GNM Flashcards

1
Q

order of things to prove

A

1) d owes duty of care
2) d breaches duty
3) risk of death
4) breach causes death
5) d is grossly negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

waker

A

two criminals still owe duty of care to eachother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

blyth

A

DOC = not doing something a reasonable person would do or vise versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

adomako

A

defines GNM as a “gross derelection of care”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

nettleship v weston

A

inexperience doesnt change SOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

bolam

A

proffesionalism raised SOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mullins v richards

A

age lowers standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

miller v jackson

A

size of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

paris

A

seriousness of potential harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

latimer v AEC

A

practicabilities of precausions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

watt v HCC

A

benefit of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

misra

A

reasonable person would foresee a risk of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

lewin

A

example of a SRP not foreseeing risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

pagett

A

but for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

smith

A

operative and substantial test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

adomako test

A

D’s conduct is so bad, as to amount to a crime