Government Intervention Flashcards
(47 cards)
Indirect taxes
- can be imposed on purchase of goods and services
- two types: specific taxes - a fixed amount charged per unit of a particular good, no matter price of a good
Ad valorem tax - charged as a proportion of a good. Causes non parallel shift in supply curve
Government taxes to deal with negative externalities
May use multiple indirect taxes on one item -> aims to internalise the externality that the good produces -> make revenue for government which can be used to offset effects of externalities
Total amount of tax paid
- amount of tax passed on to consumer depends on PED - the more inelastic, the more passed on to consumer
Advantages of taxation
- cost of negative externality internalised -> may reduce demand and level of goods production -> reducing effect
- revenue gained can be used by government to offset externalities
Disadvantages of taxation
- Difficult to put monetary value on cost of negative externality
- for inelastic demand goods, demand isn’t reduced by extra cost of tax
- increase cost of production -> reduces product’s international competitiveness
- firms may choose to relocate and sell goods abroad to avoid tax -> remove contributions o economy
- revenue received by gov’t may not be used on reducing effects of externalities
Subsidies
- govt pay subsidies with aim of encouraging production and consumption of goods and services with positive externalities. Supply curve shifts to right.
- can encourage purchase and use of goods/services which reduce negative externalities
- proportion of subsidy producers and consumers benefit from depends on elasticity of supply and demand curves
Advantages of subsidies
- benefits of goods with positive externalities is internalised
- can change preferences. Making merit good cheaper increases demand for it
- positive externalities still present
- can support domestic industry until it grows to point that it can exploit EOS and become internationally competitive
Disadvantages of subsidies
- difficult to put monetary value on benefit of positive externalities
- any subsidy has opportunity cost
- make producers inefficient and reliant on subsidies - less incentive to reduce costs or innovate
- effectiveness depends on PED
- subsidised goods and services may not be as good as those they’re aiming to replace
Maximum prices
- set to increase consumption of merit good or to make a necessity more affordable
- if set above market equilibrium, will have no impact
- if set below -> excess demand and shortage in supply -> product needs to be rationed out
- a good PES and PED will have big effect on amount of excess demand
Advantages of max prices
- can help increase fairness -> allows more people ability to purchase certain goods and services
- can prevent monopolies from exploiting consumers
Disadvantages of max prices
- since D>S, some people can’t buy product
- govt may need to introduce rationing scheme to allocate good eg ballot
- excess demand can lead to creation of black market for good
Min prices
- make sure suppliers get fair prices
- if set below market equilibrium, will have no impact
- if set above, will reduce demand and increase supply
- govt must purchase excess supply at guaranteed min price. The goods bought will be either stockpiled or destroyed.
- goods PES and PED will have big impact on amount of excess supply
- restrict monopsony power as buyer can’t keep negotiating lower prices
Advantages of min price
- producers have guaranteed min income -> encourages investment
- stockpiles can be used when supply reduced or as overseas aid
Disadvantages of min price
- consumers paying higher price than market equilibrium
- resources used to produce excess supply could be used elsewhere -> inefficient allocation of resources
- schemes may have high opportunity cost
- destroying excess goods is waste of resources
State provision
- govts use tax revenue to pay for certain goods and services so that they’re free/largely free, when consumed
- e.g. NHS, state education, waste disposal and the fire and police services
- can come directly from govt or alternatively govt can purchase good/service from private sector and provide it to public for free
Advantages of state provision
- can be used to increase consumption of merit goods, such as education and health
- can help reduce inequalities in access to services
- can redistribute income
- level of state provision is value judgement made by govt -> based on how important to society they think it is that they provide good/service
Disadvantages of state provision
- less incentive to operate efficiently (no price mechanism)
- may fail to respond to consumer -> lacks motive of profit to determine whats supplied
- large opportunity costs
- can recue individuals’ self reliance
Health care being state provided
- govt funds NHS so society benefits from positive externalities of health care
- drawbacks include: NHS is free at point of delivery -> excess demand and long waiting lists
- hospitals and clinics can be wasteful of resources
- may not always respond to needs and wants of patients
- can reduce patients’ self-reliance
Privatisation
- the transfer of the ownership of a firm/industry from the public sector to private sector
- can lead to more efficient firm/industry -> will be open to free market competition
Privatisation includes:
- sale of public firms
- contracting out services - govt pays private firm to carry out work on their behalf
- competitive tendering - private firms bid/compete to gain contract to provide service for govt. Will compete on price and quality of service offered
- Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) - private firm works with govt to build something or provide service for public. An example is a PFI (Public Finance Initiative) - a private firm is contracted by govt to run a project
Advantages of privatisation
- increased competition improves efficiency and reduces x-inefficiency
- improves resource allocation - market signals
- PFIs enable building of important facilities govt couldn’t afford
- PFIs eans lower taxes in SR -> govt wont pay for new facility
- govt gains revenue from selling firms
Disadvantages of privatisation
- privatised public monopoly likely to become private monopoly -> extra measures needed
- privatised firms less focused on afety and quality
- PFI often cost more in LR than worth - adds govt debt
- PFI means higher taxes for future generations to pay for cost of govt leasing facility
Regulations
- rules enforced by authority and backed up with legislation -> legal action can be taken against those who break rules
- used to try and reduce market failure and its impacts
can help in: - reducing use of demerit goods and services. Reducing power of monopolies. Providing some protection for consumers and producers from problems arising from asymmetric info
Limitations of regulations
- difficult for govt to determine what is correct
- need for regulation in some areas to be worldwide rather than just one country e.g. greenhouse gas emissions
- following excessive regulations expensive -> may force firms to close or move country
- monitoring can be expensive for govt and if punishment for breaking regulations isn’t harsh enough, then they may not be a deterrent and change behaviours