governance approaches

Question 1

assumptions

Answer 1

1. integration processes evolve unevenly in different policy fields
2. integration processes are intergovernmental and supranational
3. integration processes are driven by public and private actors from various levels

Question 2

key concepts

Answer 2

1. multilevel governance
2. coordination dilemma
3. types od coordination
4. eu governance modes

Question 3

multi level

Answer 3

efective governance involves many different levels. Fragmented (type 1) national govs and fluid( type 2) the EU.

Question 4

multilevel Gov type 1

Answer 4

1. general purpose jurisdiction based on a community
2. jurisdictions don’t intersect at any level
   3, there is a limited number of jurisdictions and they are organised in a limited number of levels
3. there’s a lastig system wide architecture

Question 5

multilevel gov type 2

Answer 5

1. more task specific jurisdiction
2. jurisdictions are intersecting at all levels
3. unlimited number of jurisdictions and there is no limit to the number of jurisdictions
4. the architecture is more ad hoc. making them fluid and thus exist in size or at all depending on the urgency or relevancy

Question 6

coordination dilemma

Answer 6

due to spillovers to different policy areas, some coordination is needed between jurisdictions. which is conceived a a second order coordination problem, because it involves coordination among institutions that coordinate human activity in order to solve a societal problem that different individual institutions have.

Question 7

eu governante modes

Answer 7

1. supranational joint décision making: co-decision
2. supranational delegation: MS permitting the eu to decide, so that they are apolitical
3. political competition: intergovernmental disagreements and competition
4. inter- and transgovernmental networks:
   cooperating agencies to regulate some policies, no hierarchy
5. intergovernmental coordinatin
6. corporatism
7. public-private partnerships

Question 8

theoretical critique

Answer 8

1. doesn’t offer analytically relevant causal explanations
2. nation states veto is underestimated in many approaches
3. tend to ignore political conflict and power imbalances