Gynae Landmark Trials Flashcards
(50 cards)
What is the PLCO trial and aim
The effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality - the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening randomised control trial, 2011
RCT - 78,000 women
Aim: to assess effect of ovarian cancer screening on mortality
PLCO trial
PICO
The effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality - the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening randomised control trial
Population: 55-74 yr olds, nil previous lung/ovarian/CRC cancer
Intervention: Annual Ca-125 screening, abnormal >35 + TVUSS
Comparison: usual care
Outcomes: mortality from ovarian cancer
PLCO trial results
The effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality - the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening randomised control trial 2011
- No difference in ovarian cancer mortality, diagnosis or stage
- Increased harm from screening, 5% false + each –> OT –> 15% serious complication rate
- PPV of ca-125 + TVUSS only 23%, only 60% of cancer screen detected
- All cause mortality unchanged
Strengths/limitations of PLCO trial
The effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality - the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening randomised control trial 2011
Strengths
- large numbers
minimal screening outside protocol
limits
- not blinded
- no information re. which systemic therapy or surgeon both affect survival
- screening usually invasive test (TVUSS)
Summary of PLCO trial
The effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality - the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening randomised control trial 2011
screening intervention is not effective at reducing mortality from ovarian cancer in average risk women AND increases harm from intervention
What is the SPIN trial and aim
SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multi centre, RCT of LMWH and LDA for recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010
RCT - multi-country - 294 women
Aim: to assess whether aspirin + LMWH + monitoring is better than monitoring alone in those with unexplained recurrent miscarriage
SPIN
PICO
SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multi centre, RCT of LMWH and LDA for recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010
Population: at ANC <7/40 with history of 2+ consecutive pregnancy loss <24/40, no cause identified for recurrent MC
Intervention: aspirin 75 mg + LMWH 40 mg SC + monitoring
Comparison: monitoring alone
Outcome: loss of index pregnancy
SPIN trial results
SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multi centre, RCT of LMWH and LDA for recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010
- No difference in outcomes
- loss of about 20% in both groups
Strengths and limitations of SPIN trial
SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multi centre, RCT of LMWH and LDA for recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010
Strengths
- RCT
Limitations
- Design not robust enough to examine subgroups
- Small Numbers
- Looked at 2 rather than 3 consecutive miscarriages
- already 7 weeks along - further research into starting preconception
SPIN trial summary
SPIN (Scottish Pregnancy Intervention) study: a multi centre, RCT of LMWH and LDA for recurrent miscarriage. Blood 2010
LMWH + Aspirin DOES NOT reduce unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss
What is the LACE trial and aim
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free survival among women with stage I endometrial Cancer. Janda et al 2017
Multinational randomised trial - 760 women
Aim: to investigate whether TLH is equivalent to TAH in women with treatment naive endometrial Ca
LACE
PICO
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free survival among women with stage I endometrial Cancer. Janda et al 2017
Population: 760 women with stage 1 endometrioid endometrial Ca
Intervention: TLH
Comparison: TAH
Outcomes: disease-free survival assessed at 4.5 years after randomisation, secondary outcomes: recurrence of endometrial Ca and overall survival
LACE trial results
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free survival among women with stage I endometrial Cancer. Janda et al 2017
no statistically significant difference in recurrence of endometrial Ca or overall survival between TLH or TAH
LACE trial strengths and limitations
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free survival among women with stage I endometrial Cancer. Janda et al 2017
Strengths
- Randomised equivalence trial
- Nz population - generalisable
- Surgeons were accredited to perform in the study
Limitations
- Not blinded
- Randomisation was performed prior to the patient being scheduled for surgery
- Funding constraints - 2 phase design first focusing on QoL
- Inconsistency of pelvic and aortic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
LACE trial Summary
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free survival among women with stage I endometrial Cancer. Janda et al 2017
Women with early stage endometrial Ca - TLH is appropriate approach for treatment of stage 1 endometrial Ca
What is ALIFE trial and aim
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
RCT 364 women
Aim: does aspirin + heparin vs. aspirin alone improve live births rates vs. placebo
ALIFE trial
PICO
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
Population: 18-42y, 2 or more unexplained MC <20/40 attempting conception or <6/40
Intervention/comparison
- 80 mg aspirin to 36/40 + LMWH from 6/40 till labour
- 80 mg aspirin alone
- Placebo
Outcomes: rate of live birth
ALIFE trial results
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
no difference in live birth rates between groups ~ 55%
Those receiving combo therapy delivered 1 weeks earlier than placebo
No difference in the subgroup analysis of women with thrombophilia
ALIFE trial strengths/limitations
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
Strengths
- RCT
Limitations
- 2 or more MC rather than 3
- only 85% adherence to treatment
- Use of LMWH not blinded
- Not powered to assess effect of treatment on thrombophilia (prevalence was 16%)
ALIFE trial summary
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
LDA +/- heparin does not improve life birth rate for unexplained recurrent MC
Million women study and aim
Breast Cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million women study, Million woman study group, Lancet 2003
Aim: Effects of HRT on breast cancer incidence and mortality
Million women study
PICO
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
Population: cohort study on million UK women 50-65 y gave info on HRT use and personal details, FU for cancer incidence and death
- 9364 Br Ca, 637 deaths
Inclusion: women recruited at time of triennial breast screening
Intervention: split according to use and type of HRT, menopausal status and baseline factors
Million women study results
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
HRT - half had used at some time
Breast Ca
- current users at recruitment more likely to develop than never uses RR 1.66 (ss)
– E only RR 1.3 (ss)
– E+P RR 2 (ss)
also more likely to die from Br Ca RR 1.22
- Past users of HRT were not at increased risk of Br Ca/death RR 1.01 and 1.05
- Tibolone increased risk of Br Ca incidence 1.45 (ss) - less effect than E/P
- In current users, Br Ca increased with total duration of use
- Little variation in the RR between specific Es and Ps and their doses or between continuous or sequential regimens
- After 10 years of HRT = 5 additional breast Ca per 1000 users E only and 19 for E+P
- Effect of HRT or tibolone for increased Br Ca risk wears off by about 5 years
Million Women Study strengths and limitations
Aspirin + Heparin or Aspirin alone in women with recurrent miscarriage. Kaandorp (NEJM2010)
Strengths
- Large numbers and long f/up
Limits
- Poor design
- Previous estradiol use - used then stopped had been included in never used group
- Endometrial Ca risk persists after stopping HRT
- Average age women 55.9 so higher risk group that women taking HRT in 40s and early 50s
- Only assessed the 75% of women who show up for screening