Gunderson et al. Flashcards

1
Q

When did Gunderson et al.’s study take place?

A

2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give the 2 aims of Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. How do different types of parental praise affect a child’s later ideas about what motivates and causes behaviour?
  2. Do parents give more person praise and less process praise to girls than boys?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give the 3 key features of the procedures of Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. Ppts and data collectors unaware of true nature of study - thought it was investigating language development
  2. Caregiver-child interactions during a ‘typical day at home’ were observed and videotaped
  3. At 7 to 8 years old, children answered questions about their ideas about what underpins intelligence and their socio-moral views on what underpins good and bad behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give the 3 key findings of Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. 24.4% of praise for boys was process praise, compared to the 10.3% of praise for girls that was process praise.
  2. Discovered a link between later signs of an incremental motivational framework and process praise
  3. No link between person praise and later signs of an entity motivational framework
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give the 2 main conclusions drawn from Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. Clear link between IMF and process praise.
  2. Boys = more process praise than girls and tended to have more of an IMF
  • Fits findings of other studies that conclude
    girls tend to attribute failure to ability more than
    boys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give 2 strengths of Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. Supports other research studies
    • Results from Dweck’s experimental studies were
      found in Gunderson’s naturalistic environment
  2. Researchers and participants didn’t know the true nature of the study.
    • Helps to avoid bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of Gunderson’s study.

A
  1. Possibly unethical
    • Should be as little deceit as possible when. A debrief may have made this more ethically acceptable
  2. May lack validity
    • Parents may change style of praise upon being
      observed regardless of whether they knew exactly
      what aspect of their behaviour was being observed
    • data may be unnatural
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define the following:

1) Person praise
2) Process praise
3) Framework
4) Incremental motivational framework
5) Entity motivational framework

A

1) Praising a ability
2) Praising a behaviour/effort
3) Ideas
4) Belief traits are malleable
5) Belief traits and abilities are fixed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly