Heart Failure Trials Flashcards
(38 cards)
SOLVD
Enalapril vs placebo 2569 patients, NYHA II-III, EF <35% 16% reduction in mortality 26% reduction in mortality/hosp NEJM 1991
CONSENSUS I
Enalapril vs Placebo
253 patients, NYHA IV
40% reduction in crude mortality
NEJM 1987
MERIT-HF
Metoprolol XL vs placebo
3991 patients, NYHA II (25mg daily) or III-IV (12.5mg daily), EF <40%
44% reduction in deaths from sudden death and worsening heart failure
Lancet 1999
COPERNICUS
Carvedilol vs placebo
2289 patients, NYHA III-IV, EF <25%
80% reduction in all cause mortality in high risk patients
NEJM 1996
SAVE
Captopril vs placebo
2231 patients 3-16 days after ACS, EF<40%
19% reduction in mortality, also reduced CV events, CV mortality, new severe HF, CHF hosp, recurrent MI
NEJM 1992
VALIANT
Valsartan vs Captopril vs both
14,703 patients post-MI with HF
No difference in benefit, increased risk of AE in combination group
Euro J HF, 2003
RALES
Spironolactone vs placebo 1663 patients, NYHA III-IV, EF<35% 25-50mg daily as tolerated (hyperK) 30% reduction of mortality NEJM 1999
PARADIGM-HF
Valsartan/neprilysin vs Enalapril 8399 patients, NYHA II-IV, EF <40% 20% reduction in CV death/hosp 20% reduction in CV mortality 16% reduction in all-cause mortality (Serious angioedema when tried in combination with enalapril) NEJM 2014
EPHESUS
Eplerenone vs placebo 6632 patients 3-14d post-MI, EF<40% 15% reduction in total mortality 13% reduction in CV mortality/hosp, 21% reduction in SCD No hyperkalemia deaths NEJM 2003
Val-HeFT
Valsartan vs placebo (on top of standard therapy including ACEi) 5010 patients NYHA II-IV, EF <40% No difference in mortality 13% reduction in hospitalization Adverse effect in ACE+ARB+BB NEJM 2001
CIBIS-II
Bisoprolol vs placebo Beta-1 selective 2647 patients, NYHA III-IV, EF<35% 34% reduction of all-cause mortality NEJM 1999
COMET
Carvedilol 25 vs metoprolol tartrate 50
1511 patients, NYHA II-IV, EF<35%
17% reduction in all-cause mortality in Carvedilol group
Lancet 2003
HEAAL
High vs Low-Dose Losartan 3846 patients, NYHA II-IV, EF<40% 150mg vs 50mg 10% reduction in mortality/HF hosp More renal imp, hypotension, hyperK Lancet 2009
CAPRICORN
Carvedilol vs placebo 1959 patients, post-MI, EF<40% 6.25mg titrate to 25mg BID 23% reduction in all-cause mortality Reduced CV mortality, recurrent MI Lancet 2001
CHARM-Added
Candesartan vs placebo on ACEi tx
2548 patients, NYHA II-IV, EF<40%
15% reduction in CV death/hosp +/- non-fatal MI, CVA
Reduced CV mortality, but not a planned endpoint
Lancet 2003
CHARM-Alternative
Candesartan vs placebo Patients who can't tolerate ACEi 2028 patients, NYHA II-IV, EF<40% 23% reduction in CV death/hosp Lancet 2003
BLOCK HF
BiV pacing vs RV alone pacing
691 patients requiring pacemaker, NYHA I-III, LVEF
CARRESS-HF
Ultrafiltration (200cc/hr) vs medical therapy (Lasix gtt, metolazone, inotropes or vasodilators prn)
188 patients, hospitalized for ADHF, worsening renal function (inc Cr >0.3), volume overload, SBP>90
Change in Cr (significantly worse in UF) and change in weight (no difference) at 96 hours
No other differences
NEJM 2012
A-HeFT
ISDN/hydralazine vs placebo
1050 AA patients, NYHA III-IV, LVEF 6.5cm
Reduced all-cause mortality/hosp/QOL score
Reduced all-cause mortality (6.2% vs 10.2%)
NEJM 2004
EMPHASIS-HF
Eplerenone vs placebo in NYHA II
2737 patients, NYHA II, LVEF<2.0 in women
34% reduction in CV death/hosp (18.3% vs 25.9%)
23% reduction in CV mortality (10.8% vs 13.5%)
NEJM 2010
TOPCAT
Spironolactone vs placebo in HFpEF
3445 patients, LVEF>45%
No difference in composite CV death/cardiac arrest/hospitalization
Did reduce HF hospitalization by 17%
More hyperK, but no diff in serious adverse events, Cr>3, or dialysis
USA vs Russia/Georgia, diff results
PARTNER 2
TAVR vs SAVR
699 high-risk patients with severe AS
No diff in all-cause mortality or 2-year stroke rate, higher 30-day stroke rate.
Higher paravalvular regurgitation leading to increased late mortality.
NEJM 2012
PARTNER 1
TAVR vs standard therapy
358 patients who could not undergo surgery
Reduced mortality at 1 year
Reduced all-cause mortality at 2 years (43.3% vs 68%) CV death (31% vs 62%), hospitalization, and improved functional status.
Increased major strokes (5.0% vs 1.1%) and major vascular complications (16.2% vs 1.1%)
NEJM 2010
AFFIRM
Rate vs rhythm control in AFib
4060 patients with atrial fibrillation
Borderline increased mortality in rhythm-control (23.8% vs 21.3%, p=0.08)
Increased hospitalizations and adverse drug effects in rhythm-control
NEJM 2002