lesion < 5 cm or 3 lesions < 3 cm each
66
Unresectable HCC treatment
Eval for transplant, if not a canddiate: ``` Local therapy(preferred): Ablation Arterial directed SBRT: 50/5: liver 700cc < 20 Gy 30/3: liver 700cc < 17.5 Gy ``` Chemo: Sorafenib or Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab (Class A only)
67
HCC Sim
``` Consider fiducial markers Supine in custom mold, arms up IV and PO contrast, NPO for 4 hours 4D-CT simulation with IV contrast -Fusion to diagnostic MRI or CT -CT tends to overestimate GTV for HCC Respiratory management with breath hold, abdominal compression or gating PPI/H2 blocker given to all patients ```
68
HCC volumes and dose
GTV=gross tumor PTV=ITV+0.5 cm - CPA: 16 Gy x 3 - CPB: 8 Gy x 5 15 fx to 67.5 – TH Probably safe to say 50/5 then deescalate to meet constraints -RTOG – starts at 50 Gy in 5 fractions, de-escalated based on liver dose (700cc and Veffective), lowest is 27.5/5 Volume receiving <20 Gy more than 700cc – 5 fraction. Volume receiving <15 Gy more than 700cc – 3 fraction.
69
HCC SBRT constraints
50/5 Cord max 30 Gy Liver 700 ml < 20 Gy -small bowel/stomach max 30 Gy
70
HCC 5yr OS LC
I – 50-60% II – 30-40% III – 10-20% IV - <10% LC 90%
71
RILD
RILD - 2-8 wks after RT - fatigue, RUQ pain, ascites, hepatomegaly - transaminitis - Veno-occlusive disease leading to hepatocyte atrophy -non-classic RILD – 30%, bump in CP by 2 points
72
Rectal Screening
Screening at age > 50 if no fam hx
73
Rectum anatomy distances
Anal verge: no hair Anal canal (~4 cm) – dentate line is mid-point Low rectum: 4-8 cm from verge Mid rectum: 8-12 cm from verge High rectum: >12 cm from verge Superior margin: peritoneal reflection, typically 12-15 cm from verge Muscle around rectum: puborectalis
74
Rectal Workup
-Labs: CBC, CMP, LFTs, CEA (normal <3), PSA - Imaging/Biopsy: - Proctoscopy – distance from anal verge - Colonoscopy with biopsy – make sure ileocecal valve visualized (7% synchronous primary) - EUS or MRI (depth of invasion) – muscularis propria is BLACK – EUS if can’t get MRI - CT c/a/p w oral and IV contrast
75
Rectal Surgery
Sugery: - LAR: low anterior resection for mid-upper lesions -> spares sphincter - APR: abdominoperioneal resection for low-lying lesions - TME: sharp dissection of entire mesorectum (peri-rectal fat, pre-sacral space) – reduces positive radial margin rate All get TME: LR 11 vs 25 % -4-5 cm margin (can be1-2 cm if low-lying) Should try to get at least 14 nodes for complete LN evaluation
76
Rectal LN drainage
LN drainage: - Proximal: IMA  portal (liver mets) - Distal: int iliac  IVC (lung mets) - Anus/sphincter: inguinals
77
Rectal TNM
``` T1: submucousa T2: muscularis T3: serosal, peri-rectal T4a: visceral peritoneum T4b: adjacent organs ``` ``` N1a: 1 N1b: 2-3 N1c: tumor deposits in subserosa, etc N2a: 4-6 N2b: 7+ ``` M1a: solitary nonregional node or single site (liver, lung, ovary) M1b: More than one site M1c: peritoneal mets
78
Rectal Overall Stage
I: T1-2 N0 IIA: T3N0 IIB: T4aN0 IIC: T4bN0 III: N+ IIIA:T1-2,N1, T1N2a IIIB:T3-4aN1, T2-3N2a, T1-2, N2b IIIC: T4aN2a-b,T3N2b, T4bN1-2 IVA: M1a IVB: M1b
79
Rectal Stage I treatment
I: T1-T2N0 T1N0: transanal excision -> close f/u -need FULL THICKNESS WLE - <3cm, negative margin (> 3 mm), <30% circumference, well-diff (grade 1-2), no LVI, within 8 cm of anal verge (rule of 3s) -if path shows T2 or bad T1 (deep 1/3 of T1, Grade 3, LVI, or positive margins) -> LF > 15-20% > recommend oncologic surgery (LAR/APR) and if refuse, post-op chemoRT T2N0: LAR/APR – give risk of lymphatics 20% - if just give chemo, LR 20% (CALGB, Bleday BWH) – continuous tail -if tumor close to anus, can downstage with chemoRT
80
Rectal T3 or N+
TNT | Long course or Short Course w/ capecitabine -> 12 weeks FOLFOX - > Restage -> Surgery
81
Rectal Stage IV with solitary liver or lung met
IV: solitary liver met CRM clear-FOLFOX x 3 > 5 Gy x 5 > LAR and liver resection CRM compromised->Folfox x 3-> Long course-> surgery short course max dose 27.8 to everything surgery 1 week after RT
82
Rectal if surgery first
Rectal, if surgery first: - pT1- observation - pT2N0: LAR - pT3-4, or N1+: chemo (FOLFOX) -> chemoRT or in reverse same as TNT
83
Rectal Volumes and fields
- CTV_45 Gy: all gross disease, entire mesorectum, presacral, internal iliac nodes (external if T4 – such as invasion of prostate) - CTV_50.4: GTV (or pre-op tumor) + 2.5 cm + presacral LN and mesorectum/sacral hollow ``` 3 field technique: PA-laterals Sup: L5/S1 Inf: 2 cm below tumor Lat: 2cm on brim Post: 1cm behind sacrum and Ant: 1cm behind pubic symphysis ``` -if invading prostate  cover external iliacs T4: 1) Lats: anterior border is >1 cm anterior to pubic symphysis (to cover external iliacs) Lateral wedges with posterior heel Dose: 50. 4 pre-op (45 Gy then conedown) 50. 4 post-op 59. 4 definitive (refuse surgery, not resectable)
84
Rectal Constraints
Bowel (bag) V45 < 200 cc Point dose max 54 Bladder: max < 50 Gy V40 < 40 Femoral head: max < 50 Gy V45 < 25%
85
Rectal OS
OS: I – 90% II – 80% III –40- 60%
86
Rectal Followup
Follow-up: - NCCN: q3 month H+P exam, CEA if elevated at onset x 2 years, then q6 month for total 5 years, colonoscopy in 1 year and then every 5 years, CT C/A/P annually for 3-5 years - do NOT do PET/CT
87
Anal H/P
- History: bleeding, anal discomfort, pruritis, rectal urgency - sexual history, HIV, HPV (85% anal ca’s) and h/o anal intraepithelial neoplasia. -Physical: exam with bilateral inguinal exam and proctoscopy. DRE for sphincter tone, mobility, distance from anal verge. If female, gyn exam (with pap!). If male, sperm banking.
88
Anal Workup
- Labs: CBC, CMP, LFT, LDH, HPV, HIV - Pap smear - Imaging: - Anoscopy with bx of mass - Colonoscopy (10% synchronus) - CT c/a/p - PET/CT for T3/T4 or N+ - EUS or MRI for transanal nodes - Biopsy: - FNA of clinically + inguinal nodes - Only 50% cN+ are malignant 80-90% SCC HPV 16,18,31,33
89
Anal Canal anatomy
Anal canal 4 cm long from anal verge to anorectal ring Dentate line transition from nonkeratinized squamous epithelium to colorectal columnar mucosa - Above drains to peri-rectal and internal iliac - Below inguinal, external iliac Anal margin is 5 cm skin around the anus Note: mostly a locoregional disease. Distant mets uncommon
90
Anal TNM
T1: ≤2cm T2: 2.1-5 cm T3: > 5cm T4: adjacent organ invasion (not including rectum, peri-rectal skin, anal sphincter) N1a: inguinal, mesorectal, internal iliac N1b: external iliac N1c: external iliac and N1 M1: mets including PA nodes
91
Anal Overall Stage
I: T1 N0 IIA: T2 N0 IIB: T3 N0 IIIA: T1-2N1 IIIB: T4N0 IIIC: T3-4N1 IV: M1 T1: ≤2cm T2: 2.1-5 cm T3: > 5cm T4: adjacent organ invasion (not including rectum, peri-rectal skin, anal sphincter) N1a: inguinal, mesorectal, internal iliac N1b: external iliac N1c: external iliac and N1 M1: mets including PA nodes
92
Anal Stage I-III treatment
``` Stage I-III Def chemoRT -IMRT: T2: 50.4, T3: 54 -Chemo: day 1 and 29 5-FU: 1000mg/m2 (1-4, 29-32) Mitomycin: 10 mg/m2 ``` Stage IV: Cisplatin/5FU +/- RT
93
Anal Margin Ca Cancer treatment
Anal margin – must be MARGIN (5cm) – if T1N0 anal canal, do chemoRT - Well differentiated T1 (<2 cm): WLE with >1 cm margin; if margins inadequate, re-excise or RT+5FU/cape - T2-T4 or N+: definitive chemoRT as for anal canal; if had surgery then post-op RT similar to anal canal Adeno: treat like rectal
94
Anal Sim
- Sim supine, frog-leg, full bladder, vac lack bag. Wire nodes, anal marker. - Give oral contrast 2 hours prior - CT from L1 to mid femur
95
IMRT dose/volumes anal
``` T2N0: • PTVA (primary tumor): 50.4 Gy in 28 fx of 1.8 Gy • N0 nodes (all nodal regions receives): 42 Gy in 28 fx of 1.5 Gy ``` ``` T3-4N0 or N+: • PTVA 54 Gy in 30 fx of 1.8 • N0 nodes or uninvolved nodes: 45 Gy in 30 fx of 1.5 Gy • LN ≤ 3 cm + 1 cm: 50.4 Gy in 30 fx of 1.68 Gy • LN > 3 cm + 1 cm: 54 Gy in 30 fx of 1.8 Gy ``` Nodes: mesorectum, presacrum, internal iliac, external iliac, inguinal
96
Aanl Constraints
Small bowel (diff because of MMC): V30 < 200 cc Vulva/penis: Max < 40 Gy Femoral neck: Max < 45 Gy Bladder: V40<40% *colostomy rate is 10%*
97
Anal OS
``` 5 yr OS: I – 90-95% II – 70-80% III – 40-50% IV - 10% ```
98
Anal Side effects
Acute: - MitoC – low plt (hold if plt<50) and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Check labs 2x/week. Pulm fibrosis - 5-FU: mucositis and hand-foot syndrome - RT: skin rxn, proctitis, diarrhea, cystitis Late: - 10% risk of femoral neck fracture at 54 Gy - remember vaginal dilator - sterility, impotence
99
Anal follow-up
Follow-up: 8-12 weeks: exam + DRE If complete remission > DRE every 3-6 months for 5 years, anoscopy every 6-12 months x 3 years, CT chest/abdomen/pelvis annually for 3 years -note PET/CT not in NCCN If persistent disease > re-evaluate in 4 weeks, continue at 3 month intervals -per ACT II, disease may continue to regress even at 26 weeks -if mass persistent then, biopsy If progressive disease (biopsy proven) > restage > APR if local, chemo+/- RT if metastatic -salvage APR: 5-year DFS 40-50%, OS 50-60% If local recurrence: APR salvage (w colostomy); LC 50% If groin recurrence: groin dissection