Head 23: 3 Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

In what ways is land supported?

A

Subjacently (from beneath)

Adjacently (from the side)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

It is a delict to…

A

Use your land in such a way as to cause withdrawal of your neighbour’s support.
⁃ In practice important mainly (in relation to subjacent support) where surface belongs to A and minerals to B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is there a positive duty to support?

A

There is no positive duty to support. Obligation is merely not to withdraw existing support. Liability is strict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can title deeds vary the rules on support?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who is liable for damage caused by coal mining.

A

Under the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991 for damage caused by coal-mining (evening if the mining took place prior to nationalisation of the coal industry - it doesn’t matter when the mine was actually active.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is aemulatio vicini?

A

This is Latin for ‘abuse of rights’ - in other words, where one landowner carries out a spiteful act in relation to your neighbour. It may be that this act is not a delict but nonetheless there may be a remedy under the doctrine of aemulatio vicini.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Dunlop v Robertson 1803

A

The defender was a solicitor who didn’t get on with his neighbour. He increased the height of his wall from 8ft to 16ft and this blocked out the height reaching 2 of the 3 stories of his neighbours house. He argued that this was done for reasons of privacy and this defence succeeded.
⁃ [There are a number of other cases about fences and hedges etc where the same defence has succeeded. Thus it is pretty hard to succeed in a case of aemulatio vicini because if the defender can point to a reason for their actions that is legitimate then they are entitled to do it.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

More v Boyle 1967

A

Man closed off a water pipe which ran through his garden which was supplying his neighbour’s house. It was argued he was doing it to be spiteful. This was held to be a relevant case of aemulatio vicini since he was doing it for reasons of spite - so the purser succeeded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

High Hedges (S) Act 2013

A

Allows you to apply to your local authority if you don’t like the fact there is a high hedge affecting your property. The hedge must be at least 2 meters in height and must be a barrier to light. This legislation comes into force on 1 April 2014.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly